Posted on 12/07/2018 2:37:45 PM PST by grundle
According to this news article that was just published by CNN, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweeted the following:
I have noticed that Junior here has a habit of posting nonsense about me whenever the Mueller investigation heats up.
Please, keep it coming Jr – its definitely a very, very large brain idea to troll a member of a body that will have subpoena power in a month.
Have fun!
Ocasio-Cortez is threatening to use her power as a federal lawmaker to punish someone who exercised his first amendment right to free speech.
Such a threat is a violation of House Ethics rules.
The Congressional Committee on Ethics states:
https://ethics.house.gov/campaign-activity/campaign-contributions-and-contributors
Members and staff are not to take or withhold any official action on the basis of the campaign contributions or support of the involved individuals, or their partisan affiliation. Members and staff are likewise prohibited from threatening punitive action on the basis of such considerations.
(Okay, they can't count too well, either!)
Baby Bug Eyes is 28. San Fran Nan is closing in on 80. Nancy is an easy mark for a heart attack or a stoke. The old hag has had some moments of TIA’s(transiscemic attack, a small stoke stoke) in the past year or two.
A classic bait and switch advertisement.
Told her I couldn't wait for the next remake of the Wizard of Oz as she would cast as the perfect Scarecrow...wouldn't even have to act......"If she only had a brain...."
Violations of Ethical StandardsViolations of ethical standards may lead to various penalties. The U.S. Constitution authorizes each House of Congress to punish its Members for disorderly behavior and, with the concurrence of two thirds, to expel a Member. The House may also punish a Member by censure, reprimand, condemnation, reduction of seniority, fine, or other sanction determined to be appropriate.
A House rule specifically authorizes the Standards Committee to enforce standards of conduct for Members, officers, and employees; to investigate alleged violations of any law, rule, or regulation pertaining to official conduct; and to make recommendations to the House for further action.
Committee rules reflect the Committees authority to issue letters of reproval and to take other administrative action.
House rules further provide that either with approval of the House or by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of its Members, the Committee may report substantial evidence of violation by a Member, officer, or employee to the appropriate federal or state authorities.
Some standards of conduct derive from criminal law. Violations of these standards may lead to a fine or imprisonment, or both. In some instances, such as conversion of government funds or property to ones own use or false claims concerning expenses or allowances, the Department of Justice may seek restitution. Among the sanctions that the Committee may recommend be imposed upon a Member in a disciplinary matter is the -[d]enial or limitation of any right, power, privilege, or immunity of the Member if under the Constitution the House may impose such denial or limitation.
The Committee may also recommend sanctions be imposed by the House against an officer or employee of the House. Such sanctions could include dismissal from employment, reprimand, fine, or other appropriate sanction.
Charges of unethical conduct can be evaluated only on a case-by-case basis.
As the Committee has noted, ― it was for the very purpose of evaluating particular situations against existing standards, and of weeding out baseless charges from legitimate ones, that this committee was created.
Source: HOUSE ETHICS MANUAL- page 3
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.