Posted on 12/23/2020 11:41:07 AM PST by USA Conservative
New allegations surfaced about the presidential elections in Pennsylvania. Allegedly Pennsylvania’s own election data ported straight from the government site found 191,725 ballot records were edited or fixed AFTER election day. Many of these ballots were absentee ballots with multiple sent dates that changed month-over-month as the data was “updated.” Initially, thousands of ballots had impossible and improbable send dates, but it appears those numbers were just a drop in the bucket.
According to Here Is The Evidence:
As laid out in the Texas lawsuit, Pennsylvania’s mail-in ballot anomalies at 118,426 affected ballots. The anomalies from this December 16th data shows include:
161,774 records have alterations 128,969 were Returned Dates changes. 13,450 ballots have been deleted since Nov 3rd. 10,415 Return Date with no Mail Date 5,052 Applications Returned after Ballot Mailed 1,034 Applications Approved after Application Returned Totaling: 191,725 mail-in ballots affected by alterations, illegality, or anomalies.
In Pennsylvania’s response to the Texas lawsuit, they did not address the mail-in ballot anomalies.
On the article’s page, they have the archived datasets and Wayback Machine pages where they are still observable. The data comes straight from the Pennsylvania government’s own website, meaning it isn’t fake or altered data.
Image below:
HereIsTheEvidence released the HereIsTheEvidence Analyzer to enable anyone (including journalists) to verify/find anomalies in election data.
The HereIsTheEvidence Analyzer was applied to the December 16th dataset and this is what was found:
Images below:
Resources
Download Original Version (Pre November 21st):
WayBackMachine Cloud
Download November 23rd Version:
WayBackMachine Cloud
Download November December 16th Version:
PA.gov WayBackMachine Cloud
Expert analysis using a commonly accepted statistical test further raises serious questions as to the integrity of this election but so far every media and fact-checkers denied these allegations as false and our justice system did the same even do many Americans remain unconvinced about our election integrity!
The Democrat Party believes that vote fraud is desirable because the Democrat Party has had good success with vote fraud for many, many years.
I think this issue was addresses in one of the lawsuits and the PA SC said the SOS had the right to change ballots.
totally corrupt.
Who CARES what the Democrats question or don’t question? We don’t require their permission or approval to undo the massive vote fraud uncovered.
We are woefully short on neutral arbiters. In their absence, all the evidence in the world is irrelevant.
Time for action. Where do I get trained to use what I rid the country of these metastasizing cancers
“Yeah, sure, it was fraud, but it wasn’t ‘fraud-fraud’, so it’s OK.”
All the evidence in the world and the courts shut down
It’s obvious there was plenty of fraud in at least Philly, Detroit, and Atlanta - along with ample documentation - what’s missing is some route to get this information into government channels where it can be used to affect change - apparently 75 million Trump voters whose votes were stolen have no standing anywhere to obtain redress for their disenfranchisement.......
Just accept the loss like you always have. That’s always been the attitude. Pathetic.
PA has a data website where ALL PA DATA is available for download. Each line on the website ahs a data name, description, last updated, etc. and with a click can be downloaded.
The 2020 Primary election data was one line on the website that could be downloaded. As the data streamed in during the primary, updates to the PA online database would be updated with a ‘last updated’ time and date stamp. The updates were posted as they came in.
But a strange thing happened to the 2020 general election data.
The general election data started streaming in and the PA online data base for the website line for the 2020 general election was posted as expected as results came in, and then the data was unexpectedly locked, no access, not available, clicking on the line for that data would not do anything.
As some of us were analyzing this data as it came in, we were suddenly locked out. Other data lines were accessible, the only line that was disabled was the 2020 general election data.
Now it appears we have an answer why.
Not 'rape rape' either when it's done by a democrat... party of criminals, lowlifes, and guilty white liberal 'elites'...
bttt
Georgia, Arizona and PA.....the rightful man will be the President, again.....
how did a pub SOS in Georgia do everything in his power to allow and encourage fraud.???
I think our SOS here in Washington state perhaps must be a Sewer pick....she has been about the only state wide pub elected for a few yrs now...why her?....why no pubs as governor, SOT, AG etc....
They were, at least some of alterations, “cured”. Eighteen states are required to notify the voter over discrepancies and allow the voter to go to the election office and sign their ballot or to rectify the missing witness signature, etc. etc.That’s what one of the PA suits was about. A Federal Court Judge (Timothy Savage) in PA denied the Republican challenge.
Not to mention, way too many worthless Republican RINOs.
True, I saw the same thing happen with the Pennsylvania data. The PA government owes everyone an explanation about why the data was removed from public access.
Totally evil. Evil beyond lawful correct is my best analysis.
Thank you. Good to have confirmation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.