Posted on 07/17/2021 7:15:25 PM PDT by ml/nj
This is an abbreviated version of the excellent Epix Documentary. The linked page has links to Part 1 and Part 2 of this program.
Highly recommended as an introduction or a refresher to the TWA 800 disaster. (Spoiler alert: It was a Navy missile.)
ML/NJ
“ So you buy the CIA/FBI center fuel tank explanation?”
I believe the published NTSB report.
I base that on a military career that includes participating in surface to air missile launch exercises from a navy ship. 16 years flying fighter aircraft including multiple combat tours. Formal training in aircraft accident investigation. And 18 years flying a variety of large commercial aircraft including 4 different Boeing aircraft.
Really?
Could you point to any place in the video where someone says anything was fired from land.
ML/NJ
The video says only one supposed missile came from the ocean. But let’s stick to basics. Are you now changing your theory to there being three missiles instead of one?
You're the one talking about three missiles. I don't recall anything about three missiles. I wasn't there. Some witnesses say two. Some only describe one. Recalling something unexpected that occurred at mach one might create confusion, no? But most all saw at least one missile.
Do you believe the plane zoomed upward like the CIA?
ML/NJ
I didn’t post a silly website describing TWA800 getting hit with three missiles. You did.
I didn’t reference a silly Australian news piece describing three missiles hitting TWA800. You did.
I also didn’t provide an inaccurate “spoiler alert” for both saying “it was a Navy missile”. You did.
I do understand why you are trying to run away from all of that. But as I’ve said, the best way to expose a tin hat conspiracy theory is to allow the people who promote it to keep talking. You’re doing a bang up job of that.
And I mentioned in a previous post. I believe the NTSB report on TWA800.
Fair enough. But I wouldn’t believe the CIA/FBI if they told me the sky was blue. I base that on 55 years of being lied to.
McGonigal (An FBI agent who at one point was compromised by bribes from Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska) joined the FBI in 1996 and started his career working on the investigation into the TWA flight 800...
which freeper of long ago espoused that theory?....I'm thinking Micheal Rivero ???
Rush supported Jim Kallstrom IIRC...
no...Toon....it happened very close to the Atlanta Olympics as well...
I remember the day after the crash the New York Post had a photo of somebody’s patio BBQ with one person in it and the obvious trail of a missile heading into the sky behind it.
It has been completely scrubbed from the Interwebs.
There were tons of witnesses who claimed “missile”.
No aircraft were later grounded in response to the risk of center fuel tank explosions.
The official explanation makes no sense.
The fact that the CIA got dragged into what should have been a standard NTSB investigation is another clue.
The fact that the Clinton administration was pathological liars is another clue.
Navy surface ship or terrorist missile—I do not know.
If I had to place bets on one or the other I would go with Navy accidental missile fire.
Accidents happen.
Honest people admit them.
Clintons do not.
What does the dogs didn’t bark mean?
it is used to indicate the watchers not saying anything because they know the perps.
The adventure of Silver Blaze.
Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.