Trump retweets QAnon conspiracy theorist, via Larry the Cable Guy, to slam the TSA

From a QAnon conspiracy theorist to actor James Woods to comedian Larry the Cable Guy to the leader of the free world. Thus travels information in the age of Twitter and President Trump, who took a late-night swing at a familiar punching bag — the Transportation Security Administration — via a nearly two-year-old video spread by a character on the far fringes of the Internet.

likely to raise new questions about where a president fond of spreading conspiracy theories gets his information.

First clown the Illegal spying was done by unmasking the President etc.
Using the NSA database.
Which is in UTAH

Second you left off a critical part of the rules of grand juries but I’m sure it was just an accident

https://themarketswork.com/2018/04/05/the-uncovering-mike-rogers-investigation-section-702-fisa-abuse-the-fbi/

https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/343785-newly-declassified-memos-detail-extent-of-improper-obama-era-nsa

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/11/a-visit-to-the-nsas-data-center-in-utah/416691/

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure › TITLE V. VENUE › Rule 18. Place of Prosecution and Trial
Rule 18. Place of Prosecution and Trial
Unless a statute or these rules permit otherwise, the government must prosecute an offense in a district where the offense was committed. The court must set the place of trial within the district with due regard for the convenience of the defendant, any victim, and the witnesses, and the prompt administration of justice.

Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules—1979 Amendment

This amendment is intended to eliminate an inconsistency between rule 18, which in its present form has been interpreted not to allow trial in a division other than that in which the offense was committed except as dictated by the convenience of the defendant and witnesses.

28 U.S.C. §1861. This language does not mean that the Act requires “the trial court to convene not only in the district but also in the division
wherein the offense occurred,” as:

There is no hint in the statutory history that the Jury Selection Act was
intended to do more than provide improved judicial machinery so that grand and petit jurors would be random by the use of objective qualification criteria to ensure a representative cross section.

(Do you think a district that went 9 to 1 for Hillary is a “representative cross section?)

TRY AGAIN

PS Uranium1 company is from Utah too

https://www.kuer.org/post/how-tiny-utah-town-got-thrown-real-russia-scandal#stream/0

It actually makes sense to look for answers in Utah.

There’s uranium here.

Also, Utah used to have Uranium One properties, like a processing plant at Shootering Canyon in Garfield County and some idle mines. Even a lease on the town of Ticaboo.

In fact, a Utah state official reviewed the Uranium One deal.

“First clown the Illegal spying was done by unmasking the President etc.
Using the NSA database.
Which is in UTAH”

Sorry, but that’s just some BS excuse the Q-brigade has come up with the justify why Huber is sitting on his butt out in Utah instead doing anything in Washington DC, where all the actual crimes happened (though some of them probably happened in New York or Virginia too). If I commit a crime sitting in my desk in Washington DC, it does not matter that my computer is connected to a database in Utah. The district that has jurisdiction for prosecution is still going to be in Washington DC. You see, in the United States, we prosecute people, not databases.

“Second you left off a critical part of the rules of grand juries but I’m sure it was just an accident...”

“Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure › TITLE V. VENUE › Rule 18. Place of Prosecution and Trial”

As for what you have posted, you apparently don’t understand what it is saying, since it confirms my point, that the grand jury must be convened in the district (not the division, that is something else entirely) where the crime was committed.

Now, if you can’t get a “representative cross section” in a district, the only thing you can do, and this can only be done by the defense attorneys, in the trial phase, which is well past the grand jury phase, is to make a motion for a change of venue. None of that is going to affect the statutorily required venue that the grand jury must convene in.

“Blah blah blah
Heres you ignoring that crimes were committed in Utah”

Oh sure, Hillary and Obama and Clapper and all of their cronies were secretly jetting off to Utah to do all their planning for the coup. I’m sure that’s going to turn out to the be correct and you won’t have to dream up some other load of BS to justify your Q fantasy when Huber has still done nothing in another year’s time.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.