Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I Like 9mm
AShooting Journal ^ | 6/18/2015 | John Johnston

Posted on 06/18/2015 10:31:19 AM PDT by w1n1

When I used to work at a gun store I was frequently asked what caliber was best for any given situation. It would have been nice if there had been some sort of magic death ray that I could have suggested, but there isn’t, and most people have a pretty flawed understanding of what actually happens when a bullet interacts with a human target. Here’s my take on it and personal reasoning behind selecting a 9mm round.

For starters let’s examine a couple of concepts that don’t actually exist in the scientific world but everyone talks about anyway. I’m going to regurgitate the work from those better than myself, and the information is worth paying attention to.

KNOCKDOWN POWER

This doesn’t actually exist. If a bullet had enough force to knock down an individual, it would also knock down the individual firing the gun. People do not go flying through the air when hit by a bullet, contrary to what the movies and television would have us believe. Newton’s Third Law and all.

ENERGY DUMP

On the back of a box of ammo, manufacturers list the foot-pounds of energy (ft-lbf, or foot-pounds of force/energy) that their rounds have. Well, that doesn’t actually matter. The terminal performance of a projectile is determined solely by how much tissue it cuts, crushes or tears. While it has been advocated by many-a-misinformed-gun-counter commando that some sort of energy transfer occurs between a projectile and its target, this has been rejected by everyone I respect who studies terminal ballistics for a living.

9mm is for girls and sissies How often have you heard, “If you’re not carrying a caliber that begins with the number four and ends with the number five, you’re doing it wrong”? This almost makes sense if we were limited to nonexpanding ammunition, but most of us aren’t. When we compare modern hollow-point rounds in popular service calibers, there is, on average, one-tenth of an inch of difference in expanded diameter between a 9mm and a .45ACP. Grab a ruler and look at a tenth of an inch. It doesn’t seem like much, does it? That’s because it’s not. Read the rest of the story here.


TOPICS: Education; Hobbies; Military/Veterans; Outdoors
KEYWORDS: banglist; guns; handguns; pistols
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: mabarker1
Either will do the job IF placed properly.

As a buddy says, "Shot placement is King, adequate penetration is Queen, and everything else is angels dancing on the head of a pin."

41 posted on 06/18/2015 11:38:08 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean; All
.

 photo CALIBER WAR2_zpshaurnfvi.jpg

.

 photo 9v45 Poster_zpsq64sfdfu.jpg

42 posted on 06/18/2015 11:39:00 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

If I pull the trigger and it goes boom, I like it.

My affinities when shooting align to the gun itself more than the round. Some guns just seem to fit/handle better than others. I suspect a persons confidence in a gun plays a part as well. As I’ve gotten older, I find the sites on the gun have a bearing on whether I like to shoot it or not.

The 9mm is a good round. Ample and cheap ammo.


43 posted on 06/18/2015 11:39:48 AM PDT by IamConservative (There is no greater threat to our freedoms than Bipartisanship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Right.

I recently saw where that door gunner was chosen for the role of Sgt. Hartman until Lee Ermey showed up and stole the show.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRkyKYz5SYM


44 posted on 06/18/2015 11:48:19 AM PDT by USMCPOP (Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative

For pistols I shoot 9mm, .40., .45 .38spl and .357 - doesn’t matter to me. I like shooting and I’m pretty equal with all of them so I like to shoot whatever ammo is available. I do have a special place in my heart for my .22 Ruger MkIII too and would use it in a self defense situation as quickly as any of the others.


45 posted on 06/18/2015 11:48:29 AM PDT by JMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Cyman

If you can carry that concealed, your shirt size is likely sufficient deterrent from most trouble.


46 posted on 06/18/2015 11:52:33 AM PDT by G Larry (Obama Hates America, Israel, Capitalism, Freedom, and Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
I have also seen people knocked down by the .45, so his other argument is lacking.

That's what I thought too. Hit someone in the breastbone with a .45 or a .44 mag and they are going over.

Not to mention a rifle or shotgun round...and neither one of them has knocked me backwards since I was eight.

47 posted on 06/18/2015 11:55:45 AM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
9 is fine if you are shooting girls and sissies. :) You just don't lead them as much.

:snork:

48 posted on 06/18/2015 12:02:37 PM PDT by Old Sarge (Its the Sixties all over again, but with crappy music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
P220ST with Crimson Trace in .45 ACP for bedside work

 photo P1000575_zpstceditga.jpg

.

Smith & Wesson 1911 in .38 Super - range toy

 photo P1030852-PICASSA_zps2cibhxd0.jpg

49 posted on 06/18/2015 12:05:47 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
.357 Magnum.

Somebody had to say it.

125gr JHP at 1650fps.

Works every time.

50 posted on 06/18/2015 12:06:11 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

The concern with that is the safety of the four innocents line up behind the perp.


51 posted on 06/18/2015 12:10:45 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
" four innocents line up behind the perp."

Now that you mention it, I once witnessed an accidental discharge from a 6in S&W 586 with that very round.

Luckily nobody was hurt.

Nice clean hole inside the house but blew a 5in piece of stucco off the outer wall.

The bullet continued another 40ft and hit a F-150, blew through the radiator and splitting the case of the water pump.

It was enlightening.

52 posted on 06/18/2015 12:19:48 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

Something that will deliver more instant incapacitation.

incapacitation: is that a word?

The .40 came about from a police FBI shootout in Florida with criminals wearing armor. I am sure there were earlier calls for stronger LE rounds but this incident was the last straw. They complained of 9mm and 38sp ‘bouncing’ off the criminals and earlier complaints of 9mm taking too long to incapacitate an enraged or highly drugged perp.
They had trials with newly developed 10mm but it was too much, causing other problems... namely second shot accuracy and the liability that they foresaw in a wild second shot. They settled on the slightly lighter and cooler .40cal and it has gained popularity quicker than any other round in LE and in civilian markets.


53 posted on 06/18/2015 12:28:36 PM PDT by envisio (I ain't here long... I'm out of napalm and .22 bullets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
I think you got it exactly righr. The writer's whole argument is absurd.

While it has been advocated by many-a-misinformed-gun-counter commando that some sort of energy transfer occurs between a projectile and its target, this has been rejected by everyone ...

There absolutely is an energy transfer between the bullet and flesh. Anyone who has ever butchered a deer has seen the massive hemorrhaging that takes place. This damage occurs in flesh that was nowhere near the actual path of the projectile. When a bullet hits flesh, a pressure/shock wave travels through the surrounding flesh. The reason you want an expanding bullet is not so much to cut a bigger path through the body. It is to slow the bullet down more so that it imparts more of its energy into the target.

54 posted on 06/18/2015 12:28:44 PM PDT by j. earl carter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Manly Warrior

“...a 45 is 162% larger in area than a 9mm”

WRONG


55 posted on 06/18/2015 12:28:55 PM PDT by RipSawyer (Racism is racism, regardless of the race of the racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

So I guess “more power” is simple way of saying all the variables combined.


56 posted on 06/18/2015 12:30:27 PM PDT by envisio (I ain't here long... I'm out of napalm and .22 bullets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: x1stcav

Give me a fistful of .45 ACP any day.

...and the 1911 to go with it!


57 posted on 06/18/2015 12:33:08 PM PDT by rikkir (Anyone still believe the 8/08 Atlantic cover wasn't 100% accurate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: w1n1
Some false premises here. Foot pounds of energy can make a huge difference, especially if the target is wearing a "bullet-deterrent" vest. A .45ACP will rock the person seriously and a 9mm will hurt but not have the same effect. A .45ACP hollow point will also do more damage going through bone and tissue.

That said, I like a 9mm for personal protection and also use .380 pocket guns for same.

Different weapons have different ranges of utility and discounting fps and energy are not smart.

58 posted on 06/18/2015 12:36:06 PM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: envisio
Second shots are easier with the 9mm.

Practice much. I miss less with my 45 than any of my friends with their 9. I shoot waay more. Carry the biggest caliber you can be accurate with. It really is that simple.

59 posted on 06/18/2015 12:40:34 PM PDT by showme_the_Glory ((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

Strange, I keep getting 162% too. We’re talking frontal area; the areas of the holes in paper if both rounds used a wadcutter.

(.452/2)^2/(.355/2)^2 = 1.62

Since you’re only after the ratio, and both are multipled by pi, you can drop pi out.

Those are the diameters of the rounds in inches, and would be recognized by reloaders everywhere. Also works if you convert both to millimeters.


60 posted on 06/18/2015 12:50:04 PM PDT by Rinnwald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson