Posted on 10/04/2017 11:16:46 AM PDT by davikkm
A former FBI Special Agent says the profile of Las Vegas shooter, Stephen Paddock is not easily deciphered. “This is not traditional,” said the agent, David Couvertier, who interrogated numerous suspects during his lengthy FBI career. Paddock’s ability to seal himself off is the first clue. Couvertier said Paddock’s career working in the postal service and IRS is telling, also.
Paddock had an uncomfortable childhood being moved from place to place by his Father, who was on the FBI’s MOST WANTED LIST. It must been have been lonely existence for the young man.
Paddock grew up to be a millionaire with a seemingly good life. What went wrong? Did he convert to Islam and follow ISIS? Most likely he was working with ISIS. This attack should not be a surprise, as ISIS had threatened to target Las Vegas some time ago.
Although Islamic terrorist group, ISIS has claimed responsibility for the attack stating Paddock converted to Islam months ago, authorities are saying there is no evidence to prove the lone wolf had any links to the organization. I think in time, they will reveal it was indeed an ISIS related terror attack.
(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...
Every real estate transaction leaves a public record. If he was truly big in real estate investing, he should have a big paper trail and an intrepid researcher should be able to find his name in records all over the place. And so far, that doesn’t seem to be the case at all.
Good points. I’m not optimistic about ever being told the truth about this whole thing.
The man lived the life of an Operator.
An Operator who went bad and decided to join the other side.
“The man lived the life of an Operator”.
Yes, he certainly did. Probably about as perfectly as possible.
Related to this discussion, is there not an isis-antifa alliance?
A Comment here, on last night’s presser: https://hooktube.com/watch?v=Nyfa-A15FeQ
“The thing I noticed most was how aggressive/intimidating they all were about telling the reporters and citizens what WE need to do. They came across as VERY arrogant and threatening, like what they wanted to say was: “don’t you DARE question us!” And: “We’ll tell whatever we want, when we want and you WILL believe it!”
I saw some of that and agree. They used “no conjecture” as a talking point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.