Posted on 03/27/2016 6:42:57 AM PDT by justlittleoleme
(Excerpt) Read more at befuddledbytheclowns.blogspot.com ...
In Clinton’s case, there was evidence that was known and reported from day one: Linda Tripp had recorded conversations with Monica Lewinsky discussing the affair in lurid detail. Monica had preserved a dress with Clinton’s DNA on it. Monica Lewinsky was a White House intern who was known to have contact with and spent time with Clinton. Those are facts that were known from the earliest stages of the scandal. See, the original Drudge story here: http://www.drudgereportarchives.com/data/2002/01/17/20020117_175502_ml.htm Note the specific facts and the taped conversations, Monica’s bragging, her transfer to the Pentagon. What do you know about any of Cruz’s supposed mistresses or about the supposed affairs?
There are no facts being reported about Cruz. NONE.
Your Welcome
A long article containing zero evidence that Pierson planted the story and Pierson’s subsequent denial of the affair strongly suggsts that she did not. That said, Trump should probably be careful with Ms. Pierson.
Of course a lawyer would leave a paper trail of anything he does. It is his job to make sure it does not happen. Problem with the $500K it is sitting out there in the open.
There is plenty of proof that Rubio has been pushing this story for months, but that destroys your talking points to deflect the scandal as an evil Trump trick.
Nice try and just for your edification, campaigns coordinate with PACs all the time. Your boyhood innocence is truly adorable.
Points well taken. My point however, is that in spite of all of the damning evidence against him, Clinton still wagged his finger in our faces and denied the affair...and did so until the DNA showed up.
Raphael has yet to deny..he only blames others for releasing the story..
He absolutely did deny the story. Reported here and everywhere:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/25/ted-cruz-calls-national-enquirer-story-garbage-com/
In this sense he reminds me of Clinton... both were attracted to very immature women outside their marriage.
He absolutely did deny the story. Reported here and everywhere:
Thanks. Read that he called the reports “garbage”, but did not read that they were “lies”...until now.
We shall see..
there’s nothing concrete right now... that is true. Are you at all disconcerted by his relationship with Amanda? Just on the basis of what she posted on social media. Do you think its a bit immature that Ted also played along, and gave her a shout out by showing the temp tattoo he also got on Fox news? I also found it very strange that the fox news people asked him why he wasn’t wearing a jacket. Either he or Amanda prepped them to ask that. Then she posts a foto on social media wearing a mens suit jacket? So creepy and immature... whatever their relationship was.
How do you know she is the source of the sex scandal story? Just asserting that does not make it true. And what has she said about either Ted or Heidi that is not true?
“There are no facts being reported about Cruz. NONE.”....
...YET.....
Fixed it. We’ll see. The NE is in the process of building up suspense. THAT’S what sells papers. If there’s no “there- there” at the end, its the end for NE.
I’m betting the “There-there” is coming AFTER they set up sCruz’s denials and false counter charges....But I’m willing to wait to see if what I suspect is true....you should too in re NE lack of hard evidence at this juncture.....
” I never had sexual relations with that woman....miss Lewinski...”
We haven’t even reached that point.....
....YET.....
So what in spill the bean is not true?
Carly took Cruz to the cleaners, she's lived her life in the real world playing hardball at the highest level. Cruz didn't stand a chance. Wait till trump gets an opportunity to play hardball.
Don’t forget the victim card, St Cruz is always the victim.
I only recently started using twiter but could that 5:22 AM time be from a different time zone? Are the Twitter servers serving the DC area on the east coast?
Cruz is a lawyer. He is an expert at making denials that do not really deny anything. In another thread I parsed Cruz's denial about this stuff on facebook. He didn't deny anything, he just kept referring to Trump over and over. Trump has made no allegations about Ted Cruz's adultery. Any time Cruz “denies” something and then ties Trump to it in the same sentence... he is not denying allegations of adultery. The sentence I quoted in my first paragraph is a perfect example. He is denying some nonspecific “smear” from Donald Trump. It is not a denial of his extramarital activities. Do we really want another lying adulterer in the White house?
When Cruz comes out and says he has never cheated on his wife then I will take him more seriously.
She clearly has a crush on him and she is a seriously good looking babe, so maybe. But don't forget about that 500k to Carly, there was a reason for that and reasons offered thus far are very weak.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.