Posted on 01/04/2019 6:54:05 AM PST by davikkm
Jack Burkman tweets the following –
“The sudden death of my friend 26 year old Bre Payton is beyond strange. She dies just after breaking the story of DOJ wiping the Page-Strozek emails. The Profiling Project may open a major investigation.”
8:22 AM – 2 Jan 2019
twitter.com/Jack_Burkman/status/1080499698744680448?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1080499698744680448&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fnewspunch.com%2Fjournalist-exposed-mueller-wiping-anti-trump-texts-dead%2F
I am not accusing anyone of taking the life of this excellent reporter. Some say she died of the flu, but some do not believe the flu took her life.
She had just broken a story on Mueller allegedly wiping messages between disgraced former FBI agent Peter Strzok and his lover Lisa Page.
I did not have any information on her breaking news story concerning the messages, so I had to research that to report it as truth.
(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...
Ken Starr and Henry Hyde stopped investigations of Vince Foster as a homicide linked to the Clintons.
The impeachment and trial was all UniParty theater, to give the clueless rubes a Pyrrhic Victory while ensuring that nothing that could actually remove Bill Clinton - e.g., MURDER - came to light: “It was just sex.”
Read Miguel Rodriguez’s resignation letter, citing his evidence, and accusing Ken Starr of shutting down his investigation into the death of Vince Foster as a murder tied to the Clintons. Then read David Schippers describe how Henry Hyde shut down (the day after midterms 1998) his multiple homicide investigations (including Vince Foster) tied to the Clintons, and left him to live in perpetual fear of Hillary’s vengeance.
Starr and Hyde: treacherous Republicans. Rodriguez and Schippers: honorable Democrats. It disgusts me the way people like Limbaugh fawn over Starr.
It is all a sick game. I doubt Trump has a single rock-solid ally in all of DC.
Sadly, there are persons on this site who trust unConstitutional organizations like the FDA, complicit with ruthless corporations in Big Pharma, and who do not believe in personal liberty or natural law.
I have garnered science awards (emphasis on biology), have a genius IQ, and have been studying these things since 1993. I seriously doubt you can make the same claims.
People like you never explain why, if vaccines are efficacious and reliable, there needs to be - or is any conservative justification for - a semi-secret Vaccine Court set up by the government to protect Big Pharma from liability for all the wrongful deaths from vaccines.
By the bye, I do not start these arguments. I believe in personal freedom. Arrogant, ignorant people like you do start them, with your gratuitous ad hominem attacks.
I suggest you educate yourself on Louis Pasteur and Antoine Bechamp (among others) before making further attacks.
The flu weakens you and your immune system and then the meningococcal bacteria gets a toehold and it is virulent and fast. Apparently 1 in 10 people are carriers who seem to be immune to it.
And the local health department will investigate to find everyone who may have had close contact with her so they can be given prophylactic antibiotics.
I understand.
Sadness over both of them.
Unfortunately, illnesses can happen unexpectedly and rapidly. Jim Henson died in about 48 hrs due to pneumonia. Usually, pneumonia is treated as an out patient.
“Unfortunately, illnesses can happen unexpectedly and rapidly. Jim Henson died in about 48 hrs due to pneumonia. Usually, pneumonia is treated as an out patient.”
People had forgotten that pneumonia can still kill very quickly. Doctors decided that Henson died from toxic shock caused by bacterial pneumonia.
The vaccine court is a way of limiting liability for medical care for the same reason we have statutory caps on liability for medical malpractice - uncapped liability threatens the supply of care. Do medical malpractice liability caps lead you to believe doctors are quacks? At it’s worst, it’s an example of regulatory capture by an industry, not proof that vaccines aren’t efficacious and reliable. Vaccines can work most of the time and still hurt people.
I’m sure you’re smarter than me, but unfortunately, as we’ve seen time and time again, raw intellectual firepower isn’t coextensive with rational, evidence-based thinking.
1918 flu was H1N1. The highest mortality rate for that flu was the 25-26 yr old cohort. And that’s because H1N1 leverages your immune system against you, the stronger it is the more likely you are to suffer a cytokine storm and suffocate.
True.
Pneumonia can be a killer.
Have the Autopsy results come in yet?
A healthy 26 Year Old dying like that insures an Autopsy is done.
Indeed. Body over- reacts. Hyper immune reaction.
Sad.
My aunt died of diphtheria at age 11. Horrible way to die. They had no diphtheria vaccines at that time. My grandfather was a very godly man. He was not able to pray out loud for a year after her death. Overcome with heavy grief.
“An isolated case of swine flu absent a larger, wide spread outbreak is extremely rare”
A baseless claim.
An epidemic is unlikely because we have an H1N1 vaccine now unlike 1918. H1N1 vaccine is 65% effective, enough to break the chain of transmission.
But it is still dangerous to those who do catch it. Contra your claim the most deadly flus are the hybrid swine and avian flus.
Most of the people who get flu vaccinations get them because they are in a high risk category. In other words, the flu vaccine is used to prevent a high risk individual from being infected from the non vaccinated general population as opposed to providing a universal vaccination of the population to provide blanket herd immunity to that entire population.
FWIW, you need to check your 65% percent vaccine effectiveness number because it does not jive with my numbers, which come from the CDC. Flu vaccine effectiveness varies from year to year depending on the particular strain in play and how effective the vaccine is against that strain. For the last decade or so, the effectiveness has rarely been better than 50% and for some years it has been in the 10-30% effective range.
“FWIW, you need to check your 65% percent vaccine effectiveness number because it does not jive with my numbers, which come from the CDC.”
Then you must be looking at effectiveness for all flu vaccines and not just H1N1.
” VE estimates from 2004-2015 found average VE of 33% (CI = 26%–39%) against illnesses caused by H3N2 viruses, compared with 61% (CI = 57%–65%) against H1N1 and 54% (CI = 46%–61%) against influenza B virus illnesses. “
VE = vaccine effectiveness
CI = Confidence Index
The above paragraph from the CDC lists H1N1 at 61% VE with a CI range of 57% to 65%. Found here:
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/qa/vaccineeffect.htm
With a pillow over his face, investigation over the phone(?) and NO autopsy - YES. But then again, fatdaddy, you have always proven to be a stupid $h1Te - a socialist dem I suspect.
Yeah, I just can’t understand a fat 80 year old dropping dead like that.
Well since you’re a genius and all, who are we to disagree?
It’s h1n1 virus. A lot of people got it in 2009. I think one of my kids got it at a summer camp that year in New Hampshire. They closed the camp sent everyone home.
I believe colleges now require vaccinations prior to attending.
Note: this topic is from . Thanks davikkm.
79
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.