First clown the Illegal spying was done by unmasking the President etc.
Using the NSA database.
Which is in UTAH
Second you left off a critical part of the rules of grand juries but Im sure it was just an accident
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure TITLE V. VENUE Rule 18. Place of Prosecution and Trial
Rule 18. Place of Prosecution and Trial
Unless a statute or these rules permit otherwise, the government must prosecute an offense in a district where the offense was committed. The court must set the place of trial within the district with due regard for the convenience of the defendant, any victim, and the witnesses, and the prompt administration of justice.
Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules1979 Amendment
This amendment is intended to eliminate an inconsistency between rule 18, which in its present form has been interpreted not to allow trial in a division other than that in which the offense was committed except as dictated by the convenience of the defendant and witnesses.
28 U.S.C. §1861. This language does not mean that the Act requires the trial court to convene not only in the district but also in the division
wherein the offense occurred, as:
There is no hint in the statutory history that the Jury Selection Act was
intended to do more than provide improved judicial machinery so that grand and petit jurors would be random by the use of objective qualification criteria to ensure a representative cross section.
(Do you think a district that went 9 to 1 for Hillary is a “representative cross section?)
TRY AGAIN
“First clown the Illegal spying was done by unmasking the President etc.
Using the NSA database.
Which is in UTAH”
Sorry, but that’s just some BS excuse the Q-brigade has come up with the justify why Huber is sitting on his butt out in Utah instead doing anything in Washington DC, where all the actual crimes happened (though some of them probably happened in New York or Virginia too). If I commit a crime sitting in my desk in Washington DC, it does not matter that my computer is connected to a database in Utah. The district that has jurisdiction for prosecution is still going to be in Washington DC. You see, in the United States, we prosecute people, not databases.
“Second you left off a critical part of the rules of grand juries but Im sure it was just an accident...”
“Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure TITLE V. VENUE Rule 18. Place of Prosecution and Trial”
As for what you have posted, you apparently don’t understand what it is saying, since it confirms my point, that the grand jury must be convened in the district (not the division, that is something else entirely) where the crime was committed.
Now, if you can’t get a “representative cross section” in a district, the only thing you can do, and this can only be done by the defense attorneys, in the trial phase, which is well past the grand jury phase, is to make a motion for a change of venue. None of that is going to affect the statutorily required venue that the grand jury must convene in.