Click The Pic
Thanks for eliminating another candidate from my further consideration!
“I think frankly, our churches should not be forced to do anything that’s not consistent with them. But if you’re a cupcake maker and somebody wants a cupcake, make them a cupcake, Let’s not have a big lawsuit or argument over all this stuff, move on. The next thing, you know, they might be saying, if you’re divorced you shouldn’t get a cupcake.”
Say good bye Gov. Get off the stage. And if you want a Muslim cab driver to bring you a bottle of scotch from the liquor store, get your walking shoes on. Moron.
No shoes, no shirt, no service
Kasich autocorrect? “Mask have.” Demonstrated to be a moron.
Don’t places still have the sign: “We reserve the right to refuse service to customers”??
http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/22/politics/john-kasich-increased-media-attention/ The quote is on CNN. I assume the big government liberal really said this.
Personally, I would have baked the cake for the perverts. I would have done a good job if they hired me. And I would have charged them triple to make up for dealing with something I found disgusting (I used to charge democrats triple, when I was willing to consult for them at all). That is my personal choice because, to me, baking a cake does not constitute participating in their parody of a sacred sacrament.
However, Kasich is fatally wrong on this question. It’s not about what I would choose to do or what he would choose to do. This is about our God-given individual right to the free exercise of our religion - 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, in all areas of our lives. By arguing against protecting the God-given rights enshrined in the Constitution, Kasich is proving that my previous conclusion about him was right, as was my reasoning. Kasich does not value either the literal words of the Constitution or the idea of natural rights.
So to Kasich if you want to own a business you must be willing to forego your religious convictions. As I recall the bakery owners didn’t refuse to sell a simple cake they refused to decorate that cake to glorify homosexuality. That is a big difference.
If a black guy goes into a restaurant and orders a cup of coffee and a doughnut and the restaurant owner refuses to serve the guy because of his “religious convictions”, that’s against the law in every state.
How is this different?
This is why, if you value your religious and other freedoms, you don’t vote for “compassionate conservatism” RINOs like Kasich. You vote for Cruz.
Trump kaisich both tell Christians do your jobs!
Kasich is one dumb cookie. President of the High School Student Council is about his upper limit.
A $135,000 fine certainly violates the prohibition against excessive fines in the Constitution.
Kasich SUICIDE watch ping!
There’s no way in hell I’d ever vote for a ticket with Kasich on it, whether as prez or veep. And it’s things like this that have long since solidified that position for me.
I still recall his early debate performance where he’s giving himself a self-congratulatory pat on the back for attending a homo wedding ceremony. I don’t think I have the words to fully express how thoroughly repellent I find Kasich, along with any other GOP slugs that cowtow and prostrate themselves before the homo-fascists.
Faith - belief in something not verifiable scientifically
Religion - How one lives one’s life and how one relates to other people because of one’s spiritual beliefs
A key to religion is the shunning of those who do not believe or observe the tenets.
A Christian foundry owner has the right not to make a golden calf.
But to him if a mussie doesn’t want to do something well that’d be okay. Like.
The 2015 gay marriage ruling completes a rewrite of our Constitution. The First Amendment says and used to mean, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press". In contrast the ruling on gay marriage helps illustrates how far the country has departed from first principles.
We are familiar with the term "speech or expression", which seems an innocuous expansion of the above amendment. However, "expression" enables a nearly unbounded multi-billion dollar pornography industry.
Justice Kennedy's majority opinion states,"The First Amendment ensures that religious organizations and persons are given proper protection as they seek to advocate and teach the principles that are so fulfilling and central to their lives and faith". Such language severely restricts religious freedom by happening to exclude "free exercise thereof". This oversight means one cannot exercise religious beliefs in business and personal lives even though the Constitution makes no distinction between individuals, organizations and churches.
Now we have a country in which a woman can choose to express herself in the adult film industry, but cannot own a bakery and choose to exercise her religious convictions by refusing to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple.
The Formal End to Judeo-Christian America
http://townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/2015/06/30/the-formal-end-to-judeochristian-america-n2018986/page/full
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES GAY MARRIAGE
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf
Bar the doors?
http://www.worldmag.com/2015/10/bar_the_doors
6/27/15 Wayne Cordeiro
https://www.facebook.com/pastorwaynecordeiro?fref=nf•;
I’d vote for Yeb! before I’d vote for this sanctimonious twit.