Posted on 05/29/2017 10:12:26 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
Plagiarism allegations the latest attack on the would-be DHS official
Allegations of academic plagiarism are the latest weapon the left-wingers of the mainstream media are using in an effort to take down Milwaukee County, Wisc., Sheriff David Clarke.
The Lefts politics of personal destruction played no small role in the defeat at the polls last November of Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio (R). More recently, the Left played a role in the departure of top-rated Fox News host Bill OReilly, and now that they smell conservative blood in the water, the character assassins at the George Soros-funded Media Matters for America are stepping up their efforts to force Sean Hannity off the airwaves.
At least 60 million Americans support Sheriff Clarke.
Don’t see anything in the excerpt that merits a trip to the blog. Can’t remember the last time I went there. Is it any good?
Read the summary and don’t fall for clic bait.
If this so called Freeper wants to play, let him post his entire article and discuss it with Freepers pros and cons.
Enough free clic bait for the free loaders.
I totally agree!
See my comment after yours:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3556229/posts?page=4#4
Got it. Thanks bro
Even though his paper was extensively foot noted with all the proper references - the fact that he did not include quotation marks convicts him of some form of academic plagiarism.
Clark: The blah object blah was shown to him by XYX (1);
Academic: “The” blah “object” blah “was shown to him by XYX” (1).
Which is more readable?
The seriousness of the charge provides the convicting evidence ...
Plaigiarism didn’t prevent biden from becoming VP
Note the left acts wins conservatives babble.
Plagiarism comes naturally to liberals and is not only accepted, but expected. No so with right wing Democrats like Clark who must be held to a higher standard per media regulation.
GOP still playing the G Bush Jr game of never hitting back after an attack. Hit back hard and destroy them! If the don’t mind being labelled liars, cheats and you name it, find out what they really don’t like as a label and use that.
The left hates Plagiarism, except when it’s done by Biden or Martin Luther King.
Why don’t you ever comment here, Sean_Anthony?
Is it because Free Republic is merely a funnel that feeds eyeballs to Canada Free Press, and dollars into your pocket?
You know it is, but what does it matter? You’ll never read this reply.
“The left hates Plagiarism, except when its done by Biden or Martin Luther King.”
Surprising since MLK was a Republican. Probably because most dems think because he was black he was naturally a dem.
Some here resent the source being presented. I certainly don’t. The topics and commentary provided in these postings (while I don’t normally go to a source provided) in any event I find welcome and such complaints frivolous and dismissable.
Clarke gained his “notoriety” because he was one of the few who struck out at Obama. Obama in case FR’s forget through his abuse of “The Bully Pulpit” beginning with the Zimmerman Trial. Began using the “Pulpit” assisted by a compliant media in creating “black victims” out of blacks engaged in a criminal activity. They were portrayed as innocent victims of an over reacting legal authority.
In the Zimmerman trial by claiming the attacker of a black Hispanic neighborhood security guard in which the attacker was killed over a struggle of the guards gun. Obama claimed the attacker “could have been his son” and later Obama himself. The result was around 20 or so assaults by members of black gangs on non blacks which ended in death (murdered) or serious injury. One of which was an Australian, Christopher Lane here in the US on a scholarship who was murdered by members of the Cripts as he was jogging near their neighborhood.
While Clarke never cited that specific example he did stand out as one of the very few who courageously condemned this effort by the Obama regime in dividing US . And encouraging members of that group (in this case blacks) resist the police when attempting to execute their legal authority.
Even though his paper was extensively foot noted with all the proper references - the fact that he did not include quotation marks convicts him of some form of academic plagiarism.
He didn’t include quotes because he wasn’t supposed to. Every school/professor has their own way of doing footnotes/quotes. He did it the way he was supposed to, and the school has said he did.
So he can have Biden’s job then. /s
yes i know, but he’s quilty anyway. its the accusation that counts not the rules ...
The Libtards went after Crowley book as plagiarism to discredit her, so she wouldn’t be on Trump team. That is standard lie used by left to make people distrust a conservative! Many things sound similar, but do not ‘plagiarism’ make!
This onslaught of fake statements is to keep country confused and to doubt this Administration. The whole concept is to get Trump out. As conservatives we need to ignore this bunch of divisive people, who have tried to destroy our country! UNTIL the left can show some respect for Trump being elected, it is best to consider all they say as untrustworthy!
Time for all the nonsense to be ignored or prosecuted!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.