Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nancy Pelosi’s recent statement shows a complete lack of logic
wordpress ^ | March 11, 2017 | Dan from Squirrel Hill

Posted on 03/11/2017 1:49:24 PM PST by grundle

Nancy Pelosi’s recent statement shows a complete lack of logic

We can always count on Nancy Pelosi to provide us with humor and entertainment as she, time and time again, displays proof that she is bat guano insane.

For her latest display, Breitbart reports:

Pelosi: ‘I Would Have Been Gone By Now’ If Hillary Had Won

While speaking with reporters on Friday, House Minority Leader Representative Nancy Pelosi stated of the 2016 presidential election, “I would have been gone by now if she had won.”

Pelosi said that the Affordable Care Act is “a pillar” and that if Clinton was in office, she wouldn’t worry about the ACA going away. Pelosi continued that “we all knew” Clinton would win.

She added that Trump winning “motivated me her to stay.” And “I would have been gone by now if she had won.”

So, here are the facts, according Pelosi:

1) Pelosi “knew” that Hillary Clinton would win the election.

2) If Clinton won the election, Pelosi would no longer stay in the U.S. House of Representatives.

3) Pelosi ran for reelection.

See the contradiction there? If Pelosi “knew” that Clinton would win, and if Clinton winning would mean that Pelosi would no longer be in the House, then why did Pelosi run for reelection in the first place?

If everything that Pelosi had said was true – i.e., if she truly believed that Clinton would win, and if Clinton winning would mean that Pelosi would no longer be a member of the U.S. House – then Pelosi would not have run for reelection.

But she did run for reelection.

Therefore, her statement is completely lacking in logic.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: grundle

Has Mrs Pelosi ever exhibited logic? Like, is this something new?


21 posted on 03/11/2017 2:29:04 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
and that if Clinton was in office
and that if Clinton were in office.

Conditional contrary to fact.

22 posted on 03/11/2017 2:30:28 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic

Did Harry Reid really deny saying that? I don’t recall that he did, though I’d love to see a link.


23 posted on 03/11/2017 2:32:49 PM PST by Maceman (Let's ban Muslims temporarily -- just until non-Muslims can freely practice their religions in Mecca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Logic is something to look for and expect in an educated person of integrity and character. At the very least, logic is something a person would use even in her or his own self interest. Pelosi is not among these. I am hard pressed to find a word to describe her, but I feel confident that even the word “sane” would be inappropriate.


24 posted on 03/11/2017 2:52:39 PM PST by Richard Axtell (The March to the Abyss is speeding up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
SanFranNan has made several confusing statements lately. My opinion is that she is senile. Hillary's loss and Trump's victory have accelerated the aging process. She is well past it.

I am looking forward to many more rambling statements and stupidity from this one. They are going to have to muzzle her soon or risk total ridicule.

25 posted on 03/11/2017 3:05:17 PM PST by Former Proud Canadian (We live in interesting times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
1) Pelosi “knew” that Hillary Clinton would win the election.
2) If Clinton won the election, Pelosi would no longer stay in the U.S. House of Representatives.

The plan, IMO, was to be appointed Sec. of State.
‘Revered Position’ of Secretary of State
Aw, Nancy, was that your price?

26 posted on 03/11/2017 3:17:03 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Botoxed brain


27 posted on 03/11/2017 3:22:28 PM PST by tomd2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

To reason with logic one must have commonsense!


28 posted on 03/11/2017 3:22:55 PM PST by Davy Crocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Silly me...Pelosi: ‘I Would Have Been Gone By Now’ If Hillary Had Won - I thought she was afraid that the Clinton’s would have rubbed her out.


29 posted on 03/11/2017 3:29:26 PM PST by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

C U Next Tuesday!


30 posted on 03/11/2017 3:37:54 PM PST by dancusa ( Trump Wins! Obama's 8 years of a kindergarten class trip is over. The adults are in charge now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: grundle

In other news, somewhere in America a dog bit some guy.


31 posted on 03/11/2017 4:00:29 PM PST by JusPasenThru (SJW is the weaponization of compassion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Nancy Pelosi’s recent statement shows a complete lack of logic

She's not going for a grade in rhetoric, she's trying to win.

32 posted on 03/11/2017 4:02:08 PM PST by Jim Noble (Die Gedanken sind Frei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

all Pelosi’s words are only for preservation of her own personal power. lies, truths it is all the same to her. For her it is power or no power.


33 posted on 03/11/2017 4:07:50 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

“Lack of logic”?

She’s nuts.

She should be at the nut farm.


34 posted on 03/11/2017 4:16:07 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Indeed Harry Reid denied he ever said “this war is lost.”

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rZm8j9sArdg


35 posted on 03/11/2017 4:25:18 PM PST by Organic Panic (Flinging poo is not a valid argument)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gundog

Don Martin depth MAD magazine - that is what she is - she does not believe her own shittw


36 posted on 03/11/2017 5:11:46 PM PST by Jimmy The Snake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

The woman is logically challenged.


37 posted on 03/11/2017 6:07:40 PM PST by Bellflower (Dems = Mat 6:23 ....If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

It is hard to think when you have only semifunctioning mutant cell as your “brain”.


38 posted on 03/11/2017 7:32:34 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson