Something is Terribly Wrong With The Children’s Clothing Line Caroline Bosmans

LATEST NEWSSomething is Terribly Wrong With The Children’s Clothing Line Caroline Bosmans The website and the Instagram account of this fashion brand are replete with disturbing imagery alluding to the abuse and sexualization of children. Here’s a look at the upsetting world of Caroline Bosmans.

Published 2 hours ago on February 26, 2019 By Vigilant Citizen Something is Terribly Wrong With The Children's Clothing Line Caroline Bosmans SHARE TWEET

Caroline Bosmans is a luxury brand for children that is highly praised in its native Belgium and around the fashion world. Popular amongst the children of the rich and famous (i.e. P. Diddy), the brand is described as “radical and graphic” by fashionistas. Indeed, although Caroline Bosmans creates garments for toddlers and children, it is all about being edgy and fashion-forward.

However, there’s a problem. The world of fashion is sick and twisted. Adding children to the mix is often a recipe for “what the hell is wrong with them”. A prime example is the children’s brand NUNUNU which, as seen in my article Something Is Terribly Wrong With Céline Dion’s “Genderless” Clothing Line, is simply revolting: References to child abuse, the sexualization of children and even all-out satanism.

Sadly, the marketing around Caroline Bosman sends out the same disturbing vibes. Nearly all of the pictures place children in bizarre, oppressive and unpleasant contexts in which lots of telling symbolism is added. Adding to the bad vibes, all of the children in their promotional pics appear to be either sad, upset, traumatized or … dead. In short, the brand is a reflection of the occult elite’s sickening sub-culture of preying on children.

http://spikethenews.blogspot.com/2014/07/the-pedophocracy.html

excerpt:

Thursday, 17 July 2014The Pedophocracy

The Pedophocracy, Part I:
From Brussels ...

David McGowan
August 2001

To the vast majority of Americans, the name Marc Dutroux doesn’t mean much. Drop that name in Belgium though and you’re likely to elicit some very visceral reactions. Dutroux - convicted along with his wife in 1989 for the rape and violent abuse of five young girls, the youngest of whom was just eleven - now stands accused of being a key player in an international child prostitution and pornography ring whose practices included kidnapping, rape, sadistic torture, and murder.
Dutroux was sentenced in 1989 to thirteen years for his crimes, but was freed after having served just three. This was in spite of the fact that, as prison governor Yvan Stuaert would later tell a parliamentary commission: “A medical report described him as a perverse psychopath, an explosive mix. He was an evident danger to society.”
The man who turned Dutroux loose on society, Justice Minister Melchior Wathelet, soon after received a prestigious appointment to serve as a judge at the European Court of Justice at the Hague. Shortly after Dutroux’s release, young girls began to disappear in the vicinity of some of his homes. Though technically unemployed and drawing welfare from the state, he nevertheless owned at least six houses and lived quite lavishly.
His rather lucrative income appears to have been derived from trading in child sex-slaves, child prostitution, and child pornography. Many of his houses appeared to stand vacant, though at least some of them were in fact used as torture and imprisonment centers where kidnapped girls were taken and held in underground dungeons.
Some of Dutroux’s homes were used in this way for several years following his early release, with a growing body of evidence to indicate that fact to the police. True to form though, authorities failed to act on the information, or acted on it in a way that showed either complete incompetence (according to most press reports), or police complicity in the operation (according to any sort of logic).
Police seem to have routinely ignored tips that later proved to be accurate, including a report from Dutroux’s own mother that her son was holding girls prisoner in one of his houses. In addition, key facts were withheld from investigators working on the disappearances and lines of communication were unaccountably broken, inexcusably hindering the investigation...

I DuckDuckGoed Rachel Chandler’s name and a lot of interesting, well, more like disgusting, stuff came up. Sounds like she was brainwashed or made the choice to follow a dark path because of her introduction to all that slime.

It’s so disheartening to see people like Epstein and the Clintons get away with their perverted, criminal conduct.

All I can say is Come, Lord Jesus. These people need to be dragged down into a lake of fire.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.