Posted on 06/07/2016 11:22:35 AM PDT by DarthVader
Donald Trump got in a lot of trouble for criticizing the Mexican heritage of the judge that is presiding over the Trump University case.
It obviously wasn’t his best moment but the media is overlooking the connection between this judge and La Raza which is a radical leftist group that basically doesn’t believe in borders and violently attacks anyone that disagrees with them.
That is a huge factor in determining whether or not this judge can be fair in the case.
That’s exactly what we saw from them in San Jose over the weekend.
(Excerpt) Read more at youngcons.com ...
Check this out too and see who is involved from the Plaintiff side of the case:
http://www.libertynewsnow.com/who-is-paying-to-prosecute-trump-university-civil-claim/article4599
When you start putting the pieces together it looks like a pre-planned scheme with hand picked players.
The similarity of names consists of the term "La Raza", which I am told means, "the race". Not "race". Not "races". Not "a race". But, "THE race".
Now one might ask, "When they say, THE race, which one are they talking about? Caucasians? Negro? Mongoloid?
The answer is, "None of the above". Instead they have invented a new "race" based on a philosophy of entitlement.
Where do we hear mention of "THE race"?
"Por La Raza todo, Fuera de La Raza nada", which is often translated as "For the Race, everything, outside the race, nothing."
I claim that the "similarity" of names is intentional, and the intention is to support the philosophy of entitlement which seeks to negate U.S. immigration laws and the sovereignty of the U.S. in the southwestern states.
If somebody started an organization called "The Alabama Klan", I would have doubts about them too. The same would apply to "The Alabama Klan Lawyers Association".
I read this earlier too. The blogosphere is on to this.
Then why was it resealed?
La Raza is “the Klan with a Tan”
Yes, Trump talked about the La Raza connection in Sunday. Better than that, he made the connection between the judge being proud of his Mexican heritage and Trump building a wall between Mexico and the US. It was done well.
There are five - see the left wrist below the right boot.
The point that is being grasped for is that the Judge is connected to the non-defensible, racist, organization that gave lots of money to Bill Clinton for “speeches,” for Hillary’s campaign, and other vague causes.
What’s that brown stuff on their fingers?.
“La Raza” means “The Race.”
Imagine a bunch of white guys forming a group called, “The Race,” and then having their group advance issues on behalf of whites, and then give scholarships only to whites.
Now imagine them having tax-free status and their OBVIOUS racially-prejudiced origins and purpose being ignored or glossed over by the media and press.
Yeah, I know, something like that can only exist while one’s eyelids are closed.
The simple fact is that this “judge” associates with a racially-biased group, which shares some common directors with the main, VERY racist, La Raza national organization. This guy does not have the proper demeanor to be a judge, let alone one presiding in a case brought against Donald Trump.
That would open the floodgates for all litigants to find something not to like and start shopping around for a new judge every time there is an unfavorable ruling for one side or the other. As I understand it, recusal needs to be a specific conflict of interest like family members involved in litigation or money changing hands, etc. a party can’t manufacture bias through new conduct after the judge has been assigned.
Exactly. See posts #29 and #41. You will start to connect the dots which confirm the suspicions.
grasped = groped
>>Writers need to get to the point before the link / page break.
That was “old journalism” back when people already bought the paper before they read it.
This is “nu jernelizzim” where every story is click bait so the lead goes to the end forcing the reader to change the screen 3-20 times to see the reason for the story.
Bombshell or not, anyone in a few minutes can find this judge’s bio online, and it is immediately apparent that his entire legal/professional life has revolved around race/identity politics.
28 U.S. Code § 455 – Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge
(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
(b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances:
(1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding;
(2) Where in private practice he served as lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom he previously practiced law served during such association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judge or such lawyer has been a material witness concerning it;
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/455
//
Code of Conduct for United States Judges
Canon 2: A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in all Activities
(A) Respect for Law. A judge should respect and comply with the law and should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.
(B) Outside Influence. A judge should not allow family, social, political, financial, or other relationships to influence judicial conduct or judgment. A judge should neither lend the prestige of the judicial office to advance the private interests of the judge or others nor convey or permit others to convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence the judge. A judge should not testify voluntarily as a character witness.
(C) Nondiscriminatory Membership. A judge should not hold membership in any organization that practices invidious discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion, or national origin.
http://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/code-conduct-united-states-judges
Egads! I hate click-bait.
You just rested Darth Vader’s case!
Another good one Ray. The key word here is “to avoid even the appearance of impropriety” which at the very minimum is being violated here.
The problem now is what should trump do next? His Trump U case is a big distraction for voters who think he just cannot take personal criticism. He should go on to attack Hillary who is getting away scot free of her criminal behavior and there is plenty of fresh meat there for Trump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.