Posted on 12/10/2017 5:08:23 PM PST by Elderberry
In an interview last Friday with “Freedom Friday” host Carl Gallups, Obama birth-certificate lead investigator Mike Zullo revealed for the first time that the “Deep State” prevented a federal investigation of his findings, compiled over a 5+-year period, that the “long-form” birth certificate image posted by the Obama White House in 2011 is a “computer-generated forgery.”
Virtually unknown in the United States prior to the election of Donald J. Trump last year, the term “Deep State” has now been invoked by some newscasters, journalists and commentators as well as by Trump himself through his Twitter account. Left-leaning news outlets reluctantly discussed it beginning in early March, after Trump claimed on Twitter that he and his campaign aides had been “wiretapped” during the final months of the presidential campaign.
On March 9, 2017, Politico Magazine declared, “The Deep State Is a Figment of Steve Bannon’s Imagination,” referring to then-White House Senior Adviser Steve Bannon, now Editor-in-Chief at Breitbart News.
The article begins, featuring a photo of Bannon:
Here’s a handy rule for assessing the credibility of what you’re reading about national security in the Trump era: If somebody uses the term “Deep State,” you can be pretty sure they have no idea what they’re talking about.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
I agree with your recommendation but I feel that nothing will be done to the Obamas even if they find out that he was a total charlatan.
We will be the laughing stock of the world when they find out that some Kenyan jungle bunny screwed the greatest country in the world for a total of eight years. It will be noted in every history book in the world until the end of time. I can hear Obama and the RATS snicker and the rest of the world, too.
Sharon Rondeau is really doing a great job! Wish I had some extra coin to toss at her...
Mr. Lieutenant Quarles Harris:
Shot in the head twice while sitting in his car.
It turns out that that is not true. The Supreme Court in 1886 established something called the "de facto officer doctrine":
"The de facto officer doctrine confers validity upon acts performed by a person acting under the color of official title even though it is later discovered that the legality of that person's appointment or election to office is deficient." - link
Of course, as hundreds of thousands of people have been researching the so-called "birther" theory for ten years, and haven't been able to come up with a single solid piece of evidence for it, that would seem to make it likely that it is just wishful thinking.
Ugh, the female supremes, just ewgh
The theory at the time was Obama’s passport records needed “tidied up”. Then Harris was murdered immediately...dead men tell no tales. Really fishy...and the murder was never solved.
Barack Obama was never for one day a citizen until he was handed a ceremonial passport while serving as US Senator for govt travel. Who knows what story he concocted to get one without documentation. Perhaps he had said his mother gave birth at home in HI and they never sent in to get one. So to speed up the process, the govt gave him one for his upcoming voyage.
So during the campaign, “passport files were tampered with”: Obama’s, Hillary Clinton’s, and John McCain’s, the latter two to throw off the scent. But somebody had to die for it. Poor Lieutenant Harris.
He wasn’t born in Kenya. Had almost nothing to do with his sperm donor. He was born in Canada.
Even Trump is not powerful enough to produce that which does not exist.
Misplaced hope because clearly Obama is unrestricted in speech or action.
This wasn’t from a university. It is from a flyer put out by his publisher. IIRC, it was in print for more than ten years.
And it’s customary for the author to write his own bio. Of course, some flunky came forward claiming she wrote it and was to “blame” for the “errors.”
This is utter BS, the sort I'd expect from a bunch of lawyers.
If I were to go grab a shave and a haircut, pop on an Army uniform, grab a couple of Stars from the PX, and order soldiers to uphold the Constitution's Art. 4 Sec. 4 (guaranteeing protection against invasion) by securing the border, would such orders be legitimate? Note that they are in perfect alignment with the Constitution.
Of course, as hundreds of thousands of people have been researching the so-called "birther" theory for ten years, and haven't been able to come up with a single solid piece of evidence for it, that would seem to make it likely that it is just wishful thinking.
None of the legal challenges got heard; apparently nobody anywhere at anytime has any sort of standing
… because, reasons
.
I suspect you are correct. He probably obtained the documents long before he raised the birther issue in the first place.
He probably has a copy of the real Hawaiian document and knows all the ways the fake document was doctored.
Another reason that Obama wakes up in the middle of night from nightmares about Trump going after him.
If someone is patently ineligible and his administration was a fraud perpetrated by conspiracy, yes that would mean lots of bad things.
Have you read this latest piece of tripe ?
And as usual, Connecticut.
Washington Times articles from 2008.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/apr/19/key-witness-in-passport-fraud-case-fatally-shot/
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/nov/01/security-breach-threatens-passport-applicants/
Follow up 2012 story from the Washington Examiner.
p
In fact a preponderance of evidence has surfaced. It’s just that most people don’t know about it.
First, there is an ~10 month period in Stanley Ann’s life—the exact timeframe when she would have been pregnant and given birth—when no one anywhere admits to having seen her. She simply disappeared off the grid—the only time in her life that is wholly unaccounted for.
Second, it’s been established that during this period SA was not living with her parents or with her supposed husband. In fact, she had no HI address for this timeframe, and the address listed on both the fabricated birth certificate and the birth announcements is one where SA and the baby NEVER lived.
The first verified sighting of Stanley Ann and her newborn was 2,683 miles away from Honolulu. I.e.: the first confirmed sighting of Stanley Ann and her baby was in Seattle.
Sally Jacobs, via a FOIA request, obtained a document in which Obama Sr says the baby will likely be put up for adoption at the Salvation Army home for unwed mothers. There is not and has never been such an establishment in HI, but Seattle is only a stone’s throw from the Salvation Army home for unwed mothers in Vancouver.
Given airline restrictions in 1961, it’s a virtual impossibility that SA gave birth in HI and then rushed the newborn onto a flight for Seattle. [Two independent sources place SA in Seattle in the latter part of August.] If she’d given birth in HI, there would have been no reason to pay the exorbitant cost of relocating to Seattle anyway. Her school and family were in HI, and she knew no one in Seattle.
Add to that the FACT that the BC is fabricated. Three separate eyewitnesses say that what was in Obama’s HI records file was “handwritten.” One witness specifically stated that Obama had no BC on file. The handwritten notes tie in with the many anomalies associated with Obama’s HI records. The likeliest source for them is Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Dunham. After Stanley Ann ended up either opting to keep the baby or being stuck with him, grandma would have gone into action to obtain US citizenship for him. HI made these kinds of under the table transactions easy; hence the handwritten notes and the newspaper birth announcements.
There is a lot more, but that’s the gist of it. The probability that Obama was born in Canada approaches 100%. Having the actual BC probably wouldn’t increase those odds. It’s a near certainty that SA didn’t register (at the home for unwed mothers) under her real name, or list the baby as Barack Obama II. Personally I don’t see the need for the Canadian BC; the evidence speaks for itself.
doesn’t matter...as far as SCOTUS is concerned...nobody has standing
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.