Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Patriotic State of Jefferson is No CalExit
Canada Free Press ^ | 12/13/16 | Katy Grimes

Posted on 12/13/2016 8:00:44 AM PST by Sean_Anthony

State of Jefferson is a legal, Constitutional and patriotic movement

I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.——Thomas Jefferson

Hundreds of thousands of Northern Californians are seeking a return to a representative government that serves the citizens and not itself.

California’s northern most counties are suffering from a lack of representation in the state Legislature. Northern California holds only 3 out of 80 seats in the California Assembly, 3 out of 40 seats in the California Senate, and 2 out of 53 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. The consequence is devastating and irrefutable: Elected representatives located in the Los Angeles Basin and San Francisco Bay Area make all of the decisions for rural California.


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: blogpimp; calexit; california; canadasucks; clickbait; sallyhemmings; stateofjefferson; thomasjefferson; uva; virginia; yourblogsucks

1 posted on 12/13/2016 8:00:44 AM PST by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Secede! Start your own country. Apportion representatives the way you see fit. It worked for the other 49 (56). Other than that, quit your bitchin’.


2 posted on 12/13/2016 8:03:14 AM PST by Don Corleone (Oil the gun, eat the cannolis, take it to the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

It would help chip away at the electoral juggernaut that is liberal Kalifornication.


3 posted on 12/13/2016 8:19:08 AM PST by GraceG (Only a fool works hard in an environment where hard work is not appreciated...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

I said earlier that Calexit would give Northern Cal an opening to split Cal in two.


4 posted on 12/13/2016 8:20:24 AM PST by joshua c (Cut the cord! Don't pay for the rope they hang you with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

History of the Great State of Jefferson

5 posted on 12/13/2016 8:26:31 AM PST by Rio (Proud resident of the State of Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
The proposed spit and creation of the SoJ would be an excellent solution to an otherwise hopeless situation for the people in the aggrieved counties. Last summer I drove up the central valley and saw “Farmers for Trump” signs everywhere. Rural Californians truly suffer under the tyranny of the masses there.

As noted in the article, this would not be a secession from the Union but merely a split of one state into two, and would be highly beneficial to those of us who value the nation as founded (the 53 percent, so to speak). The apportionments noted would also be at state level, not federal level, which the state could do as it wished. I wish them luck in the endeavor.

6 posted on 12/13/2016 8:28:49 AM PST by wgflyer (Liberalism is to society what HIV is to the immune system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Forming news states is not the answer. In a while, those new states will be over-run with Libs and they will be back in the same situation, except that the Libs would have 2 more Senators and several more Reps.

It is sort of like foreigners coming to America to get away from the hellholes they leave behind. Once here, they spend their lives making the area were they live into the same kind of hellholes they left years earlier.


7 posted on 12/13/2016 8:31:38 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Run over with libs?

Love your glass is half empty attitude. Why don’t we
all just give up if the libs are taking over anyway?

Do you know anyone involved in the State of Jefferson
movement?


8 posted on 12/13/2016 9:14:41 AM PST by Sivad (NorCal red turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Forming new states from existing ones is unconstitutional. You FReepers should know this.


9 posted on 12/13/2016 9:17:42 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Democracy is the backup QB to a dictatorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

It is not an over running of the state by liberals, it is an over running of the cities. The liberals in the rural areas are mostly welfare cases “retiring” to vacation land. Cut off their welfare teat and they will flood back to the cities where they belong.

This is a serious movement, it also includes some of southern Oregon. Maryland was created this way.

I looked at the financial business model for one county, they would be in the black by 12 times the present budget under the current lack of representation. The cities are bleeding the rural counties to death, not counting shutting down logging, mining and claiming all the water.

I am excited about Jefferson, a return to the California of the past before the Liberal takeover.


10 posted on 12/13/2016 9:18:41 AM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Forming new status from old ones is not only constitutional, it has been done before. Us FReepers tend to actually know what we are talking about.


11 posted on 12/13/2016 9:21:03 AM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

It would give the GOP 3 to 4 electoral votes on the Left Coast.

The plus is it would shrink the SF/LA stranglehold on the Electoral College.

Win-Win. And of course if DC was admitted as a city state long with Jefferson it would not upset the political balance of power in Washington.


12 posted on 12/13/2016 9:47:01 AM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joshua c

It should be split into three states and give what is left over to Mexico. Sothern CA goes to Mexico and good riddance.
Central CA is one state, Northern CA is another and the East West corridor from Amador County to the bay area is another and would include the area of San Jose to the north bay and Sacramento. Now that would be paradise. My main concern is that the area of Yosemite would be included in any restructuring with San Francisco and Sacramento.


13 posted on 12/13/2016 10:00:08 AM PST by dirtymac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel

If I had enough money I would move out there...it would be a returning to the the land of my mother in Etna, etc. I loved the whole area as an older child and teen. I do believe there are places where each of us has a spiritual connection and mine is in Northern California. My brother lives in Ukiah with his family. It wouldn’t be too bad to see him and his family once in a while.

I can smell the air right now!! Clean, crisp, full of pine and fir scents.


14 posted on 12/13/2016 11:22:30 AM PST by Bodega (we are developing less and less common sense...world wide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel
Forming new status from old ones is not only constitutional, it has been done before.

That was during extraordinary circumstances, like the Civil War and West Virginia was born.

The Constitution clearly states that no new states may be formed from existing ones.

15 posted on 12/13/2016 4:25:44 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Democracy is the backup QB to a dictatorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
The inland Republican counties have a small population and could be outvoted by the coastal Democrat counties without too much trouble.

Or maybe not. Two populous Republican counties balance out two populous Democrat counties and Southern Oregon is also Republican.

Still, when you look at what fleeing Californians are doing to the rest of the Western states, you can't discount the possibility that they'd do the same thing to "Jefferson."

And would they really call the new state "Jefferson"?

16 posted on 12/13/2016 4:38:23 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson