Posted on 07/24/2019 5:53:11 PM PDT by jfd1776
In the summer of 2016, the voters of the United Kingdom decided to Brexit, and reclaim their rightful sovereignty.
Their Conservative Party prime minister disagreed with this decision (some conservative, huh?), so he stepped down, giving the party a chance to pick someone else to accomplish the people’s will.
They chose Theresa May, whose heart was certainly in the idea of being prime minister, but not in the effort to accomplish Brexit. She spent three years as a failed leader, her term in office doomed from the start, because she took a job without believing in its duties.
Now the British Conservative Party has tried again, selecting the American-born Boris Johnson, a journalist and historian as well as a statesman, as the UK’s next prime minister.
And the European Left couldn’t be happier.
That may sound unlikely, but the fact is, the European establishment may claim to be horrified at Boris Johnson’s electoral victory, but it’s exactly what they hoped for. Ever since Brexit passed, they have worked to make Brexit as painful as possible for the British, because they need to scare any other country out of doing the same. They expect Britain to fail, they want Britain to fail, and they are happy at the unexpected bonus of being able to blame Boris Johnson, a conservative, when the bad news really starts coming.
There’s nothing worse for a neighborhood gang than to see gang members quitting of their own volition, without suffering the consequences. No crime gang can afford for its members to go straight; the gang itself would dissolve.
The EU therefore talked Theresa May into agreeing to postpone any work on trade agreements - with any other country - until after Brexit was completed.
Now, this was an outrage – both for the EU to demand it, and for Ms. May to agree to it. But she agreed, nevertheless.
Membership in the EU eases international trade both within the EU and between the EU and numerous other countries – including Mexico, Japan, South Africa, Egypt, Israel, Chile, and South Korea. When the UK leaves the EU on October 31, it will instantly lose the reciprocal free trade it now enjoys, not only with the rest of the EU, but also with those dozens of other trading partners.
The UK has therefore had every right to spend these past three years negotiating with other trading partners to replace the block of partners it’s losing… but this foolish postponement promise has prevented such accomplishments from occurring.
The European establishment is predicting that the UK will suffer, but what they don’t admit is that they are intentionally working to cause that suffering; by hamstringing Britain’s ability to prepare for its future. It’s exactly like betting heavily on a horserace, then sneaking into the stable and injuring the rival horse before the race begins.
If Britain’s allies have both their own interests and the UK’s at heart, then hopefully, they have spent these past three years preparing for that future, despite Ms. May’s refusal to talk. So, hopefully and presumably, many good countries will be ready to present Free Trade Agreement drafts to Mr. Johnson as soon as he’s willing to direct his team to start working on them.
For Great Britain to negotiate FTAs with the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, that advantageous trade would go a long way in replacing the commerce they currently have with the rest of Europe. And there’s no reason to stop there; numerous other countries that currently have FTAs with Europe would be logical fits for Britain alone, as well. And if they all hit on November 1, the Brexit-related economic shelling will have been largely sidestepped.
So, yes, this difficulty is manageable. The next couple of years will be rough for England, but they don’t have to be nightmares.
The question is whether these other countries have been looking ahead to this day, and have prepared rough drafts to expedite the process once a new prime minister takes office.
And whether Mr. Johnson would open to breaking Ms. May’s foolish promise, and making the most of these remaining months.
These will be a difficult few years; the EU is counting on it. The EU knows that the more painful this breakup is for the UK, the more likely it is that the Conservative party will be destroyed by it.
But that is not a fait accompli. If we allies do the right thing, when November 1 comes along, the no-deal Brexit will usher in a whole replacement package of terrific trading partners. Together, the USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, plus a few other countries outside the commonwealth, would easily replace the EU partnership in which they currently participate.
This story has a lesson, and it’s a lesson as old as human history itself:
Joining the EU’s “fortress Europe idea” was a mistake in the first place, and whatever trouble Mr. Johnson has in his term in office, it truly won’t be his fault. It will be the fault of the fools, years ago, who voted to give up their nation’s sovereignty in exchange for the vague promise that “things would become easier.”
Mr. Johnson has the deck stacked against him, but there is an end in sight. These predictions are so dire that if he just keeps Britain’s head above water for a couple of years, and swiftly works to replace European trade with other lanes, Mr. Johnson will look like a conquering hero.
For nothing succeeds like success. When your own country’s economists predict that you’ll usher in a recession, and you bring prosperity instead, to the establishment’s utter shock, you become a rock star.
Just ask Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump.
So, let’s pray for a successful term in office for Great Britain’s newly elected Prime Minister, and let’s pray too that the special relationship been our two countries is repaired with this election, and that our two nations proper together forever.
Copyright 2019 John F Di Leo
John F Di Leo is a Chicagoland based international trade trainer, actor and writer. His columns are regularly found in Illinois Review.
How does one join ISIS?
How much are the monthly dues?
Do you get a free uniform or do you have to supply your own?
I feel like I must be missing a great joke there, but I don’t get it...
“”reclaim their rightful sovereignty.””
Are they going to send the Muslims back across the channel?
Polexit too soon if they’re smart.
HOORAY Boris!
Not sure it’s even posted to the right thread. :)
But Al’s pretty sharp so there must be a connection and a witty one at that.
We don’t always see eye to eye but he is a great poster on the board.
I hope Boris is as much a man as was Maggie Thatcher.
Wait until Trump gifts Boris a hat saying:
Make Great Britain Great Again!
This idiot thinks Boris Johnson will destroy the Conservative Party? Really?
Umm.... No... I said that the EU establishment thinks that Boris Johnson’s failure will destroy the Conservative party.
That’s why I’m stressing that the allies - USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and other friends - need to be ready to sign a good reciprocal FTA (like USMCA) promptly on Nov 1, so that Johnson’s prime ministership is a success.
MEGA.
We’ve got about three months to prepare now. This government should have been in placec3vyears ago. May’s regime has done untold damage to Britain’s future and economic prospects by sabotaging Brexit the way they have.
1. There is no such thing as British "nationhood" -- there is English, Welsh, Northern Irish and Scottish nationhood, but Britain is composed of England, Scotland and Wales. The united kingdom is composed of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland -- there is no such thing as British nationhood and never has been
2. The voters decided to tell parliament to Brexit - it was an advisory poll. In the UK parliament is sovereign and it decides, not the people
3. "some conservative" -
3.1. Conservative means keeping the status quo - by that reckoninig Cameron wanted to keep the status quo as it was from 1973, which was to stay in the EU/EC - as Thatcher did
3.2. "Conservative" has a different meaning between the UK and the USA
4. Theresa May's first words were "Brexit means Brexit" - her flop was in calling for an election that put her in bed with the DUP - which meant that she couldn't keep NI in a customs union and take the rUK off
5. In no way has the EU "worked to make Brexit as painful as possible" - the EU put out its rules clearly - saying that you can't cherry-pick the 4 freedoms. The graph put out by the EU in 2017 clearly indicated that the UK would have a no-deal Brexit, so they put the cards on the table - oh, you wanted them to break the rules of the club to let the UK have its cake and eat it too? Not going to happen. This was the UK's fault in not preparing for the negotiations and not preparing for anything indeed
6. The EU confederation is no more a gang than the united states of America is a gang
7. The EU talked David Davis - a leading BREXITEER who was the chief negotiator into the agreement on the WA. Furthermore, the UK already concluded trade agreements for post Brexit with Fiji, Switzerland etc.
7. The UK already spent three years negotiating with others and failed
UK signs post-Brexit trade deal with Fiji and PNG
Britain has signed a post-Brexit trade deal with the Pacific islands of Fiji and Papua New Guinea, as the government rushes to sign as many agreements as possible before 29 March.
Signed by the international trade secretary, Liam Fox, the deal eliminates all tariffs on all goods imported from Fiji and Papua New Guinea and will gradually remove around 80% of tariffs on UK exports to these countries.
8. The trade deals with the USA, ANZAC will not in any way replace trade deals with the rest of Europe - the UK is too far away from ANZ except to import lamb and beef - which will be opposed by British farmers. And the UK's chief exports to the rest of Europe was services and partially completed goods (as it was part of the WE supply chain) - that can't be replaced with the US/Canada as a market as New York does the services bit and putting a supply chain across the atlantic doesn't make sense
9. The Tory party is already destroyed, no matter what - after the ensuing chaos of the past 3 years
The Muslims in the UK were imported by the UK directly from the Middle East, from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nigeria
They didn't come from the EU.
Furthermore, those deals will kill BRitish industries - for instance Welsh farmers oppose an FTA with Australia and NZ as that will kill their lamb industry - NZ has economy of scale
And British poultry farmers oppose the FTA with the USA for a similar reason.
these FTAs aren't easy
Journalists, huh? Thanks for posting.
Britain is just as much a nation as Spain, Germany and Italy. This idea of Britain being a union of nations rather than a nation in its own right is a conceit of petty nationalists. I can assure you there are plenty who are fiercly British patriots and view British as their national identity.
Germany is a union of different states - they forcibly got the idea of being a nation under Bismarck and that was exacerbated by the outcome of WWII - but the Bavarians will consider themselves different from Berliners
Scotland, Wales and England are separate and distinct countries, with their own cultures and well-defined borders. They are also arguably separate and distinct nations with largely homogeneous groups of natives (and immigrants).
The UK is, as its initials imply, a United Kingdom of the countries of Scotland, Wales and England, and the region of Northern Ireland.
This idea of the UK being a union of nations is more than just a conceit - remember that England, Scotland, Wales play separately footie and cricket -- I don't see Galicia or Swabia doing that
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.