Posted on 06/19/2018 4:44:30 AM PDT by w1n1
Yeh, I think most gun enthusiasts understand how powerful both these handguns are.
For the non-gun educated, the term .357 magnum itself is enough to bring fear into their minds.
Both the Glock 10mm and the .357 magnum are serious personal defense calibers.
Which caliber is best against real muscles or something that simulates it?
YouTuber mark3smle tests this out by demonstrating which caliber is capable of against a ballistic gel.
Ballistic gelatin is a testing medium scientifically correlated to swine muscle tissue (which in turn is comparable to human muscle tissue), in which the effects of bullet wounds can be simulated.
This is probably what you need to understand, is that the ballistic gel gives you an idea of the path of the bullet when it penetrates a target tissue that is similar to real muscle.
These two powerful cartridges penetration are quite impressive. Traditionally, the .357 magnum has a long track record of a mini-hand cannon for personal defense.
In mark3smle test you can see the .357 penetration at 22 inches.
The 10mm is a newcomer in the hunting world, but has become a big player in the market for bear hunters or anyone needing extra power. See the rest and full footage of 10mm vs .357 Magnum here.
Of the same weight and velocity two different diameter bullets the smaller diameter bullet penetrates further.
Of course there are other factors like how the bullet is constructed which could give more or less expansion, if any. A bullet that bumps up quickly will slow the bullet down faster, imparting more knockdown energy.
If a bullet passes threw a target without expansion it leaves a pencil hole clear through. If its through the vitals youre dead. If a bullet expands rapidly in the vitals youve dead quicker but still dead. If a bullet expands upon impact (varment loads) on a large target like a human. It imparts all its energy right that away and knocks you down. But if it doesnt hit the vitals you probably will survive it.
I could go on.
Norway issues the 10mm to soldiers for protection from polar bears.
The 10mm was taken away from the FBI because too many of its members couldnt handle it.
I love my 10.
I could go on.
Indeed. Its why the subject is so fascinating to me.
L
Hell first they lowered the power of the 10 to 40S&W. Then the little girls they are hiring for agents found this too rough. Now theyre down to 9MM. .
Amen.
Also your bedside piece.
Awoken in the middle of the night. Is there a round in the chamber? safety off? magazine in and locked?
And just the stress of the situation. You need the foolproof piece with the long stiff trigger pull. No 'it went off accidentally' stuff.
.357 with .38+P hollowpoints. (save your ears)
Just went to a local toy store to buy powder. No powder. I usually buy it on line but its not worth paying hazmat fees for just 1 lb I want to try. If I like the results Ill buy 8 lbs. now Ill work my way to another store. But not today.
I buy bulk, too. Got some milsurp Winchester stuff and stocked up on Bullseye, Unique, Varget, and some CFE. Not enough to require a purpose built magazine, tho.
Buy cheap, stack deep. Right?
LOL.
Revolvers are also simpler to shoot, and in some cases, safer - You don't have to worry about a round being chambered or not. And dealing with a failure to fire is simpler, as well as not having to deal with a jam.
But you really can't go wrong with either.
Mark
I love my 10.
Neither could some of the guns! A buddy's Delta Elite wound up with a cracked frame (stainless,) and Colt said it was the "factory ammo," and told him to buy another.
Mark
I actually became very fond of Scott Powders, and had great luck shooting pins using "Royal Scott" in both my .45auto and .44mag pin loads.
Mark
Learned some good lessons via Underwood.
I bought a glock 20 and wanting to get the most out of it, I ordered Underwood's full power loads (as opposed to the light loaded 10mm, giving .40S&W velocities everyone else is marketing).
. Now don't get me wrong, i love glocks and i respect the 10mm, but for me, the two didn't go well together. There's just not enough mass in a glock to shoot 10mm comfortably. I'm sure a 1911 frame would be a hoot.
Nevertheless, after six rounds, i took it up front and traded it for a 9mm Sig ;-)
Funny, I had the opposite experience, I’ve shot Gov Models for 40 years, I used to wear shooting gloves because they were uncomfortable to shoot. I got the Glock 20 and full power ammo and expected to be beat up. I was surprised that it felt more comfortable than shooting 45 Auto in a steel full sized Colt pistol.
Good point: public safety.
Yes, but that does not really dispute the earlier point: They are not typically in a crowded apartment building shooting through a drywall.
The early Colt Delta Elites had the cracking frame problem, the newer ones dont.
“Pow,Pow,Pow,Pow,Pow,Pow,Pow,Pow,Pow,Pow,Pow,Pow,Pow,Pow,Pow,Pow,Pow.”
A guy who had to hunt man-eating lions (George Adamson, made famous in the book Born Free) was asked about hunting them with a double rifle. “How do you do it?”, he was asked. “Isn’t it dangerous with just two shots?”
“Wait until 10 yards. Don’t miss.”
.38 +P JHP thru a 4” stainless RUGER,
That’s a joy to Shoot!
I had been under the impression that the problem was more due to the high powered 10mm loads initially used. Maybe I'm wrong, but given the original 10mm loads, I seem to recall that the original Bren-10s also had a very short service life. I thought that the ammo manufacturers "toned down" the standard 10mm load, but maybe I'm wrong.
Mark
You should see the magazine!
Either will do the job if you do yours q in terms of shot placement. When I see these X vs. Y comparisons i always have to ask- can you hit anything with either one?
CC
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.