I would tend to agree with them. Peter Higgs, for the moment, seems to have nailed it. Symmetry was broken within a trillionth of a trillionth of a second after the big bang.
“Hawking and his ilk deny any such thing.”
Interesting that the author says in the article that he agrees with Hawking ...
The most “simple” of single-celled organisms are stupendously complex. It’s laughable to believe such stupendous complexity could arise from random processes. For those who disagree, throw some chemicals together and create life from scratch. Then get back with me.
In reality, life springing from lifeless chemicals is about as scientific as wishful thinking.
I don’t get it.
In the article , Meisner says that a variance of 2-3% doesn’t make a difference. Then he goes on in the next paragraph to say that very small variances do make a difference.
In either case, their ‘proof’ consists of computer models.
How is a model considered ‘proof’ ?
ok, this is going to be good.
http://www.amazon.com/The-Self-Aware-Universe-Amit-Goswami/dp/0874777984
“The Self-Aware Universe.”
He proposes that there is something that has to and must be an overarching entity that controls all the collapse and all the entanglements, such that we all see and experience the same things.
From a Christian perspective, I say, ya, obviously. But it is really interesting to see physics coming to a similar point.
As in all physics, they are studying Gods principles and His creation, yet most people don’t want to admit it. Especially when their studies point back to Him.
I watched a show the other night about the Large Hadron Collider and the Higgs Boson. Here’s what I took away.
Bigger stuff is made of smaller stuff, and you’d be surprised how small some stuff is.
No God, Only One Universe (Not Possible)
God, Only One Universe (Possible)
No God, Multiverse (Possible)
God, Multiverse (Possible)
If No God, then must be a Multiverse.