I don’t get it.
In the article , Meisner says that a variance of 2-3% doesn’t make a difference. Then he goes on in the next paragraph to say that very small variances do make a difference.
In either case, their ‘proof’ consists of computer models.
How is a model considered ‘proof’ ?
Computer models are incredibly powerful.
For instance, mere thermometers show that the Earth has been cooling for 18 years and 4 months. But computer models have proven that the Earth is getting warmer.
You ask, “How is a computer model considered proof?” the
Well, that’s all that the global warmists have. They don’t have real “proof”!