Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun Registration and Confiscation in England and Wales
Gun Watch ^ | 31 October, 2014 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 06/04/2017 7:36:18 AM PDT by marktwain


Guns Hidden from the Government and Confiscated in Wales

The exemplar for restrictive firearms regulation in the United States has been England and Wales.   Some have argued that it was NAZI Germany, but though the 1968 Gun Control Act borrowed heavily from NAZI law, the country and laws that most have referred to has been England.  Wales shares the same laws and Supreme Court as England.   Before the British passed their own restrictive firearms laws, the most restrictive law in the Anglosphere was the one passed in New York City, the infamous Sullivan law of 1911.

The first real study of armed crime and firearms control was done by Colin  Greenwood, Chief Inspector, West Yorkshire Constabulary, in 1972, at the Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge.   Greenwood was somewhat puzzled by the English firearms laws, because they did not appear to have any effect on crime, and very little study had gone into their creation.   Firearms restrictions had been vigorously opposed before the First World War, on the grounds that they infringed on the rights of Englishmen to be armed for their own defense.  The first significant English firearms law was passed in 1920.

From A Study of Armed Crime and Firearms Control in England and Wales by Colin Greenwood, page 246:
How, then, should policy on firearms controls be affected by the facts produced?  The system of registering all firearms to which Section I applies as well as licensing the individual takes up a large part of the police time involved and causes a great deal of trouble and inconvenience.  The voluminous records so produced appear to serve no useful purpose.  In none of the cases examined in this study was the existence of these records of any assistance in detecting a crime and no one questioned during the course of the study could establish the value of the system of registering weapons.
It was not until much later that Greenwood discovered the purpose of the English firearms registration laws.  They were passed to facilitate firearms confiscation in the event of civil unrest or revolution.   From Colin Greenwood, May 15, 2000.  The term "Constitutionalists" below means British Constitutionalists:
Constitutionalists might argue about whether in Britain, Statute law can over-ride the basic principles of the Common Law, but in 1920 the Government of Britain was in fear of revolution and documents such as the. Cabinet Diaries reveal debates about the number of aircraft available for use against insurgents within the British Isles. In that climate, the registration of firearms (other than shotguns) was imposed for the purpose of “ensuring that all arms are available for redistribution to friends of the government”.
Extensive research by Professor Joyce Lee Malcolm buttresses what Colin Greenwood found.    From Guns and Violence, the English Experience, page 162:
Second, the Firearms Act of 1920, which took away the traditional right of individuals to be armed, was not passed to reduce or prevent armed crime or gun accidents.  It was passed because the government was afraid of rebellion and keen to control access to guns.
Widespread door to door searches and confiscations of firearms did not happen in England and Wales for the purpose of turning those arms over to government supporters, though that was the initial purpose of the registration of firearms.   Rather, the searches and confiscations occurred incrementally, over the last hundred years, as the government kept tightening requirements for ownership and made possession of arms ever more expensive and difficult.   The decisions to impose more restrictions were often made in secret and not know to the public until long after the fact.   Malcolm does an especially good job of documenting this process.

If someone tells you that the purpose of gun registration is crime control, that was never the case in England.   Nor has gun registration ever been of any significant use as a crime control measure.

Colin Greenwood and Joyce Lee Malcolm are the two foremost scholars on firearms control in England and Wales.  One can say, with considerable authority, that the purpose of firearms registration in England was always confiscation, even if it occurred incrementally over generations.

©2014 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; confiscation; england; guncontrol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
In light of the recent terror attacks in England, there has been some discussion of the motives for gun control in England. It was because the British elite feared an uprising.
1 posted on 06/04/2017 7:36:18 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“It was because the British elite feared an uprising.”

Which is precisely why our forefathers made the right to bear arms the “Second Amendment”. They knew how important it was in times like these.


2 posted on 06/04/2017 7:46:44 AM PDT by ImNotLying (The Constitution is an instrument for the people to restrain the government...Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

In the olden days every free Englishman was required to have certain weapons in his home and to practice with the bow and arrow each Sunday after church, AND to appear at an “Assize of Arms” so the local lords could know how many armed men they could depend on.

The French, did not trust their serfs when given arms as the serfs then considered themselves free men. As a result, the French preferred Genoese Crossbowmen to back them up.

After gun confiscation and Dunkirk, England prepared to throw back a German invasion with those now standard traditional English weapons, the Garden Hoe, Hay rake and scythe.
Then American citizens decided to “SEND A GUN TO DEFEND A BRITISH HOME!”


3 posted on 06/04/2017 7:48:38 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

They have no reason to change it now. To that sort, terror is just an example of the lower classes preying on the lower classes. “There’s a fox upsetting the chickens! Release the hounds! Tally ho!”


4 posted on 06/04/2017 7:49:10 AM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Run, hide, tell


5 posted on 06/04/2017 7:55:04 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marktwain; PROCON

Ping-Worthy?


6 posted on 06/04/2017 7:57:05 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

“After gun confiscation and Dunkirk, England prepared to throw back a German invasion with those now standard traditional English weapons, the Garden Hoe, Hay rake and scythe.
Then American citizens decided to “SEND A GUN TO DEFEND A BRITISH HOME!””

Yup, the NRA organized a gun collection drive for the UK home defense. I’ve read that about 100,000 guns were sent over.


7 posted on 06/04/2017 7:58:01 AM PDT by snoringbear (E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear

Yup, the NRA organized a gun collection drive for the UK home defense. I’ve read that about 100,000 guns were sent over.


After the war, only a very few were returned. Most were dumped in the Atlantic rather than return them to the United States.


8 posted on 06/04/2017 8:01:33 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
One of my late friends was quite the amateur historian, and he often filled me in on bits of English history which made it easy to see that the Brit powers-that-be were quite willing to screw their own people and those who were on the periphery economically and geographically. I believe some of my own ancestors which include displaced Irish and Scots (as well as Scots-Irish) were "beneficiaries" of the tender mercies of the English ruling class. I knew a little about the Anglo history of denying possession of arms by we mere pissants, but learned something here today.

Mr. niteowl77

9 posted on 06/04/2017 8:06:37 AM PDT by niteowl77 (Trust- but verify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear

And NONE came home...


10 posted on 06/04/2017 8:10:56 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear

And after the war, the Brits destroyed the donated American guns.


11 posted on 06/04/2017 8:17:36 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: niteowl77
The globalist oligarchy is playing a dangerous game. They want the chaos and murder by Moslems, the chaos and revolt of people being murdered indiscriminately by the Moslems and similar manipulated races.

The Oligarchy believe they will hold the superior weapons and remain safely sequestered while the collapse of Western Civilization happens with starvation and disease killing the large majority of the ‘useless eaters’ the oligarchy fears now.

The game being played is 'reduce population to manageable levels' through starvation, chaos, disease and civil war. Some know how to find the oligarchy and end their safety zones.

12 posted on 06/04/2017 8:18:36 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Many years ago I used to read articles by Colin Greenwood. I always thought he was the clearest thinking voice in the gun control debate.

The one point he made over and over was that before gun control, Great Britain, or maybe it was just England, I can’t recall for sure, had less than 5 armed robberies per year.

The reason what he had to say was so important is he destroyed the argument that Britain had a lower murder rate than the U.S. That was supposed to show how effective gun control was.

In fact it was demographics which was the major controlling factor and gun control actually did harm instead of good.


13 posted on 06/04/2017 8:27:37 AM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar; marktwain
Then American citizens decided to “SEND A GUN TO DEFEND A BRITISH HOME!”

Dean, I'd like to see you do a piece on the NRA effort to arm England during WWII because of the Firearms Act of 1920.

14 posted on 06/04/2017 8:29:40 AM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Modern gun control in the U.K. also tended to be a response to whatever was going on in Northern Ireland. The laws that were created and passed in about 1967 that required permits for legally acquiring shotguns was partly inspired by the then recent killing of two British police officers and increasing violence in Belfast and elsewhere in Northern Ireland. The killing of the two police officers sparked public calls for the return of the death penalty that had been abolished in about 1965, and the gun controls enacted then most likely acted as a diversion from such demands.

The continuing IRA related mayhem in the 1970s and 1980s most likely played a role in the 1987-88 legislation (semi autos and pump actions being banned) that had the Hungerford massacre as it’s public excuse.

Thomas Hamilton’s bloody rampage in 1996 in Dunblane that gave the government it’s public excuse to ban almost all pistols and handguns most likely had the Good Friday Peace Accords with the IRA and Sein Fein as an underlying influence as well.


15 posted on 06/04/2017 8:30:26 AM PDT by OttawaFreeper ("If I had to go to war again, I'd bring lacrosse players" Conn Smythe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

Maybe I could do a review of the Old NRA articles on this.

They covered the subject quite well.


16 posted on 06/04/2017 8:51:49 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Maybe I could do a review of the Old NRA articles on this.

I read some back when. I thought that story would do well to highlight the consequences of your post today.

17 posted on 06/04/2017 9:03:06 AM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin; mylife; Joe Brower; MaxMax; Randy Larsen; waterhill; Envisioning; AZ .44 MAG; ..

RKBA Ping List


This Ping List is for all things pertaining to the 2nd Amendment.

FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.

18 posted on 06/04/2017 9:22:56 AM PDT by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

I posted this on Freerepublic a few minutes ago:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3557977/posts

It is about the guns to Britain story.


19 posted on 06/04/2017 9:48:43 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Right in the middle of that photo of the confiscated guns is an 1847 Colt Walker replica, a black powder cap and ball revolver.


20 posted on 06/04/2017 9:53:41 AM PDT by Inyo-Mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson