Posted on 01/04/2015 6:03:18 AM PST by HomerBohn
Attorney Orly Taitz has continued to pursue all avenues to bring to light Barack Hussein Obamas fraudulent IDs and history. While she has sought to have several cases involving Obamas Social Security number, birth certificate and selective service form reviewed by courts, they have dismissed her attempts. Now, in light of recent reports that attorney and wife of actor George Clooney, Amal Almuddin Clooney, was threatened with arrest by Egyptian officials after she identified flaws in Egypts judicial system, Taitz has written to petition the London-based British-Lebanese lawyer to investigate Obamas fraudulent IDs.
Amal is a human right attorney, known for her representation of Julian Assange and Yulia Timoshenko. Even though she was a failure in both cases, she was not able to free either one of them, she wrote. Assange is still hiding in the Ecuadorian embassy and Timoshenko sat in prison until the Maidan revolution in Ukraine. However, Clooney is being promoted as this great attorney, possibly due to her efforts to embarrass the government of Egypt, which stopped Obama supported Muslim Brotherhood uprising. Obama is clearly not happy with his failures in Egypt.
Clooneys father is Druze, which is a quasi-Muslim sect in Lebanon that is part of Shia Islam, while her mother is a Sunni Muslim. Several reports have described the barrister as Muslim. As far as I know, she has not been vocal enough to determine if she is Muslim or not.
Clooney did represent three Al Jazeera journalists who were accused of aiding the Muslim Brotherhood and now serving time in jail in Cairo. This is why all the attention of late has been focused on her.
Pick up Bradlee Dean's powerful testimony, illustrated by former DC Comics artist Danny Bulanadi, in the Sons of Liberty Store.
As a result, Taitz has taken the opportunity to put the spotlight on Clooney and either get her to act or expose her as a phony.
This current letter to Amal Clooney is seeking her actions in investigating corruption and criminality in the US government and judiciary, which allowed a charlatan with a stolen CT Social Security number and bogus IDs, Soebarkah-Soetoro-Obama, to sit in the WH for 6 years and do such an enormous damage to this nation, Taitz wrote.
Regardless of what Amal Clooney does, it is a win -win situation for us, added Taitz. If she chooses to investigate Obamas usurpation of the US presidency with bogus IDs, it is great, we might get closer to removal from office and criminal investigation of Obama. If she does nothing, well expose yet another liberal phony.
I like Orly Taitz and have had the pleasure of speaking to her on several occasions. With that in mind, I think the latter is more the outcome rather than the former. After all, George Clooney is known to be a good friend of Obama. Does anyone actually think Clooneys wife will be investigating Obama? I think not. Although, I would be very happy to be proven wrong.
Heres the letter Taitz sent to Mrs. Clooney:
Dear Barrister Clooney,
Recently Barbara Walters named you a person of the year. You are well known for representing Julian Assange and Yulia Timoshenko and recently you made news again due to your claims that you were threatened with an arrest in Egypt for criticizing the Egyptian government and Egyptian judiciary.
I am sending this open letter to you, to urge you to look at the corruption and flagrant criminality in the US government, particularly during Obama regime.
I am forwarding to you this file, attached, Table of evidence of forgery and fraud showing Barack Obamas using a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never issued to him, but rather issued to a resident of Connecticut born in 1890 and presumed to be deceased with no heirs. The file, also, provides a sworn affidavit from a retired Chief Investigator of the US Coast Guard stating that Obamas selective Service certificate is a flagrant forgery. This 150 page file shows expert opinions and affidavits of government officials attesting to the fact that citizen of Indonesia, born in Kenya, Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Soebarkah, aka Barack Obama is using all fabricated IDs.
This was never heard on the merits. Top US officials, including Attorney General of the US Eric Holder, Commissioner of Social Security, Carolyn Colvin and a number of high ranked judges committed treason in being complicit in this cover up.
Civil rights attorneys, like myself, were persecuted. In multiple cases documents were removed from court records and falsified. In one case in Eastern District of Pennsylvania, a court reporter removed 14 pages, the whole cross examination of a party, from the official transcript and removed all mention of these pages from the table of contents. Subsequent complaints to the Chief Judge of the District, Chief Judge of the Circuit, Judicial Council, District Attorney of Philadelphia did not yield any action for a period of 4 years.
I believe, that the ruling international oligarchy picked Obama as they sought the most compromised puppet, they could find on the face of the planet, to pull 9 trillion dollars of accumulated National debt in just 6 years of Obama regime, trillions of dollars redirected from the US treasury and US taxpayers into the pockets of the oligarchs. A compromised puppet with bogus IDs will do anything, and he sure did.
So, I hope that as a human rights attorney, fighting corruption and lawlessness in the government, you will be willing to investigate and bring to the international media all evidence of corruption, criminality and treason in the US government and US judiciary.
Sincerely,
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
That’s a lot of words to say: “no, I don’t have an alternative suggestion.”
I’m not surprised you missed my point. You missed Palin’s point as well, and go to great lengths to prove you missed it. Missing points is evidently one of the things you do best.
So while you’re at it, why not answer my question, which you earliest sidestepped. Namely, how can the Permanent Political Class be both the problem and the solution?
This time, how about an answer?
‘My money is on there being other individuals posting here and lurking here who, like me, want to see the Obama eligibility issue resolved once and for all, either by congressional action or by a grand jury investigation and possible indictment but not by these (226 and counting) interminable lawsuits.’
Well I just heard from one of the ‘lurkers’ via PM. The PMer explained to me that you are a troll. The PMer also explained how a certain type of Obama-related eligibility lawsuit could succeed.
So your opinion on what ‘lurkers’ are thinking is about as accurate as your comprehension of what Palin said about the Permanent Political Class.
Might want/need to try a different approach, NG.
Wow, a sample of one lurker! Impressive.
I already answered your question. The way to avoid the negatives of the entrenched permanent political class is via using elected local and state-level judges who are accountable to the voters plus term-limited state legislators and local and state level elected prosecutors who can convene grand juries composed of between 12 and 23 average citizens (in most jurisdictions) who can hand down criminal indictments.
I used the Arkansas Whitewater Grand Jury as an example.
The Permanent Political Class is a potential solution because only the Supreme Court of the United States can hand down landmark opinions that alter the existing legal landscape and only the United States Congress has the power of impeachment, trial and removal from office for High Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Let me give you another example of what I mean. A former attorney who represented challengers to Obama’s constitutional eligibility in several lawsuits, Gary Kreep, is now an elected judge in San Diego County, California.
Now how about you stop side-stepping my question to you: what are your suggested strategies for resoloving the Obama eligibility issue without involving the permanent political class?
You know what they say. For every person who takes the time to write & send, there are x many others thinking the same thing. In your case, the sentiment is quite common, and that was by no means the first time I’d heard it or the only poster I’d heard it from.
I have been instructed to stop feeding the troll. It was good advice. There is zero evidence that you read even one word of what I wrote re: Obama’s eligibility and the political situation. Or if you read it, you didn’t understand it. Give me one good reason why I should take that kind of time all over again, when the party I am writing to is either purposefully pretending to be obtuse, or is in fact as thick as a brick.
Amal Clooney, and lists her case profile, as well as her specialisms; international law, human rights, extradition and criminal law.
‘I already answered your question. The way to avoid the negatives of the entrenched permanent political class is via using elected local and state-level judges who are accountable to the voters plus term-limited state legislators and local and state level elected prosecutors who can convene grand juries composed of between 12 and 23 average citizens (in most jurisdictions) who can hand down criminal indictments.’
So why, for hundreds if not thousands of posts, had you previously said Congress should do it? Why the sudden shift?
I.e.: the US Congress.
There is no sudden shift. I answered your hypothetical concerning how the Obama ineligibility issue might be addressed without the involvement of the permanent political class. I presented an alternative strategy. There is no reason why my preferred strategies of congressional committee hearings plus criminal grand jury investigations and the alternative strategy of working at the state and local level involving only term limited and elected officials couldn’t be implemented at the same time.
Grand juries are composed of average citizens who are not a part of the permanent political class. Don’t you think that it would be a good idea for average Americans to finally get an organized and systematic look at all the evidence that has been accumulated over the last seven years?
I have always maintained that a grand jury investigation was needed to advance the ineligibility issue. Grand juries can draw national and international media attention and the best possible outcome could be actual indictments.
I couldn’t help but notice that you still haven’t responded to my question. What is your suggestion on how to resolve the Obama eligibility issue without the involvement of the congressional and judicial permanent political class?
Yes, you shifted. Go back to your own posting history and count how many times your ‘solution’ depended on Boehner. As I said, hundreds, if not thousands of times. It was finally pounded into you how stupid that idea was, and you shifted.
I already answered your question. It’s not my fault if you (1) are pretending you couldn’t understand my answer, or (2) genuinely are too thick to comprehend it.
Well thanks for your thoughtful, insightful response, whatever it was!
If you really think that responding to your inquiry means that I have altered my basic position, then there’s not much more I can say other than I fully stand by my stated suggested strategy for resolving the Obama eligibility issue via congressional hearings coupled with a grand jury investigation.
Both congressional subpoenas and grand jury subpoenas could clear up the Queens/Kapiolani debate once and for all but both hospitals are in the state of Hawaii.
Its been great fun debating this issue with you but I’m done now. You take good care and keep on fighting the good birther fight.
‘Both congressional subpoenas and grand jury subpoenas could clear up the Queens/Kapiolani debate’
The only Queens/Kapiolani debate is the one Obama was having with himself. He’s the one who alternately claimed both hospitals. This is because he wasn’t born in either one, and he was trying frantically to find out which one would go along with his desperate charade.
Kapiolani plopped, and not only displayed his lying letter but fundraised off it. The instant, however, it was pointed out that it was fraudulent to fundraise off the letter If It Was Based On A Lie [i.e.: if in fact Obama wasn’t really born at Kapiolani], the fundraising stopped and the letter disappeared from public view.
As for the ‘congressional subpoenas’ that you have advocated for years, literally, they would have to originate with Boehner. So instead of glossing over the buffoonery of this idea, in future why not honestly suggest, ‘subpoenas okayed and supported by Boehner’—so everyone can get in on the laugh.
If you were a conservative you would understand how tedious and futile your suggestions are. Neither I nor anyone else would have to explain it. [Although—hint—Palin has explained it already, & very well at that.] This is why no bona fide conservative has ever wasted so much time making the same lame suggestion over and over and over and over. We get it. You do not.
Or else you get it very well, but you are a troll, purposefully mucking up thread after thread with purely diversionary comments. Given the sheer volume of your repetitiveness, this is the most likely scenario.
Glad to hear you’re backing off. It’s about time.
Thought for the day: When a country’s fate rests in hands of a purely and thoroughly corrupt Permanent Political Class, it is lunacy to suggest that same group of Corruptocrats, or their handmaidens in the judiciary, will do the politically costly thing, as opposed to the politically expedient thing, and deliver the country from the status quo—even if the status quo is entirely and precipitously destructive.
That you can declare (while apparently keeping a perfectly straight face) that "context doesn't matter" is a good example of why you're a loon and not worth debating. Of course context matters. That's why taking a comment out of context is -- for more rational debaters -- a logical fallacy and a sign of bad faith.
Actually, a number of others have. But that's not my gauge of effective debate: it's the number of times I can make a point or ask a question that the other person ignores or answers only with rambling incoherence. Putting my point about the Hawaii verifications and their import under the Full Faith & Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution is a salient case in point. First you lied about answering; then you tried to claim you ignored it.
Which reminds me, you didn't answer to this question on the other thread:
But, do tell me, when a poster first tries to claim she answered to a person's MAIN point, but then can't back up that claim, only later to take a different approach and claim she had ignored the point because it wasn't important, what would you call that?
Dishonest? Self-contradictory? Lame? Inept?
I think any of those tags would fit your argument style well.
Gosh, and I was so looking forward to your answer.
In context or stand alone, those two comments you made were the epitome of stupid.
This trollish behavior is getting bizarre. But it is Obot-trollery 101. The only thing, in this case, I wonder about is the following. Are you just pretending you don’t understand...or can you really not understand? I had a higher opinion of your intellect prior to the discussion re: Stanley Ann’s whereabouts during her pregnancy. Prior to that, I would have concluded that you actually do understand the various posts I’ve made, but you are just pretending not so as to support your trollish behavior.
Now, I think it’s likely you really don’t understand. What a shame.
And speaking of (genuinely) unanswered questions, please do reveal where Obama plans to send all the US citizens he may get decide to ‘deport’ After all, just because he is [according to you] showing preference at the moment to US criminals doesn’t mean he always will. He’s said illegals have as much right to the US as citizens. He’s given illegals access to benefits that American citizens have paid for, and will continue to pay for. Who’s to say he won’t decide that the punishment for US citizen criminals should be on par with the punishment for illegal alien criminals?
Where will he deport the US criminals to, pray tell? You are so big and arrogant about your manufactured, pretend inconsistencies & so-called unanswered questions. How about naming the place of deportation to which US criminals would be sent, were Obama at some point to decide not to favor them over illegals? [Hint: he already favors illegals across the board. Only an Obot would claim otherwise.]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.