Efforts Begin To Challenge States Clinton Won

Resistance Feed ^ | 11-25-2016 | Rhett October

[rhett october]

While it appears that Jill Stein has raised enough money, albeit suspiciously, to start a vote recount in Wisconsin, efforts have begun on the other side to challenge votes in three states won by Hillary Clinton: Colorado, Nevada and Virginia.

Operation Sabot 2016, started by the group Oath Keepers is contesting vote totals in Clark County in Nevada; Denver and Boulder Counties in Colorado; and Richmond, Fairfax, and Henrico Counties in Virginia.

[uncbob]

doesn’t matter. once hillary conceded, she lost all right to contest any state that didn’t automatically trigger a recount

She ain't doing it
Stein is

[stockpirate]

Soap box, check.
Ballot box, check.
Ammo box check.....

[castlegreyskull]

No f-ing way she won Nevada.

[FlingWingFlyer]

Just remember, WE are the “well-regulated militia”. Keep your powder dry.

[Mr. K]

brilliant!

[justlurking]

Why not New Hampshire?

Clinton won that by less than 3,000 votes.

[pfflier]

doesn’t matter. once hillary conceded, she lost all right to contest any state that didn’t automatically trigger a recount

Really? What is the legal standing for this statement?

I do agree that stein shouldn't have legal standing but the Wisconsin law says any candidate can request a recount. Perhaps Wisconsin can decide to only count her votes. Their law is silent on how they do the recount:

Wisconsin recount procedures

Any candidate voted for at any election may request a recount. The candidate must file a verified petition with the clerk or body with whom nomination papers are to be filed for that office. The petition should be filed not earlier than the time of completion of the canvass and not later than 5:00 p.m. on the third business day following the determination of the results of the election.[1] The petition must specify each ward or municipality in which a recount is desired. An opposing candidate or any voter or other interested party may similarly file a petition for a recount in any or all of the remaining wards or municipalities.[2]

If the difference between the votes cast for the leading candidate and those cast for the petitioner is not more than 0.5% of the total votes if more than 1,000 votes are cast, the petitioner is not required to pay a fee. Otherwise, the petitioner must pay the calculated or estimated fee at the time of filing.[3]

[freeandfreezing]

Don’t forget New Hampshire.

A very interesting research project for New Hampshire FReepers would be to get a copy of the check in records for your town. (They are probably a public record, like voter registrations)

See who voted absentee - since that is marked on the checklist.

Carefully, without annoying or bothering anyone, check to see if the individuals who voted absentee really are NH residents, or people who moved out of state but still voted here.

Share your results.

[Rebel2016]

Remember, it’s illegal for a green card holder to vote, it has to be a citizen. Let’s say how many Somalian green card holders voted.

[Duchess47]

Well the Oath Keepers are not political and I believe they were monitoring voting here in several places in the west.

[bjcoop]

New Hampshire, Nevada, and Minnesota deserve challenges. Who knows what fraud was committed in Minneapolis or in Clarke County, NV

[Karl Spooner]

[hanamizu]

The House of Representatives has to vote to accept the electoral college votes from each state. If, in fact, it looks like an attempt to steal the election is underway, the House can (and hopefully will) refuse to accept the “new” results. This happened once before in the Hays-Tilden election.

[butlerweave]

Will Stein have to prove hacking before there’s a recount and how can a recount prove hacking ,it’s just a way to hack and add thousands fake Hillary votes

[MayflowerMadam]

I think Gore conceded to Bush 43 via phone, and then “took it back” so there could be a recount.

[PA Engineer]

it is so sad Soros and Obama and DNC and Company have so discredited our election system. We need to get rid of the basturds who forced so many states to not even ID voters.

This is at the core of what’s made our elections untrustworthy. But of course 99 percent or more of the fradulent votes are still being cast for D’s in a handful of the major cities. Las Vegas has been notorious as an illegal alien voting station....and ballot box stuffing site...for many, many years. It will be interesting to see if there’s any way of getting the Vegas vote count trued. (Can it be trued, or have the D’s machine so thoroughly stuffed it full of illegal and fake ballots that its beyond repair? I really don’t know...)

Guess who is behind the recount? 100% Soros.

EXPERTS WHO CALLED FOR RECOUNT IN THREE STATES INCLUDES VOTING RIGHTS-ATTORNEY THAT HAPPENED TO HELP GEORGE SOROS LAUNCH THE NATIONAL VOTING RIGHTS INSTITUTE IN 1994

[b4me]

sounds good. Just not wanting to stir up more confusion or troubles.

Seems PA is passed the date to ask the election commission for a challenge/recount. so It seems to me that no current lawful way for Trump to fall below 270. Just have to get through the EC Vote on Dec 19, then on to Jan 20 :)

[bjcoop]

There will have to be a challenge to result now in PA (since recount deadline passed) for there to be a recount. I don’t see how there would be cause to grant one.

[bjcoop]

We need to fight fire with fire. It’s time to challenge Nevada, New Hampshire, and Minnesota.

[Salamander]

I hope so.

I thought I was done worrying for a while.

:(