TRUMP WON SO BIG IN WISCONSIN that Democrats Needed 89% State Turnout to Nullify His Landslide, Eek Out a Victory and Steal the Election

thegatewaypundit.com ^ | Nov 5 2020 | Jim Hoft

[Morgana]

President Trump outperformed his 2016 totals in Wisconsin by 200,000 votes!!

That is a MASSIVE NUMBER!!

It was a HUGE Victory for President Trump in Wisconsin!

This is a HUGE NUMBER!

President Trump had a sizable lead in Wisconsin but Wednesday morning Sleepy Joe somehow took the lead.

Overnight Wisconsin had a huge dump of votes all for Biden, notice the blue line below:

We dug further and found from the official Wisconsin website there are 3,684,726 active registered voters.

So — We are supposed to believe Wisconsin had an 88% turnout!! Something NEVER SEEN BEFORE IN RECENT US HISTORY!

And they’re still counting votes.

And this did not include the additional votes to other candidates.

[shotgun]

Is that a real photo or a meme?

[doorgunner69]

Not a thing will be done by the spineless GOP.

[mdmathis6]

The supremes will have to note the nearly 90 percent of the voter turn out in some areas(what do you think happens when mail ins, absentees and in persons get over 100 percent of registered voters in certain precincts?) versus official registered voters. A precinct by precinct recount versus who was actually in the precinct and voted(mail or in person) is in order.

They won’t be able to do it by the safe harbor dates and the legislatures will have to act. They’ll get Biden up over a little...try to declare victory...there will be recounts and lots of votes thrown out. Trump will be accused of being a sore loser...big fights and protests as the recounts go on and the ballots and mail ins actually get looked at at the precinct level especially if the counts are close.

Patriot Americans...it it time for a “Battle for Athens” moment...just like what happened in a small county in the 40’s when the Dems tried to cheat...the local men took up arms!

Trump can’t just ask for recounts, he needs to ask for a precinct by precints inspection of ballots, mailins while checking forensically as to who actually voted in the precincts vs the amounts of votes at hand. That will tell the real story!

The higher courts know this and I think they fear what will happen when people find out which is why they will try to punt on the triggering forensic counts as long as they can. It is why Michigan stopped the Stein recount when they found ballot boxes marked “306 votes” with only 51 ballot in them. The fraud in 2020 will be in precincts with near or over 100 percent turn outs with multiple people having voted in various precincts either by mail and in person. Many won’t be verified and have to be thrown out. People will riot and fight. Trump will not go away!

[grey_whiskers]

Went ahead and pulled the data for MI voters from here: https://michiganvoters.info/download.html

Pulled it into a PostgreSQL database and here is the age distribution:

postgres=# select count(*), year_of_birth from mi_voters_2020 group by year_of_birth order by year_of_birth asc;
count | year_of_birth
————+-———————
4 | 1900
1 | 1903
2 | 1904
2 | 1909
4 | 1911
6 | 1912
14 | 1913
15 | 1914
42 | 1915
55 | 1916
123 | 1917
264 | 1918
332 | 1919
673 | 1920
1142 | 1921
1642 | 1922
2494 | 1923
3627 | 1924
5435 | 1925
6857 | 1926
9155 | 1927
11281 | 1928
13954 | 1929
17609 | 1930
20005 | 1931
22725 | 1932
24906 | 1933
29809 | 1934
34989 | 1935
38670 | 1936
43381 | 1937
49501 | 1938
51475 | 1939
57327 | 1940
65720 | 1941
78813 | 1942
82562 | 1943
78886 | 1944
81551 | 1945
101685 | 1946
116319 | 1947
112731 | 1948
114968 | 1949
116194 | 1950
122577 | 1951
125117 | 1952
124246 | 1953
126555 | 1954
124443 | 1955
124384 | 1956
121464 | 1957
114698 | 1958
109708 | 1959
106075 | 1960
101770 | 1961
96214 | 1962
93142 | 1963
88226 | 1964
80772 | 1965
76811 | 1966
72823 | 1967
71072 | 1968
71748 | 1969
72844 | 1970
66806 | 1971
59720 | 1972
56032 | 1973
55343 | 1974
54165 | 1975
52434 | 1976
54175 | 1977
53497 | 1978
53799 | 1979
53874 | 1980
52318 | 1981
52141 | 1982
48770 | 1983
48420 | 1984
48398 | 1985
46520 | 1986
46141 | 1987
45357 | 1988
45977 | 1989
45347 | 1990
41979 | 1991
40118 | 1992
37943 | 1993
38046 | 1994
35457 | 1995
35827 | 1996
35832 | 1997
37138 | 1998
35504 | 1999
36584 | 2000
35043 | 2001
11892 | 2002
(96 rows)
Someone should try and correlate this against the general age population of MI. 120 year olds voting doesn’t seem very legitimate...

Also if anyone else wants to know anything else, let me know - I can run any SQL query on the data

[Dan in Wichita]

Hate to nitpick, but the Kennedy/Nixon election was in 1960, not 1962.

[Ciexyz]

I know a poll worker at a local polling station who said they got 60% turnout, including mails in and absentee ballots.

[Ancesthntr]

“The difference?

Republican governor.”

---

Another thing to consider is that they knew that OH wouldn’t be close at all, so why bother to cheat? Plus, there were clearly several other candidate states that would serve the same purpose.

[Kaisersrsic]

Two of Trumps best counties in Wisconsin were:

Washington: 86,882 Votes. 94,481 Registered Voters. Turnout = 91.9%

Waukesha: 263,500 Votes. 291,183 Registered Voters. Turnout = 90.5%

There might be fraud, but statewide turnout of 89% is not proof.

[dfwgator]

The point is, I suspect if you did a historical analysis, of the States of: Wisconsin, Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania, they would closely correlate with each other in every election. It’s highly unlikely you would see an outlier, like Ohio was.

[allwrong57]

carry guns, not signs and be ready to use them.

[stratman1969]

Florida was called and algore called to concede. He was on his way to deliver a concession speech when he was told by one of his advisers not to, that the race was closer. He called Bush back and took back his concession. At no time did Gore lead. Recount after recount showed Bush winning and Gore demanded more recounts. I remember this well. I discovered FR in the 2000 protests of the attempt by Gore to steal Florida.

[FroggyTheGremlim]

Not a thing will be done by the spineless GOP.

Well, we all prayed to God. I know I did.

[goldbux]

Title: Eke not eek.

Illiteracy! Eek!

[Flick Lives]

The higher courts know this and I think they fear what will happen when people find out which is why they will try to punt on the triggering forensic counts as long as they can. It is why Michigan stopped the Stein recount when they found ballot boxes marked “306 votes” with only 51 ballot in them.

The press for years has had a stock retort, claiming there is no widespread voter fraud and Trump has provided no evidence. It's time to expose the voter fraud. All of it.

[mdmathis6]

Now that number is what one might expect in a heavier turn out general election.(pro Dem or Pro-Pubbie).

[UnwashedPeasant]

"89% State Turnout"

If the voter rolls have not been purged recently, many of 89% are dead or moved.

I think I read that one voter was 170 years old, so the rolls might never have been purged.

[philman_36]

How is it with States like Texas and Florida with much larger populations, got their counts down the night of the election?

Because their State election laws are different.
You know, those laws that were recently changed in numerous States right before this election due to...cough, cough...the corona virus.

election law changed

[mdmathis6]

And there will be your fraud....take out the fraud votes and Trump wins. A forensic recount of ballots vs sealed boxes and as compared with registration recods of each precinct.

These people have to know these will be recounted with the election in Wisconsin that close. The courts can’t claim(differences don’t matter in the final counts but they do in this case)...if they try then the legislature will have to take a look.

[mdmathis6]

Well if there is no evidence of fraud then no one will mind if we all have a look...you know for educational purposes...”Trust but Verify”!

[Trump Girl Kit Cat]

I would like to know the voter turn out in FL., TEXAS, OHIO, ect. Do ANY of these states have and counties with 85-90% turnout ANY???