Just some opinions on climate change etc...

GraceG

[pepsionice]

One of the Carlson points which I always find interesting is that you can readily point out in the past one-million years....50 big climate changes of a catastrophic nature.

Not just a thousand, or ten-thousand people dying.

As he suggests...man might be able to do some minor things, but until we acknowledge the 50 events and how society came very close to dying out with no inter-action by mankind...only then can we move ahead.

Carlson does point out, and I readily agree with that logic, that we ought to clean up our rivers, lakes and streams...and try to lessen air pollution. I think on those points....he’s right. Lot of constructive things that we can do without creating a fake science.

[Yosemitest]

Don't forget the effects of changes in the Earth's Orbital Plane, Tilt, and Wobble.
All these have an effect on the earth's temperature.
Watch an informed man's video on these factors and you'll begin to get a feel for those changes, all of which are cyclical.

The Sun and Moon are in the Wrong Place ? ( 9:11 )
Published on May 8, 2017

[pas]

Great, not only are we tipping over Guam, we are tipping the earth too. When will we ever learn.

[Flag_This]

"Go to https//SacredGeometryInternational.com There, Randall Carlson as a five part essay on the role of carbon in our atmosphere."

I recently stumbled across his work on YouTube. He has a lot of material there.

[palmer]

CO2 i nthe atmosphere as a direct result of man takes up just 0.00136%

Before fossil fuels: 280 ppm or 0.028% of the atmosphere. After fossil: 400ppm. Man's contribution is 0.012% Your number is about the amount of manmade increase every 5 years.

[palmer]

That’s because CO2 doesn’t keep our planet warm, N2 and O2 do that. The CO2 does capture outgoing IR and transfer it to the N2 and O2. Mars is missing the N2 and O2.

[Yosemitest]

Watch the video, and knock off the sarcasm.
Watch some REAL orbital science, and not that "GLOBAL WARMING CRAP" the the stupid push on us to rob our wallets and our freedoms.

[central_va]

I just expelled some greenhouse gases from my posterior. Does that make me an enemy of the state?

[central_va]

At 180PPM CO₂ plant life begins to die off quickly.

[central_va]

Before fossil fuels:

Ahh. But are CO₂ from natural sources not taken into account? The explosion of Java and Pinatubo did not contribute to the increase

[Flag_This]

"Does that make me an enemy of the state?"

It makes you a likely candidate to be fitted with a government-owned "methane harvester." I've heard they're somewhat uncomfortable to wear.

[stockpirate]

I just ask if they’ve heard of Greenland and how it gots it’s name and that it’s now covered in ice.

[Sacajaweau]

I remember the words of Hillary when this Climate Change cr** started. Gore became the designated hitter.

Hillary said this Climate Cr** was to engage younger future voters and they sure have marketed it to them from the Penguin walk to Green shirts at school.

Gonna write a children's book....Facts and Farts!!

[Sacajaweau]

These same scientists were absolutely stunned that the good bugs ate the oil in the Gulf like a hungry dog after the oil blow out.

Yet these same scientists are the same that recommend "bugging" old gas station sites in cleanup scenarios.

They will simply produce the results the government wants you to see. It's called "Selective Science Method".....aka.....lying your a** off.

[palmer]

No the lowball figure comes from comparing natural biological CO2 sources with manmade sources. In that case the biological sources are about 20 times manmade. But the biosphere is also a sink and, not coincidentally about the same as the bio source. IOW, man's is all source, very little sink, biological is 50 50. The net annual rise therefore is 100% manmade.

Volcanoes are an asterisk. Pinatubo was equal to a day or two of manmade CO2.

[palmer]

Yes, we were in CO2 starvation during the last ice age. The only thing saving the planet is the dryness and ice from the ice age limiting the weathering that reduces atmospheric CO2. Once the plant life dies, CO2 starts to rise with any amount of ocean warming (which releases CO2).

The bottom line is manmade CO2 is unequivocally good.

[central_va]

The net annual rise therefore is 100% manmade.

Horse hockey. This is an opinion and not proven fact.

Besides there is no such thing as man made - the stored hydrocarbons were once biologic creatures, so it is all natural. Unless you believe in abiogenic petroleum which has not been disproven IMO. I consider it a a viable theory.

[bar sin·is·ter]

"retarded dinosaurs"

[bar sin·is·ter]

Something tells me those gassed weren’t green.

[DaveA37]

I thought “climate change” was a dead horse, why keep beating it?