You surely cannot be referring to this Tulsi Gabbard.
Posted on 01/25/2020 5:10:13 AM PST by EyesOfTX
You go, Tulsi. – I’ve consistently called Tulsi Gabbard one of the two actual interesting candidates in the Democrat presidential field, along with Andrew Yang. That’s not because I agree with either of those two about much, but because they are the only two people in the race who actually speak their own minds rather than just parroting talking points written and handed to them by staffers on any given day.
Of course, the relative independence of mind displayed by Gabbard is one of the main reasons why she and Yank literally had zero chance of really becoming any kind of force in the race, since the Democrat nominee will ultimately be decided either by a brianwashed voter base or, in the case of a split convention, the party bosses who brainwashed them.
All that having been said, I greeted the news that Gabbard had sued the pantsuit off the Pantsuit Princess this week with great joy and amusement. Gabbard is seeking $50 million in damages for the Coughing Crook’s allegation that the Hawaii Congresswoman and Major in the Army National Guard is a “Russian agent.” Of course, this is an accusation that the Grasping Grifter has leveled at a wide array of her tormentors since her 2016 campaign went down in flames, one so scurrilous that no one outside of the corrupt news media takes it seriously.
But obviously was highly offended by the Hacking Hag’s accusation, which was made a few months ago, and initially responded by demanding a retraction. Since that was not forthcoming, she decided to file a defamation suit, and it’s hard to blame her for doing so.
Good for her. While she probably has little chance of prevailing, this is a tactic that more people who are attacked by Democrat politicians and their media toadies need to be employing. There needs to be a cost for this kind of scurrilous behavior, and the only way to really cost these people is through their pocketbooks. If nothing else, Gabbard’s litigation will cost the Fainting Felon thousands of dollars in attorney’s fees.
And hey, if the other side thinks you’re getting some traction with the court, they may even offer to settle for millions, as CNN recently did in the defamation suit brought by Nicolas Sandmann and the Covington Catholic school. $25 million is real money for a fake news network that barely registers in the ratings anymore.
This is the kind of thing Republicans need to be doing – finding creative ways to exact a cost from the Democrats and their media hacks for all the outright lies they continue to spread. Every member of the Trump family and Trump cabinet should have defamation suits filed against CNN and MSNBC and their on-air talent like Fredo Cuomo and Rachel Maddow.
After all, the Democrats have zero reservations whatsoever using government money to hire highly-paid lawyers to corrupt our political system; witness the way they have used a vast team of Lawfare-affiliated contract lawyers to concoct and manage their impeachment scam against President Trump. The Democrats have also used the Lawfare people to tie up major Presidential executive orders and regulatory actions in the courts for months on end throughout this administration. It’s a very effective tactic, even though they pretty much always lose in the end, when the anti-constitutional decisions issued by their Obama-appointee federal judges generally get overturned by appellate courts or the Supreme Court. The bad guys lost again this week with the finalization of the Administration’s revised Waters of the United States regulation, but delay is the goal.
On the conservative side, however, things are different. Other than the various defamation suits brought by Sandmann and his lawyers, the most visible efforts to use the courts to police Democrat abuses come from the folks at Judicial Watch. Judicial Watch leader Tom Fitton and his folks do great work, but it’s like a David vs. Goliath battle that’s being fought in that arena.
Conservatives simply must become more active in this area and develop an effective counter-strategy to Lawfare’s activities, if only as a defensive strategy in the event of the election of another Democrat to the presidency. As things stand today, Democrat politicians and their toadies in the corrupt media are free to make any accusation they want, no matter how scurrilous and unfounded it may be, without consequence.
Ironically, Tulsi Gabbard, a Democrat presidential candidate, and Nick Sandmann, a high school student, are trying to show them the way. Is anyone watching and learning?
That is all.
She would probably have trouble retaining her congressional seat in Hawaii if she flipped to Republican because the 50th state is so far-left.
My point was that “Russian asset” isn’t really defamatory, because it can mean “unwittingly useful idiot.” Compare that with “Russian agent,” which was used in the article. Agent implies willful activity, likely controlled from abroad. I think that’s more defamatory, but isn’t what was reported.
Incidentally, Schiff and his merry band have essentially claimed that Trump is Putin’s “agent” in the sense of willful cooperation rather than being unwittingly useful.
Hillary sux; I love the addition of Hacking Hag to the more commonly used Coughing Crook. But this case goes nowhere and is rather pointless, IMHO.
Seems Blockmons been collecting names for rod ham.
I don’t think the point is to win in court.
I think the point is to gain attention. It worked.
Told? LOL. I was there.
You surely cannot be referring to this Tulsi Gabbard.
She votes with Nasty 95% and supported her as speaker.
No way! Nobody in their right mind would allow you to own a gun, never mind gather with sane gun owners.
“She is very liberal and “progressive”.”
...and the literal translation for progressive, is Socialist.
...and that alone makes her worthy of the coughing gas bag naming her a Russian Asset, or whatever Hillary called her.
“How about suing a sanctuary city for wrongful death”
I wouldn’t sue the city. They would be more than happy to pay off the suit with taxpayer dollars. Sue the individuals.
Sorry. But as a former liberal it’ll be a cold day in Hell before some big government, open borders socialist with lipstick teaches me anything. Conservatives need to get their heads out of their butts and stop mooning over Tulsi Gabbard.
Tulsi does speak her mind. And tomorrow she will speak someone else’s. Her word is as good as a gallon of year old milk. She only sued Hillary to get her name in the paper. Not a prayer of seeing a dime. Gross comparison to Nick Sandman who is precisely the opposite. Doesn’t want the publicity and actually had a case and won.
She has some on our side perplexed.
She talks a good game but she is as Leftist as any other Rat running for POTUS.
Tucker Carlson is enamored by her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.