Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Infrastructure Will Not Come Good, Fast, And Cheap
Advancing Time ^ | 03/28/2021 | Bruce Wilds

Posted on 03/28/2021 11:30:38 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Anyone naive enough to think America is about to receive a big gift of newfangled "fixed installations" needed in order to function should look long and hard at what is really being proposed. The "underlying structure" a country and the economy rely upon includes things such as roads, bridges, dams, water and sewer systems, railways and subways, airports, and harbors. None of these things are cheap to construct and when it comes to infrastructure the words, good, fast, and cheap should never be clustered together. While many people see government spending on infrastructure as a job creator and a silver bullet for our ailing economy I would like to raise a word of caution, things are not that simple. The cynical part of me thinks the American people should get ready to get bent over and taken advantage of.

Spending Trillions Likely To Result In An Epic Fail
Now that Biden's massive Covid-19 relief package has been signed into law, talk is moving towards what is next on the agenda, That's where, most likely, his infrastructure plan resides, and this is a plan set to explode the budget. If you think that $1.9 trillion is a lot of money, it pales next to what the Democrats are going to propose as they continue on their spending spree. It appears that Biden wants $3 trillion or more which should scare away moderates such as West Virginia's Joe Manchin but it has not. Not only has Manchin not blinked at $3 trillion in new spending instead, he recently stated Congress should do “everything we possibly can” to pay for it. He said there should be “tax adjustments” to former President Donald Trump’s 2017 tax law to boost revenues, his endorsement of raising the corporate rate from the current 21 percent to at least 25 percent, however, would do little.

The debate over how much we need to spend and on what, could go on for ever but this is not the answer. Please note, this is not "free money" but that message is likely to be ignored in the same way a great deal of the population fails to appreciate that most of the $1.9 trillion has yet to be spent. An example is how screwed up this flow of money can be is apparent in Fort Wayne, Ind. the city announced only days ago it had  hired Homebase, a nationally recognized consulting firm to evaluate “the state of homelessness” in the city and layout a plan to address it. The project should take nine months, the city said. (Funding came through the CARES Act passed in late March of 2020.)

Many people seem to see money flowing from Washington, such as this infrastructure bill, as not costing us anything because the bill is shrouded with the message the project will more than pay for itself over time by creating greater growth. The problem is that when it comes to such spending, politicians often prefer to use such funds on what they view as legacy projects that will shape the future of their area or shiny pet projects that will enrich their cronies. Many of these tend to be rather wasteful and controversial and it is not uncommon to see them plagued by cost overruns.

In truth, when it comes to infrastructure, the Democrats and Republicans are not on the same page. While Republicans may be willing to spend federal money on things like highways, bridges, and airports, many Democrats are interested in using much of this money to build what they call "green infrastructure " and promoting clean energy or things such as electric vehicles. In short, Democrats wish to use this money in a giant experiment to create what they hope will be a more sustainable world. Instead, we should prepare to see more "bridges to nowhere" and wasted spending exists than most taxpayers can imagine.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Society
KEYWORDS: infrastructure; spending
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 03/28/2021 11:30:38 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Shovel

Ready


2 posted on 03/28/2021 11:31:45 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

You can have 2 out of 3 of Good, Fast or Cheap, but not all three.


3 posted on 03/28/2021 11:31:51 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The latest Infrastructure Hustle, along with green jobs for all, free healthcare, and permanent government paychecks.


4 posted on 03/28/2021 11:34:08 AM PDT by Huskrrrr (Pronouns? I need no stinkin pronouns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When contracting, the rule of two out of three always applies...

You can get something fast...
You can get something good and high quality...
You can get something cheap...

Pick two out of three...

EXCEPT when government is involved, when you are likely to get ZERO out of the three.


5 posted on 03/28/2021 11:37:10 AM PDT by rottndog (Fact: There are more airplanes in the ocean than Submarines in the sky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I find it interesting that the Democrats always raise taxes to pay for “renewing infrastructure” that never seems to get “renewed.”


6 posted on 03/28/2021 11:37:43 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Lining the pockets of friends and relatives of the politicians. Kickbacks included.


7 posted on 03/28/2021 11:39:44 AM PDT by Old Yeller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr

Fine when the Gopers are back in power pass a law requiring the Democrats pay back every penny. Call Our Children’s Future Act.


8 posted on 03/28/2021 11:40:02 AM PDT by joegoeny ("Nuts!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Barry the Muslim did this and within 24 hours every City, County and State project had those Stupid signs put up on EXISTING JOB SITES. One Giant FRAUD just like Joe and his Ho.


9 posted on 03/28/2021 11:41:40 AM PDT by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

You can either (A) build things or (B) line Democrat and union pockets. Hmmm, let’s see. A or B? A or B? That’s a hard one.


10 posted on 03/28/2021 11:43:46 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (The Weak Never Started, The Cowards fail along the way, Only the Strong Survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This infrastructure spending is a complete rip-off. We are on the cusp of incredible technological breakthroughs, with self-driving cars that communicate with each other and even personal flying drones. All of these technologies are going to change the way we live, and improve efficiencies, reduce traffic, and make the highways and byways last longer due to reduced wear and tear.

These politicians and bureaucrats should be liberating the market and not wasting hard earned tax dollars on outdated concepts. Sure, fix the roads when they need to be fixed. That’s what we pay taxes for. But spending nearly a years’ worth of tax revenue for something that will be roughly half obsolete in a decade is a farce.


11 posted on 03/28/2021 11:45:05 AM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Oh and by the way, they cannot even figure out how to dislodge a wayward ship in the Suez Canal... but we’re supposed to consent to $3 trillion to build what exactly?


12 posted on 03/28/2021 11:46:24 AM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

What, do you think gender studies majors can build anything at all? If you bought them an erector set they’d call you a racist.


13 posted on 03/28/2021 11:48:03 AM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine

“You have to spend the $3 trillion to see what we are building for you.”


14 posted on 03/28/2021 11:49:02 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (The Weak Never Started, The Cowards fail along the way, Only the Strong Survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
You can have 2 out of 3 of Good, Fast or Cheap, but not all three.

Sorry, you can have only ONE out of three on a worthwhile project, and NONE out of three on a Pork Project.

15 posted on 03/28/2021 11:49:17 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (Celebrate Decivilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Where did all the billions Obama spent on 'shovel ready' projects? The money's gone, the projects never happened. Who got rich on sweetheart deals and graft?

One thing for sure, Biden is a crook and he wants in on as much of that action as he can get in his turn at the trough.

16 posted on 03/28/2021 11:53:09 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All
The only constitutionally express power that the states have given the feds to deal with infrastructure is on property that the feds have bought from the states and private citizens in full compliance with the Constitution imo, correction welcome.

In other words, if the very corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification feds weren’t continually stealing state revenues by means of unconstitutional federal taxes, taxes that Congress cannot reasonably justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers, then the states would find the revenues that they need to maintain their respective infrastructures without continually begging the feds to give their stolen revenues back to them.

"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

17 posted on 03/28/2021 12:25:26 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

>>You can have 2 out of 3 of Good, Fast or Cheap, but not all three.

In the private sector, sure. But this is unionized goverment spending; it will be neither good, nor fast, nor cheap.


18 posted on 03/28/2021 12:27:08 PM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ~you/base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My mother was very Liberal. She thought government solutions were usually the best idea in all situations.

But I remember many years ago, we drove past a small bridge that was being fixed. It was small enough that I could literally have thrown a rock from one end to the other (I was probably 12). They had been working on fixing that bridge for something like 7 years.

My mother was driving past it and yelled out, “We won WWII in less time than it’s taking them to fix that little bridge!!”

She never did seem to catch on to the really big picture. But she understood the infrastructure side of things.


19 posted on 03/28/2021 12:41:13 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("I see you did something -- why you so racist?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cranked

Shovel Cash To Union Bosses

AlReady


20 posted on 03/28/2021 1:01:24 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson