Article and comments.
Thanks, Art in Idaho.
Posted on 05/04/2016 10:26:51 PM PDT by Art in Idaho
Indictment.
That is the term heard increasingly from sources adjacent to the ongoing investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email scandal that apparently now places her at considerable risk of facing a very serious federal espionage charge.
The risk was great enough to require President Obama to come out publicly to warn off the investigation when during an interview he attempted downplay Mrs. Clinton’s “confusion” over federal classified information laws.
It was the very same tactic the president used to diminish the earlier IRS scandal and he now appears hopeful he can be just as successful in minimizing the damage to Hillary Clinton and thus, himself.
Rumors are now swirling that the FBI already has enough to implicate Mrs. Clinton in directly jeopardizing national security. What remains to be known is if that jeopardy was willful or merely negligent.
Both are capable of generating a recommendation from the FBI to the Justice Department that formal charges be brought against the former Obama Secretary of State and there has been a more recent flurry of speculation that such charges could be forthcoming within the next month or two.
That risk is said to be a primary motivating factor behind Bernie Sander’s determination to stay in the race all the way to the Democrat convention this summer. And now with the Republican primary race having been conceded to Donald Trump, media focus will shift, at least in part, to the ongoing FBI investigation against Hillary Clinton.
If FBI Director James Comey’s intent was to finalize the investigation after the primary election cycle had somewhat diminished, this would the time to do just that, and such timing now towers over the lame-duck presidency of Barack Obama and the scandal-plagued political aspirations of Hillary Clinton.
I have posted multiple times 2 huge and overlooked election issues
The “quote” brokered convention all barked about was a ruse, sorta, Trump won and it has been known for 4 months he was gonna win
Nope,that brokered convention is for the dems
Hillary will not be the nominee,so who is Trump actually runnin against ,really?
Please check the above links plus our revered Nachum:
http://nachumlist.com/emailgate.htm
Please check posts by Nachum, Liz and others. We can do this!
Yes, more and more the story is getting out. A lot of it has been known since March, 2015, but hey, better late than never. We are at War with the left and Hillary. Fight On!
I hope Trump's people are reviewing all the info on Free Republic. If any of you have any connections with them, please send this info to them.
If her hard drive was transferred to the cloud”””
Go to thread number 3427056 here on FR. Seems Shrillary paid a company in Sparks, Nevada to destroy records.
www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3427056/posts
That way Obama cannot pardon her”””
*I am not so sure. I think Obama can pardon her for ‘anything she may have done’.
I believe that company in Colorado stored backups in the cloud, although HRC may not have realized it, so destroying hard drives wouldn't matter. Plus, I believe the hard drive destructions happened fairly recently.
I'm betting the FBI has all those deleted emails. IT people tell me that believing anything is really deleted these days is folly.
FBI interviews Clinton aides including Huma Abedin as part of email probe Hillary date in the coming weeks. Will her attorneys let her speak?
As for polls, some have Trump neck and neck with Hillary, some slightly behind.
Reagan started 20 pts behind Carter.
Bush Sr. was 10 pts behind Dukais.
Article and comments.
Thanks, Art in Idaho.
B T T T
Solyndra is owned mostly by the company Os great grandfather worked for. The one whose money started the family trust that O still has income from. (Check his schedule E)
I thought the FBI granted immunity in exchange for their interviews with him. He's pleading the 5th to congressional interviews. (I thought the FBI got what they were after.)
for later
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer - Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
2. having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer - Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
Obama knew she didn't have a state.gov email address. He's complicit too. Six year statute of limitations.
I think the section you posted agrees with me...?
This is the famous 18 USC section salient to HRCs’ email activities.
The awesome responsibility of simply possessing these items in any form whatsoever....As I said, it isn’t a “deliberate” or “by accident” duality.
Granting of access to these materials (eg; a “security clearance”) carries the explicit acceptance of the complete responsibility of either shepherding it/them in the prescribed fashion of using strictly government servers; or, immediately reporting any security breach that the security clearance itself provides for.
So HRC’s whole “I didn’t know” line of reasoning is impossible in its very utterance, in any variation. It’s not possible for her to not know. If she knows enough to NOT use (and never sign up for or on to) the gov’t server then she must be aware that breaching the gov’t <> private barrier is the offense. This is the mens rea alone and by itself, without any reference to any external act or consequence. There is no plausible reason to avoid the gov’t server other than to keep her affairs off it/them. That she (or the Clinton foundation) paid for her server and the IT setup of same and remotely located it all only bolsters the case that she worked to hide her affairs.
So then, if she receives her official email on her private server, that is the same type of illegal security breach proscribed in the law. Just receiving it. Just receiving it without knowing or not knowing whether it was deemed “classified”. If you received it...then realized it was classified...then where is the report that secrecy laws were breached? She never made any such report, as far as I know, though it would not surprise me that the report of a classified security breach is itself classified the instant it is generated and thus we would not know about it.
But AFAIK, she has not stated to date anything at all suggesting she made a “breach” report...as is her absolute responsibility...and the failure to so report is exactly the same offense as offering it up for sale or leaving on the seat of a taxi by accident. No, she has made excuse after excuse how an innocent grandmother shouldn’t have to cope with these kinds of trivialities.
That's right. If the facts are as reported, she's lead pipe cinch guilty as sin and I'm the prosecutor's worst nightmare when I'm on a jury.
pinging
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.