Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Don't Rioters Protest Black Crime?
Enza Ferreri Blog ^ | 25 November 2014 | Enza Ferreri

Posted on 11/25/2014 2:49:42 PM PST by Enza Ferreri

A business burns during the riots in Ferguson after the grand jury verdict

The very fact that people think they are justified in committing criminal acts just because they are not happy with a verdict which any person with a moderately-endowed brain can recognise as entirely reasonable and based on physical evidence shows how these people are the least capable of judging that verdict.

They are criminals. They find any excuse for their antisocial and violent behaviour. Of course they side with their fellow delinquent Michael Brown against the man who represents the law, Officer Darren Wilson.

And the race-industry leaders, the media and politicians, who have kept telling us for decades that we must be colour blind, all of a sudden discover that they can't be blind to colour. So, every time they mention the shooting's victim they have to say that he was black, and whenever they refer to the policeman who pulled the fatal trigger they must add that he is white.

The black protesters and rioters obviously go along with that, demonstrating that colour blindness is something they appeal to only when it suits them. If opening their eyes to chromatic differences is in their interest, they start seeing who's black and who's white. They never believed in this nonsense themselves.

Obama, the worst and most stupid president of the USA that ever existed, in his speech after the verdict of non-indictment described the protests as legitimate ways to express concern about real problems. But they are not legitimate, and the problems are not real. He is responsible for not trying to calm these subversives who listen to him because he's black like them. And these are the anti-racists, of course.

"13 Facts About Ferguson the Media Will Never Tell You" from Newsmax:

According to protesters who erupted in violence after a grand jury declined to indict Officer Darren Wilson in the shooting death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., this was the case of a white policeman shooting an unarmed black teenager with his hands in the air in a community plagued by racial tension.

That's an account promoted by many in the mainstream media as well. But here are several facts about the case that are harder to find:

1. Surveillance video showed that shortly before the confrontation, 18-year-old Brown stole cigarillos from a convenience store and shoved a clerk who tried to stop him.

2. The autopsy report showed that Brown had marijuana in his system when he died.

3. Officer Wilson, driving to the call of a medical emergency, first encountered Brown walking in the middle of a street and told Brown and his friend to walk on the sidewalk. Brown responded with an expletive.

4. Wilson chose to confront Brown only after he saw the cigarillos in his hand and recalled the radio report of a robbery at the convenience store.

5. Wilson said when he tried to open his car door, Brown slammed it back shut, then punched Wilson in the face.

6. Fearing another punch could knock him out, Wilson drew his gun, he told the grand jury, and Brown grabbed the gun, saying "you are too much of a pussy to shoot me."

7. An African-American witness confirmed that Brown and Wilson appeared to be "arm-wrestling" by the car.

8. Another witness saw Brown leaning through the car's window and said "some sort of confrontation was taking place."

9. After Wilson fired a shot that struck Brown's hand, Brown fled and Wilson gave chase. Brown suddenly stopped. An unidentified witness told the grand jury that 6-foot-4, 292-pound Brown charged at Wilson with his head down. Wilson said Brown put his hand under the waistband of his pants as he continued toward Wilson. That's when Wilson fired.

10. A witness testified that Brown never raised his hands.

11. Gunpowder found on the wound on Brown's hand indicated his hand was close to the gun when it fired. According to a report, the hand wound showed foreign matter "consistent with products that are discharged from the barrel of a firearm."

12. Judy Melinek, a forensic pathologist who reviewed the autopsy for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, said the gunpowder "supports the fact that this guy is reaching for the gun, if he has particulate matter in the wound."

13. Wilson said Brown was physically uncontrollable and "for lack of a better word, crazy." He said that during the confrontation, he was thinking: "He's gonna kill me. How do I survive?" Legal experts say police officers typically have wide latitude to use deadly force when they feel their safety is threatened.



TOPICS: Government; Politics; Reference; Society
KEYWORDS: darrenwilson; ferguson; michaelbrown; rioters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Enza Ferreri

Why don’t cockroaches protest people who leave food particles on their kitchen counters or behind their refrigerators?


21 posted on 11/25/2014 4:01:54 PM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (At no time was the Obama administration aware of what the Obama administration was doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

I always thought it was for free stuff.


22 posted on 11/25/2014 4:16:57 PM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Enza Ferreri

Criminals don’t criticize themselves. PERIOD!


23 posted on 11/25/2014 4:34:50 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Right, it isn't fair to be faced with a gun when you want to beat someone to death!!

"Unarmed" is the most abused word of the day.

24 posted on 11/25/2014 5:39:16 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enza Ferreri

The fact that the left machine had to seize upon both the Trayvon/Zimmerman episode and the Mike Brown/Wilson affair seem to indicate desperation on the part of the race-monger “leadership”.

Think about it, in a nation of 300 million, why couldn’t they find cases where an actual white racist kills a black person out of hatred? The fact that apparently they can’t should be instructive.

Every where we go we see interracial relationships, interracial families, black-white friendships, integrated churches, schools, we have a black President for land’s sake. We are even committing crimes together now. What we see is not totally harmonious but is a far cry from the picture we see from the media.

So, is it that the race-hustle power structure is feeling threatened by the melding of the races, that no one can deny is going on?

If there’s so much animosity, why are these two the best examples they can find?

It’s about power, and somebody thinks they are losing theirs.


25 posted on 11/26/2014 6:57:30 AM PST by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson