Posted on 08/03/2016 5:25:18 AM PDT by marktwain
The whole thing will be thrown out. But with an official complaint, doesn’t Dr. Dre have the right to know the name of his accuser?
If he deems this an “arrest” he could also be sued for false arrest.
FOIA the 9-1-1 call. etc. etc. ...
It’s not uncommon for someone to be handcuffed after a report of a gun, he wasn’t arrested.
He was being detained. I don’t blame the cops. They are responding to a call about a gun. It’s hard to reach for a gun when your handcuffed.
Now, if the citizen that made the arrest filed a false arrest claim then I’m sure Dr. Dre can sue his butt off.
Yes I was unclear about the suit subject, it would indeed be the individual making the citizens arrest, not the coppers.
would appear to be manufactured news per the article.
If you are the police it is dammed if you do and dammed if you don’t
Nope, AA billionaires dont be breakin’ no laws ..
What I note here (and I am NOT a Dr. Dre fan - whoever he is) is that a rich and clearly INTELLIGENT black man cooperated, was not shot, and was released.
Now he is back to whatever it is he does all day long, rather than involved with this stupidity
Being fettered and denied your freedom and liberty sure sounds like an arrest. He may not have been hauled in, booked ans charged but his liberty surely was halted.
If they handcuff you and detain you, you ARE under arrest, even if they let you go later.
Hell, I was handcuffed for a traffic accident.
“It’s not uncommon for someone to be handcuffed after a report of a gun, he wasn’t arrested.”
If you’re in handcuffs you are arrested, as in not free to go about your business.
Though not applicable in this case, gangs sometimes use a street technique of a gun caddy who is underage, who keeps and provides an illegal gun when needed.
If the caddy is arrested, he tells the police that he found the gun, gets some time in the juvenile justice system, then is handsomely compensated. But if an adult gang member needs the gun, it is right there and available on demand. After use, it is returned to the caddy.
In some circumstances, guns have been used in several shootings, by different adults in different places, giving the others good alibis if they are arrested or searched.
Again, this doesn’t fit this particular situation. But Dre should know better, and sent an employee to drive off the pest, instead of placing himself at risk.
Where the heck is his HEAD?
WHY?
The article mentions that Dre said the accuser and he had been involved in a “road rage” incident before this, and that’s why (it’s implied) the man parked there in the way of Dre’s driveway. Perhaps he thought the cell phone pointed at him was a gun, or perhaps there was a gun brandished during the road rage incident. Either way, that was some silliness involved, and Dre did well to be calm and cooperative, lest he be arrested and investigated for the road rage incident. Sure, he might get released after police “clear it up,” but he could be beaten or killed while in custody (by other arrestees) awaiting his release, etc., plus, why go through that nonsense? I don’t personally like the handcuff part, but that comes down to officer discretion and departmental policy, so I hope the officer was reasonable and followed policy. That policy can always be challenged and changed.
I thought he was simply leaning into the wall on the other side of that post with the black rectangle sticking out (? light fixture ?). Look at the others in the picture closer to the viewer and see the pattern—they stick out from the wall enough for a head to lean in past the top of the post.
Me too, and it was bullshit without probable cause.
WHY?...Cop was a Muslim?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.