Posted on 12/01/2020 2:03:23 PM PST by kellymcneill
âWith all due respect to the Attorney General, there hasnât been any semblance of a Department of Justice investigation. We have gathered ample evidence of illegal voting in at least six states, which they have not examined. We have many witnesses swearing under oath they saw crimes being committed in connection with voter fraud. As far as we know, not a single one has been interviewed by the DOJ. The Justice Department also hasnât audited any voting machines or used their subpoena powers to determine the truth,â Trumpâs personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani and Trump campaign senior legal advisor said in a statement.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
That must be a great job, do nothing, take a little verbal abuse, and get paid big bux with good perks. The last guy was no doubt sorry to lose it.
The FBI did interview one of the people who had found some evidence. Perhaps statistical. Dont remember. Person tweeted about it
Well, there you go. All election fraud is ok if the DoJ decides, without investigation, that it would not have affected the election.
We live in a kleptocracy.
JoMa
I wrote this on another thread.
—
““To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election,” Barr told the AP.”
Headline should be “Barr confirms fraud.”
Whether or not it effects the election outcome is irrelevant to the DoJ. It’s their job to determine if fraud occurred and this statement confirms it.
It’s not their job to determine or even look in to whether or not it would effects the outcome.
—
So, Barr confirmed fraud.
Any confirmed fraud is enough to compromise the results.
Election is compromised.
Must go to House contingency vote.
No respect -— IF he actually said he’s done an investigation on voter fraud, then he’s outed himself as purebred bought and paid for deep state.
William Barr’s father hired Jeffrey Epstein to teach high school boys and high school girls even though Jeffrey Epstein is not even a college graduate.
He did and Rudy responded
Doesn’t sound like a slam to me.....Bur whatever....
I think that prior service in either Bush administration should be an instant disqualifier for appointment by this or any future Republican administration.
The local AM stations are parroting the no proof of fraud story.
This is unbelievable. We are supposed to just go along with this fraud?
“Slams” is a poor word choice, but sensationalism rules these days, I suppose (and regret).
Barr’s sold Trump down the river in exchange for some sort of 30 pieces of sliver.
In other words in June he clearly pointed out the election already had irregularities which is enough for a void election. Again we don't need "proof" as the states seem to claim.
It is not the prerogative of an AG to seek out crimes and prosecute them. We are so used to leftist AGs doing so (like they do in Communist countries), that it is disconcerting when an AG lets the law do its work from the ground up.
As the process of filtering out illegal votes goes forward, there *may* be a place for the AG to become involved in some way. A visit to the DOJ website yields ample evidence that our current AG does not shrink from prosecuting cases as law enforcement carries out its duties.
Barr has thrown in with the dark side.
“no proof” is a twist in how our system works. We need to show large amounts of irregularities to void the election. Proof is for the criminal court a year from now
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.