You can too!
Donate Please!
Help End FReepathons by Donating Monthly! Generous FReeper Sponsors are donating $10 for every New Monthly Donor! Please Sign Up today!
this just in
wikipedia..to become OBAMAPEDIA!
That’s Barack HUSSEIN Obama.
Does it have anything about his raging homosexuality?
Wikipedia is a good source for summaries of TV episodes, movie spoilers and biographies of comic book characters.
It is far too biased for anything other than entertainment.
Oh wow you can’t count on Wikipedia giving anything like a “fair and balanced view” huh.
Maybe there should be something like a Foxpedia.
Obama is pure light. Come on everyone join my new cult!
When did Wikipedia EVER have a “neutral point of view”?
My students get upset when I tell them they can’t use Wikipedia as a source.
When they ask why I tell them Wikipedia is garbage.
Then they get even more upset.
In Bush’s article we read about poor attendance at Guard meetings and alcohol abuse.
And now class, give three examples of a tautology.
1) Wikipedia is biased.
2) Water is wet.
3) The Gooch is a pimp.
NAMBOLA - the love that dares not speak its name.
motto - "We're not as bad as NAMBLA, as far as YOU know!"
ANYBODY who trusts or relies on Wikipedia as the sole or main source of information on ANY topic, is making a wrong choice. Wikipedia is FILLED with biased and flat-out WRONG information, yet too many people, including a vast number of FReepers, assume that if it's in Wikipedia, it's not wrong. Such people set themselves up to be manipulated in a very extreme way.
SKIP WIKIPEDIA if you have any brains.
Wikipedia is a known leftist biased site. It’s fine if you want to look up rock bands, not to be trusted for anything political or social.
Those quotes were sourced so unbelievably neutrally, from the Obama favorite media sources. And yet they weren’t allowed in.
I remember learning about Pravda in the Soviet Union and just getting shivers at not having a free press. Ha, didn’t think we would be worse in my own lifetime.
This would be a question I would want a free media to ask. Just to ask the thin air, just to talk about it. Why can’t this be written about? Why won’t wikipedia allow it? I imagine everyone with access to airwaves is shushed by their bosses, but why are their bosses, why are these news corporations, not shouting it to the rooftops? If they all joined together for a day of discussion (using their talking points a la “gravitas” et al) on the air of this least transparent admin, then obama can’t ban them ALL from access to the WH. That is their ace in the hole. Obama can’t kill them all. They got together for the letter; they need to get together and get this discussed by the American People, who are supposed to own the government.