Tucker Carlson Lies About Sidney Powell And Dominion Hacking Proof

The Constitutional Conservatives ^ | November 28, 2020 | Daniel John Sobieski

[Hot Tabasco]

I have a sneaking suspicion that the internet is going out of its way to drive a wedge between not only Carlson but the rest of the hard hitters on FOX and the rest of the conservative base.

From what I've been witnessing here, it appears to be working......

Since when have Carlson and Hannity and the rest been such a focus of the MSM until recently?

Divide and conquer, that's what the left does best.

[sergeantdave]

“I visited the site to read the whole article but it was like the author was typing in MultiCam font. I quit trying to decipher it. Maybe it was turkey hangover.”

Give it a break, man. The cat typed it in camouflage font. If you wore your semaphore eyeglasses, it’s easily readable.

[Zhang Fei]

[This election was rigged through massive numbers of illicit ballots that were never cast by real voters.]

---

Indeed. This has to be the crux of the case.

[windsorknot]

Divide and conquer, that's what the left does best.

I never was a fan of circular firing squads.

[Zhang Fei]

[That’s still a ballot problem, not a computer or software problem.

All indications are that the Democrats have engaged in the age-old practice of “ballot stuffing.” That has nothing to do with the computer systems used to count the ballots. ]

---

My impression is that they do this mainly in black cities so that anyone who pushes back has to deal with the chimera of “black voter suppression”, in the same way that George Floyd was killed by “police brutality” rather than by his inclination to use narcotic drugs in dangerously high doses.

[Freedom56v2]

Tucker Carlsen has been a popular voice on the right for a long time. He must be destroyed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
He is doing a pretty good job of it by himself.

[poconopundit]

Thanks blackberry, I’ll check it out.

[lepton]

A week later, and still ‘new’ articles’?

[BushCountry]

THE FRAUDULENT BALLOTS ARE THE PROBLEM, NOT THE COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE.

Really? Did you know that the machines also have signature verification built-in? That they LOWER the software’s threshold to accept any ballot and that is part of the reason the rejection rate was 100 times lower than normal?

Please, wake up. Machines are what was supposed to catch Fraudulent Ballots. You really do have a fixation on Sidney. The machines need to be looked at as well as the ballots. To concentrate on one issue and let the machines slide is the end of the United States of America.

[politicianslie]

That has nothing to do with the computer systems used to count the ballots.

They DEFINITELY did both. When faced with a massive Trump landslide, they went for it all after the algorithms were hopelessly overloaded.

.

.

This is the Michigan County where approximately 6000 votes were taken from Trump and given to China Joe.

[Alberta's Child]

Let’s think about this rationally instead of just taking the zany “computers changed the vote counts” nonsense at face value:

1. Suppose I voted in a precinct where 1,000 ballots were cast — 600 for Trump and 400 for Biden.

2. After the voting was done, “the computer changed the vote count” — and the posted result was 600 for Biden and 400 for Trump. This means the computer allegedly took 200 of Trump’s votes and gave them to Biden.

3. If this actually happened, then a hand recount of the paper ballots would immediately expose the computer fraud.

4. And if, as some other FReeper suggested, the computer switched the votes AND someone destroyed 200 Trump ballots and created 200 fake Biden ones ... then there would be no need for the computer to be rigged to do anything at all except an actual count of the ballots.

I will say it again: This is not a COMPUTER issue ... it’s a BALLOT issue.

[Alberta's Child]

Ballots don’t have signatures on them. In this country we go to great lengths to ensure ballot secrecy — which means there is no way to link a ballot to an individual voter when it is passed through a machine.

[BushCountry]

Ballots don’t have signatures on them. In this country, we go to great lengths to ensure ballot secrecy — which means there is no way to link a ballot to an individual voter when it is passed through a machine.

Except, there is a way to find invalid votes. There are supposedly ballots with perfect ovals (impossible), the ink that can be sampled (test if from the same source), different paper (phony ballot printing), chain of custody issues (several unsigned blocks of votes), there are dozens of ways to check if the ballot itself is valid even without a signature.

[BushCountry]

I will say it again: This is not a COMPUTER issue ... it’s a BALLOT issue.

Your whole premise falls apart if they manufacture ballots after the fact to match the machines. Counting pieces of paper means nothing. USB drives are missing, stacks of ballots with no chain of custody, vote totals quicker than the machines can process them, machines acceptable to hacking, machines that skewed the vote count in earlier elections where they had to count receipts. Both ballots stuffing and machine problems exist. The cheaters were able to walk and chew gum at the same time.

[meyer]

It’s a computer AND ballot issue.
Leave no fraudulent stone unturned, and understand what is at stake.
If stolen by the left, there will no longer be an election in the United States, because there will no longer be a country.

[Alberta's Child]

Give it up, dude. Every time you post another response on this thread you actually reinforce my point. Every example you cite of “computers changing ballots” is actually a case of election fraud involving illegitimate ballots. — which is what I’ve been saying all along.

[BushCountry]

Have they counted the ballots in Philly? No. Are they going to? No

The machines they use do not count ballots correctly, see below. So, yes machines are part of the problem.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-pennsylvania-machines-ex/exclusive-philadelphias-new-voting-machines-under-scrutiny-in-tuesdays-elections-idUSKBN23828J

[Alberta's Child]

Some ExpressVote XL machines incorrectly recorded votes for several candidates in the November election, prompting the county to count backup paper receipts to identify the correct winners, according to Maudeania Hornik, chair of the Northampton Election Commission.

Even the link you posted there reinforces my point. If the machine isn’t working properly or is rigged to make one candidate the winner, a hand recount will identify the problem immediately.

The Trump campaign will not bother with a recount in Philadelphia because recounting fraudulent ballots isn’t going to identify the real problem. If Joe Biden got 800,000 fraudulent votes in PA, recounting them 50 times isn’t going to change the result.