Posted on 10/24/2015 8:02:41 AM PDT by RaceBannon
I haven't done a quick vanity screed in ages, not as a singluar post, but something set me off today.
Donald Trump claims now that he will close some mosques in the United States if they are ISIL related.
"Varney asked Trump if he agreed with British Prime Minister David Cameron’s recent proposal to close mosques if a worshiper is linked to ISIS. Trump responded unequivocally, “Absolutely, I think it’s great.” Varney, apparently taken aback by Trump’s flippant response to depriving Americans of their constitutional rights, followed up incredulously, “Can you close a mosque?” Adding, “We do have religious freedom.” Trump then gave us this gem: “It depends. If the mosque is, you know, loaded for bear.” “Loaded for bear”?! Is that a term I missed in law school about when it’s OK to violate Americans’ constitutional rights?? from: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/10/22/now-trump-says-i-ll-close-mosques.html
http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/04/us/garland-mohammed-drawing-contest-shooting/
The attack happened in early May, 2015. Trump started his campaign for POTUS in mid June, 2015. While running, he's not PC. ; )
Perry should never be anywhere near the WH. I was all for him when he ran years ago until I researched him and he was a fake. From some things I have read about Walker, he is no better. Baloney to your last remarks. How can anyone say that?
I missed that one, I forgot!
we need a new thread alone just for that!!
What does that make the other candidates?
You are, of course, completely correct.
Where do you find that in the Constitution?
bogus
The issue, once the gun came out, was NO LONGER the cartoon
It was the POINT PAM WAS MAKING
That ISLAM wants to kill people who they claim, on whatever pretense, insults their prophet
and that FREEDOM OF SPEECH is paramount in a free society
apparently, you are too brainwashed to understand this, also
So is Trump
If NOTHING happened, his comment would be just that, a comment. BUT, that is NOT what happened, was it?
TWO jihadists with machine guns tried to slaughter 150 Americans over a cartoon!
and you are outraged over pencil and paper?
That is what makes you angrier??
Go hide in the corner, you coward. If you cant see the difference, you are not worthy of protection. The women will protect you from harm.
It’s not treason if the perp is not an American.
The proper term is “illegal enemy combatant”. Non-uniformed illegal combatants such as spies and saboteurs may be shot on sight.
Any mosque that provides training, inspiration, motivation, aid and comfort to such has forfeited its rights to be considered a peaceful religious organization, and any protections to which such an organization is entitled.
Too boring to attract the attention of cretins.
Try decaf.
Trump didn’t try to silence Pam. He pointed out that if muslims are nuts then why provoke them. He never said they weren’t nuts.
It's inappropriate that such words or any insult should lead to violence.
And it's incumbent on all of us to say that.
everyone has their faults, I like Cruz because he has the least.
The TPP bill I think it was? He was expecting some transparency on it? He explained it on Levin...it never developed
while it was a huge blunder...what else did he mess up?
Almost all the other guys are much worse...much, much worse
You listened to Dem propaganda on Walker - he has made a great governor whatever ‘research’ you may have done on Walker was greatly flawed.
I can say what I see, just as I called both Obama and Clinton when they first appeared. Only Reagan fooled me - into thinking he was a friend of commercial fisherman which I was at the time - an industry he nearly single handedly destroyed.
“Eric Bolling asked Trump if he would uphold the Constitution over Sharia law. His response? It isn’t his argument and he doesn’t want to get into it.”
Trump knows a childish argument when he hears it. You don’t like Trump, but who cares.
You parrot the media line on Walker. Hillary is not anyone I care for now nor when she was in the WH last time.
and he never said that using a machine gun to murder 150 people was worse than drawing a cartoon, either, and if you cant understand that, you are unfit for public appearance at dog shows, let alone the Presidency.
Next time, try thinking through your false analogy about coffee. I didnt have any.
I’m sure you’ll be pleased with yourself after voting for Hillary, but you make a liar of yourself by proclaiming Trump questioning the logical sense of provoking someone you know to be nuts as the same as supporting the nuts.
I mean, you claim because Trump questioned Pam’s motives means he supports islam and therefore wanting to close their temples is against what he said of Pam.
You make about as much sense as man that cuts off his genitals calling himself a woman.
At least in this screed, it’s only a few words at a time and not complete sentences...like I have done before... :)
“and he never said that using a machine gun to murder 150 people was worse than drawing a cartoon”
So, you think Trump must say what you expect him to say or else you will conclude things about him he never said??
I don’t know what makes you so stupid, but it really works.
First, try writing like an adult, and second, try decaf.
Where did Trump blame her? I don’t see it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.