Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz May Require Background Check Before Letting Supporter Shoot With Him
Talking Points Memo's TPM DC ^ | June 6, 2015 | Brendan James

Posted on 06/06/2015 4:33:52 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) plans to take one lucky supporter with him on an upcoming "shooting excursion" as part of a recently launched fundraiser and sweepstakes for his presidential campaign. But there's a catch: the winner may have to endure a background check first.

The caveat is an interesting one given that Cruz helped lead the effort to defeat a 2013 bill that would have expanded background checks for gun sales nationwide. The bill, which was championed by President Obama in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, ultimately went down after an intense lobbying effort from pro-gun groups.

In an interview with TPM on Friday afternoon, Cruz spokesman Rick Tyler defended the contest's background check requirement and said it was "not inconsistent" with the senator's track record.

Tyler said Cruz had not taken issue with current system of background checks, but specifically opposed the 2013 bill, which would have imposed them on sales between private individuals.

Still, the background check for the contest may come as a surprise to some of Cruz's supporters.

It didn't appear on the entry page for the "Shoot With Cruz" contest when TPM viewed it on Friday or in an email about the contest that the campaign sent to supporters this week. (Sign up before June 10!)

It did appear, however, deep in the fine print for the contest, which was located on a separate page on the site. The same page defined the "sponsor" of the contest as "Cruz For President."

Promotion Rules. One (1) potential winner will be selected by a random drawing from all eligible entries to be held at the Cruz for President headquarters on Thursday, June 11, 2015. Sponsor may, at its option, conduct a background check on each potential winner. Sponsor reserves the right to disqualify any potential winner from receiving the Prize based on such background check if Sponsor determines, in its sole discretion that awarding the Prize to such potential winner could result in a safety or security risk to any person or persons or could result in the disruption of any event associated with the Promotion. Sponsor will, in its sole discretion, then select one (1) winner from the list of eligible potential winners on the basis of criteria determined and applied by Sponsor to provide for an appropriate range of views, backgrounds, and interests among the winners selected.

Although Cruz has used the contest as a fundraiser for low-dollar donors, the rules made clear no donation was required to enter. But they also said the campaign has no plans to pay the full fare for the winner.

"Winner will be responsible for securing all required licenses and for costs of transportation to attend the shooting excursion," the rules said, "including, but not limited to ground transportation, airfare, personal charges at lodging, telecommunications charges, security fees, taxes, or other expenses or incidentals are the responsibility solely of the winner."

Cruz's spokesman said the fine print regarding background checks was written so the contest would abide by the law.

"The language in the contest rules is written to be in compliance of various state laws, because some states would require background checks on a contest like this," Tyler said.

However, he added, he could not specify which laws, as they were not in front of him.

*****


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Outdoors; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2016election; 2ndamendment; banglist; election2016; gop; hunting; secondamendment; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Sounds smart to me. Just because someone entered an on-line contest doesn't mean they're really a Cruz supporter, safe to be around or even sane. BTW, hopefully I'll win.
1 posted on 06/06/2015 4:33:52 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Given the rabid hate from the left, it’s a good idea.


2 posted on 06/06/2015 4:36:41 PM PDT by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Cruz's spokesman said the fine print regarding background checks was written so the contest would abide by the law.


3 posted on 06/06/2015 4:37:43 PM PDT by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Doesn’t bother me, after all it just took one nutjob to take out Chris Kyle.


4 posted on 06/06/2015 4:42:03 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Certainly a prudent move. Don’t Presidential candidates have security assigned to them? This would be standard operating procedure.


5 posted on 06/06/2015 4:42:08 PM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There is a huge difference between a background check to exercise a God-given and constitutionally-protected right and a background check to shoot with the most qualified presidential candidate in many years. The liberals are using their usual “hypocrisy” accusation, but as usual, it’s disingenuous and dishonest.


6 posted on 06/06/2015 4:43:07 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

Sounds like its a legal requirement anyway.


7 posted on 06/06/2015 4:46:32 PM PDT by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Had Zer0 actually have ever fired a gun, and reached out to gun owners like this in 2008, other than try to disarm them, he would have done the same.

Look for this to be front page news in tbe NY Times.


8 posted on 06/06/2015 4:46:39 PM PDT by Sasparilla (If you want peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This isn’t a MANDATORY check to own a gun, it is a voluntary check to shoot with Cruz.


9 posted on 06/06/2015 4:51:46 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Smart move.


10 posted on 06/06/2015 4:52:05 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (The White House is now known as "Casa Blanca".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

Apparently, the guy that shot Chris never was in combat.


11 posted on 06/06/2015 4:56:12 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

I was thinking the same thing, and that was somebody he knew. It’s foolish to arrange a shooting outing with a stranger. Quite different from finding strangers at the same range.


12 posted on 06/06/2015 4:58:38 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Just to rule out convicted felons.

Lord knows there are enough of those running around in both parties to know you need to be careful.


13 posted on 06/06/2015 4:58:41 PM PDT by hadaclueonce (It is not heaven, it is Iowa. Everyone gets a "Corn Check")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

When I saw President Bush in a CPAC Event years ago, I had to have a Background Check done by the Secret Service.


14 posted on 06/06/2015 5:01:38 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Hillary, because it's time for a POTUS without a SCROTUS...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Curses,” said Hillary, slamming her gun safe shut. “He’s smarter than Vince, at least.”


15 posted on 06/06/2015 5:01:48 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ted Cruz is not the government.

You want to enter his contest, then you have to follow his rules.

As we know, controversial candidates are targets, so as with the president’s bodyguard, we aren’t talking about the American culture and the right to own weapons. We’re talking about a person who is a particular target.

Pamela Geller, also. She should be able to say what she wants, but it isn’t the government that’s targeting her. Because of that, it’s her responsibility to keep security at the top of her agenda..


16 posted on 06/06/2015 5:04:40 PM PDT by xzins (Donate to the Freep-a-Thon or lose your ONLY voice. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

No, presidential candidates don’t receive Secret Service protection until they’re the party nominee, except in special cases. Senator Cruz has bodyguards, but they are presumably paid for with campaign funds.


17 posted on 06/06/2015 5:07:06 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

A very smart move..otherwise you might have someone pretending to be a supporter, gets close enough to him and shoots him..you have to do a very thorough background check because you just never know


18 posted on 06/06/2015 5:10:11 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If you do, take a Marlin 60.


19 posted on 06/06/2015 5:14:55 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Had to sell mine, along with a sweet Winchester shotgun, because there “are children in the house” to quote my first wife. Got next to nothing for them.


20 posted on 06/06/2015 5:18:37 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson