Posted on 03/24/2021 10:34:34 AM PDT by ransomnote
This post is organized to present 4 points to consider, and then a few key questions regarding these considerations, and finally overall observations that together, I believe, demonstrate that the vaccines, and their ‘rushed’ trials are mixtures of fabrications.
Referencing his 30+ years of experience working in the vaccine industry, Dr. Yeadon makes the case that the PRC test renders false positive test results for approximately 90% of tests administered, and that false negatives are also reported. The publication date is 9/20/2020 at which time Dr. Yeadon states that he believes the vaccines will be pulled from the marked within 6 months following introduction.
From the article:
“Because of the high false positive rate and the low prevalence, almost every positive test, a so-called case, identified by Pillar 2 since May of this year has been a FALSE POSITIVE. Not just a few percent. Not a quarter or even a half of the positives are FALSE, but around 90% of them. Put simply, the number of people Mr Hancock sombrely tells us about is an overestimate by a factor of about ten-fold. Earlier in the summer, it was an overestimate by about 20-fold.”
Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives
3/22/2021, 10:13:02 AM · by ransomnote · 15 replies
lockdownsceptics.org ^ | September 20, 2020 | Dr Michael Yeadon
In the following article, the author makes the case that the PCR is invalid because it doesn’t identify the Covid-19 virus.
The PCR test identifies manufacturers’ specified strings of molecules (i.e., ‘primer sequenes’) said to be present in the Covid-19 virus.
From the article, “The CDC is using 12 different computer data base "primer" sequences, varying from 17 to 21 nucleotide sequences in a row to look for Covaids, the same sequence found in goats, papayas, river water, motor oil, etc.”
The same small sequence found in goats, papayas, your pyjamas”
“The WHO was using human Chromosome 8 as their test database “primer” sequence to detect Covaids, which was looking for the 18 in a row nucleotide sequence ctccctttgt tgtgttgt, which is found on the 8th out of the 23 pairs of chromosomal trees on all humans.“
https://images.hive.blog/DQmUtVYWuvrdvqvqqe9xwqQtu8QBPbKwJPDhPRTgtNqnXEy/image.png
From the article:
“A so called PCR "test" is NOT a test.
It's Nobel Prize winning inventor, Kary Mullis, himself was furious that it was being used for any such nonsense as it can neither “test” for anything nor prove how much of any detected genetic material is inside anybody, let alone tell anyone if whatever it does detect is the cause of any illness or disease or not.”
PLAGUE OF FEAR 2020 - Part 7 - THE NAIL IN COVID'S COFFIN
3/18/2021, 5:53:41 PM · by ransomnote · 11 replies
hive.blog ^ | Jan 31, 2020 | Steve Falconer, francesleader
https://images.hive.blog/DQmdj7E5B62nrFFJ8JHuDbcTuxEXSx2pEWtXx5eZGG6pKvJ/image.png
For example, the following is excerpted from Moderna’s Phase 3 trial report.
The primary efficacy analysis population (referred to as the Per-Protocol Set), included 28,207 participants who received two doses (at 0 and 1 month) of either Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine (n=14,134) or placebo (n=14,073), and had a negative baseline SARS‑CoV‑2 status.
The median length of follow up for efficacy for participants in the study was 9 weeks post Dose There were 11 COVID‑19 cases in the Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine group and 185 cases in the placebo group, with a vaccine efficacy of 94.1% (95% confidence interval of 89.3% to 96.8%).
Cases of COVID‑19, starting 14 days after Dose 2, were defined as symptomatic COVID‑19 requiring positive RT-PCR result and at least two systemic symptoms or one respiratory symptom.
Among all participants in the Per-Protocol Set analysis, which included COVID‑19 cases confirmed by an adjudication committee, no cases of severe COVID‑19 were reported in the Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine group compared with 30 cases reported in the placebo group (incidence rate 9.138 per 1,000 person-years). One PCR-positive case of severe COVID‑19 in a vaccine recipient was awaiting adjudication at the time of the analysis.”
The following are just a few of the problems with using an invalid test to validate Covid-19 vaccine trials.
“In another promising medical development, the biotechnology company Moderna has announced its COVID-19 vaccine could be up to 94.5% effective.
The news comes a week after Pfizer announced its vaccine could be up to 90% effective based on a similar, early analysis from its Phase 3 trial.”
I think it’s reasonable to assume that vaccine trial participants were give the PCR ‘test’ repeatedly: at the start of the trial, after Dose 1, after Dose 2, and then routinely through the 4 or so weeks of monitoring following to see at what point they might supposedly contract (e.g., subject’s PCR ‘test’ positive 10 days after vaccine administration – too soon for vaccine to protect participant).
I think you can see where I’m going here. For the vaccine trials to be valid, the PCR test had to be valid. However the PCR test is not valid for this use, yet the many PCR ‘supposedly’ administered to 28,207 always tracked reliably to portray consistent, reliable, positive vaccine trial results
College students used to have two specific terms for false experimental data.
“Fudging the data”: After the experiment or study failed to return expected outcomes, the data was ‘modified’ to support the experimental hypothesis.
“Dry lab-ing”: While the experimental design specified in detail exacting laboratory and instrumentation critera, phases, tests etc., no actual lab work occurred (no need to wash out beakers, etc. as no real lab work took place).
I have to wonder just HOW the vaccine companies all came up with their data under the circumstances.
I’ll add one more problem with the scenario involving the development of the Covid mRNA vaccines that has me wondering. I haven’t given it a lot of thought but I believe there is something to it.
Initially I was posting that the mRNA technology upon which the mRNA vaccines were based was discovered in 2005; obtained Emergency Use Authorization and in 15 years since has failed to obtain FDA approval; conducted animal trials in 2005 and 2012 in which all animals (cats) developed anti-bodies and then when exposed to the virus being tested at the time (HIV, Hep C, other Coronaviruses), all animals died (their immune systems over-reacted).
Recently a FReeper has been reporting that there was in fact a successful trials which included "mice, ferrets, monkeys and interim report on human trials 2017" using the same nano mRNA technology underpining the Covid vaccines.
Suppressed Information About the Covid-19 Vaccine' | Vol 01 Date: 03/20/2021 (freerepublic.com)
The sources I had consulted made no mention of trials involving mice that survived. I was going to hunt for that data to see if it was correct, but now that I know the trials are worthless, I won’t bother.
Here’s the problem. The mRNA technology was considered an exciting find in 2005 because it could open the door to T-cell immunity which was otherwise little understood but believed to hold tremendous promise for human health.
The first animal trials took place in 2005 and failed. More work was done and the second round of animal trials was performed in 2012 and again met with failure. The mRNA technology under development for the past 15 years never reached human trials or obtained FDA approval.
If the FReeper is correct that trials involving mice which survived took place in 2017, why didn't the researchers move to begin full-scale trials with that technology? 3 years later that technology was modified for use in Covid-19 vaccines, but it seems like nothing happened with the platform technology until it was selected to for modification serve as the basis for the Covid-19 vaccines.
I wonder if I dig up information on this, might I find that Hillary Clinton was expected to win the 2016 election after which time her administration would have required mandatory vaccinations.
Our enemies want to reduce our population to a tame, manageable size. Just wondering. If you’ve seen the ‘Lock Down” scenarios, it does seem that the New World Order types have been planning their worldwide coup for some time, and one of the analyzed scnearios was a pandemic. And then we had Bill Gate’s symposium in 2019 walking through pandemic scenarios. Fauci funded Wuhan long before Wuhan’s ‘accidental’ release of a virus comprised of human/bat/HIV RNA material.
~~~~~~~~~~~
We’ve been betrayed in all aspects of the Planned-Demic since the engineered China virus was first deployed in Yuhan.
The sick were denied all treatment and told to go home until they needed hospitalization. How many illnesses could be spun into a fake Planned-Demic if the public were denied treatment? How can they claim to have a compassionate dedication to protecting us if they refuse us the right to try FDA approved medications when we’re dying?
HCQ and Ivermectin were FDA approved and in use with good track records for decades. The CDC not only banned the off-label use of these drugs during a time they declared an unprecedented medical emergency, they wouldn’t even award these drugs “Emergency Use Authorization” they would later grant their fake vaccines. They denied dying people the right to assume any risks in a final attempt to survive the illness.
They’ve lied to the public and told us the Covid-19 vaccines are FDA approved. Fauci himself said they were when asked on video. He then went on to craftily equate FDA approval with FDA authorization when he knows the difference.
Fauci is on video stating that asymptomatic spread does not drive epidemics; he’ll say whatever needs to be said to advance the narrative, and if it’s that asymptomic spread is devastating and we all have to shut down the economy, schools, and life stay home, he’s your guy.
45 Second Twitter Video Clip of Dr. Fauci Saying. ".... asympomatic spread is rare and historically not a driver of outbreaks. Symptomatic people drive outbreaks."
(sidenote: Fauci's NIH division collaborated with Pfizer to produce their Covid-19 vaccine and in particular, on those mouse trials.)
In the following video interview excerpt on Twitter, the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, says Dr. Fauci is a liar and not qualified for the position he holds:
Text of Mullis’ comments:
“Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, you know, he doesn’t know anything really about anything and I’d say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there you’ll know it. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine and he should not be in a position like he’s in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don’t know anything about what’s going on in the body. You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda. They make up their own rules as they go. They change them when they want to. And they smugly, like Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera,”~ Kary Mullis
Where the Covid-19 vaccines are concerned, we’ve been denied informed consent which is required for us to balance the risks versus the benefits of having the vaccine.
All benefits of the vaccine are exaggerated because the spike protein is not specific to Covid-19; we’ve probably already encountered pathogens that caused our bodies to produce the spike proteins triggered by the vaccine. The benefits of the vaccine are non existant because the vaccine is predicated on fake vaccine trials and false positives etc.
The risks of having the vaccine are deleted, purged, and ridiculed as disinformation. Even as the CDC’s VAERS database shows the Covid vaccines are notably at the top of some key observed ‘event categories’ (ER visits, life threatening reactions, Deaths) out of 93 vaccines in just 2 months into their administration.
Silencing the discussion of risk, and therefore denying us informed consent violates the primary tennent of the Nuremberg Code of 1947.
They’ve lied to lock us down and force us to wear useless masks.
Is anyone still hoping that the tightening noose and assault on our rights and our bodies is suddenly going to stop, or better yet, improve? Is it logical to hope that, after telling us to expect that our lives will never be the same and we must henceforth live from vaccination, to vaccination, a life of masked social distancing, the vaccines will actually be a product of their (non existent) integrity and good will or that the vaccines will be worse than all measures leading up to it?
They want to hurt us, to kill us. They still won't allow us to use safe, FDA approved treatments for Covid, insisting we die without it instead in order to drive us to the vaccines. Is that not the obvious conclusion of the unending series of lies driving us like livestock through a maze of narrowing chutes toward enslavement and mandatory vaccinations?
Amazing that you can post something so obviously wrong and easily refuted and still soldier on as if you have any credibility.
The current PCR test positivity rate, actual and false, is 4.4%. The highest it ever was is 21%.
I'd rather have people read your sneering posts implying I'm incapable of responding to you, than actually spend my time refuting your obvious distortions.
I bet.
You seem to be getting a little agitated and we're about the last ones on this thread so I'll see you around.
1. The virus causing the DISEASE COVID-19 has been identified and isolated. The name scientists gave given that isolated virus is SARS-CoV-2.
2. Each individual SARS-CoV-2 virus is covered with many identical copies of the virus’ spike protein. It’s that unique spike protein that the mRNA vaccines cause the immune system to produce antibodies for.
3. So, no, the vaccine makers didn’t “chose a spike protein for another type of corona virus”.
Got more smoke to blow?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bagster, how did you get House Atreides stuck to your shoe?
According to Moderna, "Recognizing the broad potential of mRNA science, we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer. It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the "program” or “app” is our mRNA drug - the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.
Note that 'selection of the spike protein' occurs through the manufacturer's selection of the mRNA sequence for their 'vaccine', which for Moderna occurred on the timeline below on January 13, 2020 and was done with the help of Anthony Fauci's division at NIH.
"Most of the vaccines under development for COVID-19 only show the immune system part of the virus, a protein chosen to prime a strong immune response. (This includes the Pfizer mRNA vaccine.) So, someone who had naturally been infected with the virus might have some additional antibody types not found in someone who had been successfully vaccinated."
Antibodies From Vaccines vs. From Natural Infection (verywellhealth.com)
According to the CDC, no isolated samples of the Covid-19 virus exist. The image below cites a July 2020 document but researchers continue to say their requests for isolated samples are denied because they are "unavailable". This limitation harms the race to develop drug treatments, leaving the field open to vaccine makers.
One problem is that the vaccine triggers the production of anti-bodies that are different from the anti-bodies caused by natural Covid-19 infection. This apparently is highy sensitive information that is being scrupulously scrubbed from the internet.
Here's an example of a doctor who died weeks after receiving the 2nd does of the vaccine. He had one type of antibody from the vaccine, and another from the natural Covid infection. I do remember reading about instances where the antibodies developed in response to natural vs vaccine spike protein in the middle of last year, but that kind of lets the cat out of the bag and history is now being rewritten.
I paid attention to him. I think that's all the little fella every really wanted.
Now I have to feed him and walk him and pick up his poo.
Grrrrrrrrrrr.
“...According to the CDC, no isolated samples of the Covid-19 virus exist....”
******************************************************
The disease named COVID-19 is caused by the virus given the name SARS-CoV-2. And the CDC has, in fact, long since ISOLATED the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the laboratory and routinely makes it readily available for research by the scientific and medical community.
Here is the timeline for those efforts:
1. On January 20, 2020, CDC received a clinical specimen collected from the first reported U.S. patient infected with SARS-CoV-2. CDC immediately placed the specimen into cell culture to grow a sufficient amount of virus for study.
2. On February 2, 2020, CDC generated enough SARS-CoV-2 grown in cell culture to distribute to medical and scientific researchers.
3. On February 4, 2020, CDC shipped SARS-CoV-2 to the BEI Resources Repository.
Here is a link with supporting information on the isolation of the virus that causes COVID-19.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/grows-virus-cell-culture.html
A man who can't spell 'too' properly has no credibility.
If I were to dissect that mish mash of illogic you just posted, I'd be here all day, so let me just leave you with this about that.
Doctors used to think that sucking the blood out of a sick person would remove the evil spirits that were making them sick.
The moral of that bit of historical trivia is to illustrate that doctors are not gods and they don't know everything just cause they went to school and were taught by other doctors that didn't know everything. Some more or less than others, more competent or less than others.
So you can kiss doctors' collective asses as much as you like, but I'll add common sense and my own personal knowledge of my own body (which I've known for man years on a close personal level) to the mix.
Guess what my common sense tells me? Don't take drugs unless you absolutely, POSTIVELEY have to. And this rona does not fall into that category, no matter how many unqualified Fauci's, stupid Biden's, or even Trumps tell me to. And certainly not a horde of wanna-be, fake doctors on FR squeaking about vitamin D day after day.
Ransomnote's 'hidden talent'?
Research. Any topic. This one happens to be the fake vaccine. The information is out there to be had. A person could earn an unofficial medical degree off the internet and save themselves tens of thousands of dollars.
They might have trouble getting the government to allow them to practice medicine, but they can have the knowledge for free, or the low, low price of a monthly internet subscription.
So that's what she can do, and better than most. At least here on FR. And she has a minor in communication.
You are not good at recognizing people's 'hidden talents', and its a thing you think you invented and have thought a lot about over your life.
You would have done well to attend the University of Life's Human Behavior and Psychology program. It would have allowed you to better recognize a person's traits.
Okay, that's what jumps out at me from reading your post. I won't go do the cut and paste quote thing. Oh, one more thing. I don't think Ransomnote cares one way or the other if you like her or not or what you have to say about what she does. Your opinion would have to be important to her for her to care. It is not.
I know this because I know her, and I feel the same way as she does.
I do wonder what your purpose is for kissing her ass on the one hand, and slamming her and what she finds important all over FR. I really don't wonder. I know. PHD, remember?
Okay, Chase. You have stolen enough of my time with your psuedo psychological wrong-headed musings.
The nerd version of 'U mad bro'. Touche.
Mojo...dude...she's kicking your ass. Maybe you better step back.
But you know doctors, so maybe you'll come back in the later rounds.
Hahahaha.
How's it feel to get beat up by a girl?
To Ransomnote:
There's no way he understand ANY of that. He'll be right back with his weak ass argument (I kinda don't, and I'm way smarter than him). I think we should just let him run around in the back yard and work it off for a while.
A normal man would say 'They have lots of evidence...'
A pretentious man would say, 'We have lots of evidence...'
Which one are you?
Wrong. If you are thinking of the three big spikes from late November to mid-January, that was the large-scale holiday foolishness. Of course the number went down after that series of travesties.
We are due for spikes again but they won’t be as high this time because vaccine. Then the warm weather will help us out again.
I do know the difference between to, and too.
Also there, their, and they’re. Your, and You’re.
In fact, when my wife and are frisky, my “Safe Word” is “Their” but she doesn’t know if I’m saying there or they’re, or their.
I was becoming preoccupied and the “To” rather than “Too” was an oversight. So their.
Funny you mentioned Bleeding as a medical treatment administered by Doctors way back when..........whenever a Doc encourages or nags me to quit smoking I often explain that many of our Founding Fathers were in the tobacco business in some way. Adams and Jefferson both lived into their 80s (and both died on the same day, July 4th) but Washington died of medical malpractice as they bled him to help his pneumonia.
I also explain that the ancient Egyptians never smoked and ya don’t see any of them walking around right now.......
The Hidden Talent thing......yes I did invent it. Something I noticed about people. It’s actually interesting because it’s amazing on how so many people are in roles, or careers where their best talent does not apply and isn’t being put to use.
Never claimed to know Ransomnote’s hidden talent, I agree though, her obvious talent is communication.
Saying that I think someone isn’t a cruel person and seems kind at heart isn’t exactly my idea of kissing ass. It’s merely describing someone’s outwardly behavior.
I have no reason for complimenting Ransomnote other than i believe it.
Often you seem to think there is always a motive behind people’s beliefs, and or comments. It seems to never occur to you that perhaps the motive is the truth, as a person may see it.
I wonder if at some point in your life you were surrounded by people the betrayed you or people that were deceptive towards you and you never recovered from that.
Just because someone doesn’t parrot you, doesn’t mean they’re secretly plotting or using “psych-ops” against you.
Getting back on track.......there are 5 or 6 Doctors here on FR. They are in different fields of medicine. As far as I know, they’re also in different parts of the country. Funny on how all agree on the vaccine issue and all have been vaccinated.
Perhaps refresh yourself with the years of school and internship a Doctor must complete. Also, a FR Doc is older and not a Millennial Doctor that was passed year after year just for sitting through the classes.
So basically you expect me and others to push Ransomnote forward past all of the years of Medical School and experience because she does great research. Ummmmmm no.
Again, I’m not bashing Ransomnote, I’m simple saying WebMD.com is no substitute for 8 years of college and internship.
I our relationship is really advancing well Mr. Bagster. This was the first reply to one of my post that did not include Troll, Derp, Fearmonger, Deepstater, or Democrat Operative.
Warms my heart.
There never is not.
Truth is not a motive. Truth is a state of being.
I wonder if at some point in your life you were surrounded by people the betrayed you or people that were deceptive towards you and you never recovered from that. Just because someone doesn’t parrot you, doesn’t mean they’re secretly plotting or using “psych-ops” against you.
A very poor Dr. Phil impression.
As far as I know, they’re also in different parts of the country. Funny on how all agree on the vaccine issue and all have been vaccinated.
And guess what. Every one of them could be wrong. At the same time. Doctor's, not gods, remember?
And doctors are not immune to indoctrination, social pressure, and psyops.
So basically you expect me and others to push Ransomnote forward past all of the years of Medical School and experience because she does great research. Ummmmmm no.
Here's what I invented, derp troll (happy?). Examine the information, not the messenger. Evaluate the messenger's possible agenda, honesty, and sources then look at the INFORMATION and use your own brain to suss it.
Reliance on the 'experts' just because they're experts, believing EVERYTHING they say categorically is a foolish way to live your life. That is the life of a sponge. Sponges have no brains. Or feet.
So, yea. Nobody's 'pushing' Ransomnote, Q, or anybody else forward over anybody else. The smart money is on evaluating information gleaned from ANYBODY and ANYWHERE.
Too many FR know-it-alls dismiss information because they don't approve of the messenger. This is one reason they hate us poor, innocent Qtards, who wouldn't hurt a fly.
Okay, enough.
I (think) our relationship is really advancing well, Mr. Bagster.
No, I won't be going to the prom with you.
#NoHomo
Whatever. Don’t get the vaccine
Its a bad look.
Happy vaxxing.
#WhatsYourMutation
Hi Eschoir
Classy Green Eyed Blonde.
Check your lore.
Eschoir is deceased.
You’re lying again.
Memes are not proof; they are what in the 1960s, the radicals called “consciousness-raising” ; akin to brand awareness for a product.
One has to get buzz around a concept onto the radar of the average person.
The left excels at it, which is why they got most of the women to hate Sarah Palin (the left defined her in the public mind), but could not with Donald Trump (he’d been a public figure for years, ‘That loudmouth real estate developer from New York who says “You’re Fired!” on TV).
This is using the left’s own tactics against them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
