Posted on 04/26/2016 5:16:30 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Nate Silver was a once respected pollster. His polls were accurate a lot of the time, though they always had a left wing bias. Now, Silver has completely lost it, predicting a Mark Zuckerberg-David Petraeus ticket. Not only does Silver predict such a ridiculous idea as a presidential ticket, he also claims that Zuckerberg-Petaeus would win 428 Electoral College votes.
(GRPHIC-AT-LINK)
Earth to Nate Silver, Mark Zuckerberg isnt even 35 years old yet and therefore not eligible to be President of the United States. What dope Nate Silver is smoking, Id like to get my hands on some. This guy has completely lost it and any respect he once had as a pollster.
So Zuckerberg is not 35 years old, I thought Article II, I, 5 did not matter any more.
The average fan can more accurately predict sports outcomes without all his "fancy" big data analytics tools.
Memo to 2nd Div Vet....might just as well get down to Triple A and get your trip ticket. A long bus ride should do you well. And please, leave your laptop home.
WTF are you talking about?
Not this year he does not. He waits until final moments and then makes his predictions. He’s wrong about Trump all year long sucking the liberal kool aid.
I got Trump winning 109 to 112 tonight.
Right here with comments.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3424709/posts?page=451#451
Agree about the sports predictions.
Analysis of polls is different.
Could it have been an exercise in SARCASM?
I am still writing Trump in.
You don’t like him because he’s (grudgingly) predicting a Trump nomination.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.