Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Legal Team Slams Bill Barr Comments on Voter Fraud, ‘There Hasn’t Been Any Semblance of a DOJ Investigation’
Gateway Pundit ^ | December 1, 2020 at 2:47pm | Cristina Laila

Posted on 12/01/2020 2:03:23 PM PST by kellymcneill

“With all due respect to the Attorney General, there hasn’t been any semblance of a Department of Justice investigation. We have gathered ample evidence of illegal voting in at least six states, which they have not examined. We have many witnesses swearing under oath they saw crimes being committed in connection with voter fraud. As far as we know, not a single one has been interviewed by the DOJ. The Justice Department also hasn’t audited any voting machines or used their subpoena powers to determine the truth,” Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani and Trump campaign senior legal advisor said in a statement.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: billbarr; legal; postandrun; rudygiuliani; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: malach

That must be a great job, do nothing, take a little verbal abuse, and get paid big bux with good perks. The last guy was no doubt sorry to lose it.


21 posted on 12/01/2020 2:23:27 PM PST by The Antiyuppie (When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kellymcneill

The FBI did interview one of the people who had found some evidence. Perhaps statistical. Dont remember. Person tweeted about it


22 posted on 12/01/2020 2:23:43 PM PST by RummyChick (I blame Kushner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
DF5-AAE2-F-6-C48-4-ABD-90-CD-80-C9-DC170266
He’s happy

23 posted on 12/01/2020 2:25:23 PM PST by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: kellymcneill

Well, there you go. All election fraud is ok if the DoJ decides, without investigation, that it would not have affected the election.

We live in a kleptocracy.

JoMa


25 posted on 12/01/2020 2:27:20 PM PST by joma89 (Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellymcneill

I wrote this on another thread.

““To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election,” Barr told the AP.”

Headline should be “Barr confirms fraud.”

Whether or not it effects the election outcome is irrelevant to the DoJ. It’s their job to determine if fraud occurred and this statement confirms it.

It’s not their job to determine or even look in to whether or not it would effects the outcome.

So, Barr confirmed fraud.

Any confirmed fraud is enough to compromise the results.

Election is compromised.

Must go to House contingency vote.


26 posted on 12/01/2020 2:27:23 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellymcneill

No respect -— IF he actually said he’s done an investigation on voter fraud, then he’s outed himself as purebred bought and paid for deep state.


27 posted on 12/01/2020 2:28:49 PM PST by LTC.Ret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellymcneill

William Barr’s father hired Jeffrey Epstein to teach high school boys and high school girls even though Jeffrey Epstein is not even a college graduate.


28 posted on 12/01/2020 2:29:44 PM PST by freespirit2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellymcneill
"found no evidence"


29 posted on 12/01/2020 2:32:26 PM PST by rightwingcrazy (;-,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

He did and Rudy responded


30 posted on 12/01/2020 2:33:37 PM PST by BillyCuccio (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kellymcneill

Doesn’t sound like a slam to me.....Bur whatever....


31 posted on 12/01/2020 2:34:20 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellymcneill

I think that prior service in either Bush administration should be an instant disqualifier for appointment by this or any future Republican administration.


32 posted on 12/01/2020 2:34:55 PM PST by Ikemeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ikemeister
6-C3938-B6-2721-498-A-8-FFA-B6767-C4-E95-A4
Fraud John Huber


33 posted on 12/01/2020 2:36:27 PM PST by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

The local AM stations are parroting the no proof of fraud story.
This is unbelievable. We are supposed to just go along with this fraud?


34 posted on 12/01/2020 2:40:47 PM PST by 9422WMR (Lie, cheat, steal. It’s how the democRATS operate. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kellymcneill

“Slams” is a poor word choice, but sensationalism rules these days, I suppose (and regret).


35 posted on 12/01/2020 2:43:32 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew (I'd rather have a rude President than a polite tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellymcneill

Barr’s sold Trump down the river in exchange for some sort of 30 pieces of sliver.


36 posted on 12/01/2020 2:43:38 PM PST by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca. Deport all illegals. Abolish the DEA, IRS and ATF,.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyCuccio
I see no evidence he said it.
This is a video from a few months ago on this election
In June he said, "(mail in ballots) absolutely opens the flood gates to fraud" "right now anyone could print up tens of thousands of ballots...."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FztiTg5tYZI&feature=emb_logo

In other words in June he clearly pointed out the election already had irregularities which is enough for a void election. Again we don't need "proof" as the states seem to claim.

37 posted on 12/01/2020 2:44:02 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: kellymcneill

It is not the prerogative of an AG to seek out crimes and prosecute them. We are so used to leftist AGs doing so (like they do in Communist countries), that it is disconcerting when an AG lets the law do its work from the ground up.

As the process of filtering out illegal votes goes forward, there *may* be a place for the AG to become involved in some way. A visit to the DOJ website yields ample evidence that our current AG does not shrink from prosecuting cases as law enforcement carries out its duties.


38 posted on 12/01/2020 2:44:38 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew (I'd rather have a rude President than a polite tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellymcneill

Barr has thrown in with the dark side.


39 posted on 12/01/2020 2:45:15 PM PST by Clean_Sweep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR

“no proof” is a twist in how our system works. We need to show large amounts of irregularities to void the election. Proof is for the criminal court a year from now


40 posted on 12/01/2020 2:46:28 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson