[Dilbert San Diego]

He lays out what sounds like a strong case against Hillary Clinton. Yet in the end he contradicts everything he said by saying he would not recommend prosecution.

How the heck does he reconcile the case he outlined against Hillary with a decision not to seek indictment????

[DarthVader]

He is using double speak to provide some HA explanation for this abomination! He is on the list now.

[Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America]

Hillary’s willful misconduct and gross negligence was cause for indictment. Comey is a sell-out. FUJC.

[Cboldt]

-- How the heck does he reconcile the case he outlined against Hillary with a decision not to seek indictment? --

As a legal technicality, on the basis that the evidence doesn't clearly meet the elements of 18 USC 793.

But he is duplicitous. He knows the facts make an easy 18 USC 1924(a) case.

He knows the talking heads will follow his 793 bait, which leads to a stalemate (in argument) at best, and could well result in agreement that Hillary's conduct doesn't meet 793.

[The_Media_never_lie]

How the heck does he reconcile the case he outlined against Hillary with a decision not to seek indictment????

Easy.

Hillary is queen. The head of the nation's security does not indict the queen.

[kiryandil]

How the heck does he reconcile the case he outlined against Hillary with a decision not to seek indictment????

He laid back and thought of his pension as Hillary was ramming it home behind him...