Posted on 04/05/2015 5:08:30 PM PDT by rightistight
A feminist magazine has declared that men who like breasts are sexist.
In an article titled, So Youre a Breasts Man? Here Are 3 Reasons That Could Be Sexist, Jenika McCrayer explains why men who are sexually attracted to women with breasts are misogynists.
McCrayer explains that under a patriarchal system were taught to believe that the female body exists solely for a mans sexual pleasure and entertainment. She then explains several reasons why liking breasts is a bad thing.
First, It Dangerously Conflates Attraction and Fetishization. She explains, breasts are not solely for aesthetic or sexual purposes. They have a function. And there are painful consequences to fetishizing body parts associated with womanhood.
More than that, its cisnormative to equate breasts with femininity and womanhood. Not everyone who has breasts is a woman, and not all women have breasts.
Second, Fetishization Leads to Objectification and Dehumanization. McCrayer writes, Reducing people to their anatomy creates this space that some if not most of us exist outside of because we dont fit into the male gazes narrow categories of what it means to be attractive or a woman.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepunditpress.com ...
I like bewbs. Just not so much on Bruce Jenner.
Not just the homosexuals, the entire spectrum of alternative gender/sexual identities, because they consider “normal” even as in the demographic norm to be too much of an implied judgment on them.
You had to go there, didn’t you?
OMG I’m laughing so hard I’ll never get to sleep now... :) That’s GREAT!
Wow. In the right hands, the poor dear might actually appreciate her own bewbs as sexual objects.
“Objectify me, objectify me, just yank my hair first!”
The poor dear.
Just crazy.
SHE's the one with a sexist mindset. Some men enjoy their flabby breast implants too. Just ask Richard Speck.
Marxist Feminisms Ruined Lives (Frontpagemag.com 9-2-2014 Mallory Millett (sister of NOW founder Kate Millett)
And so began my period as an unwitting witness to history. I stayed with Kate and her lovable Japanese husband, Fumio, in a dilapidated loft on The Bowery as she finished her first book, a PhD thesis for Columbia University, Sexual Politics.It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a consciousness-raising-group, a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China. We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:
Why are we here today? she asked.
To make revolution, they answered.
What kind of revolution? she replied.
The Cultural Revolution, they chanted.
And how do we make Cultural Revolution? she demanded.
By destroying the American family! they answered.
How do we destroy the family? she came back.
By destroying the American Patriarch, they cried exuberantly.
And how do we destroy the American Patriarch? she replied.
By taking away his power!
How do we do that?
By destroying monogamy! they shouted.
How can we destroy monogamy?
Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?
By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality! they resounded.
They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women. It was clear they desired nothing less than the utter deconstruction of Western society. The upshot was that the only way to do this was to invade every American institution. Every one must be permeated with The Revolution: The media, the educational system, universities, high schools, K-12, school boards, etc.; then, the judiciary, the legislatures, the executive branches and even the library system.
It fell on my ears as a ludicrous scheme, as if they were a band of highly imaginative children planning a Brinks robbery; a lark trumped up on a snowy night amongst a group of spoiled brats over booze and hashish.
Homosexuals are sexist, they reject those who are unlike themselves.
Feminists dont represent me or any woman that I resemble.
Sarah Pailin - She Represents!
Ok you freepers gonna get fresh.
: > )
bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.