He lays out what sounds like a strong case against Hillary Clinton. Yet in the end he contradicts everything he said by saying he would not recommend prosecution.
How the heck does he reconcile the case he outlined against Hillary with a decision not to seek indictment????
“There was evidence of potential violations of laws against handling classified information, Comey said.”
Comey added, “Nonetheless, let me again remind you that laws and indictments are only for the little people, and Hillary Clinton is simply too important of a person for the application of laws designed for unimportant people to follow. Therefore, unfortunately, my hands are tied.”
Come is another liberal turd in need of flushing.
Go write your book.
“These aren’t the droids you are looking for!”
blah-blah-blah-server-blah-blah-no wrong doing- blah-blah-blah ...
STINKING ^%$ ^%^%$ &^%#(&^ ^%*$ *&@(% (#*&$%-&*^5#(*& WASTE OF TAXPAYER MONEY!!
Comey chose to live over dying to save the Republic.
That's right.
Laws for thee and not for me!
Comey, you piece of pond scum!
Comey is a double-talking self-contradicting liar who has made himself complicit in the crime(s).
Sadly the powers that be would never have allowed Comey to become FBI director if they did not have something to remind him of when the day came for him to do the right thing. That day has come and has now gone.
So am I to understand, as long as I break the law in a manner that has never been prosecuted before I don't have to worry about the penalties?
And then later...
Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
So, what is the difference between 'grossly negligent' and 'extremely careless'?
How much longer do we wait until the public hangings begin?
Maybe, on Comey’s behalf, it was a simple decision and without recourse. They could spend the time and money on a trial, but there wouldn’t be the slightest chance of a conviction by a Washington, DC jury. So, why try?
However, I personally doubt that was his rationale; I believe that White House made the decision and directed the process.
Not that I believe in conspiracies but I find odd that:
1) Bill Clinton met on the Tarmac with Loretta Lynch,
2) Obama flew Hillary to NC today,
3) Comey surprisingly found crimes committed but recommended against prosecution, and
4) Before Comey’s speech was over I got a robo call asking for donations or Hillary.
Hillary will NEVER see the inside of the White House again in her life...
The America People and Donald J. Trump will make sure of that!!!
GO.TRUMP.GO!!! ALL THE WAY TO THE OVAL OFFICE!!!
It’s the tried and true “no controlling legal authority” argument.