Posted on 03/16/2014 8:21:40 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
Barack Hussein Obama’s birth riddle is being analyzed in a 13 page, Amicus Curiae brief filed with the Alabama Supreme Court by Harvard Attorney Albert W.L. Moore Jr. The brief promises to offer a straightforward theory as to just who this man in our White House really and truly is. (1)
Moore summarizes what is going on: “He (BHO) was a natural born American on the date of his birth, but further official records prove that he lost American citizenship and constitutional eligibility to the Presidency as definitively confirmed by his 1983 naturalization as an American citizen. By law, this process of naturalization did NOT restore his constitutional eligibility.”
Filed on 13 May, 2013, Attorney Moore (pg. 10) is asking that the AL Supreme Court remand the Obama eligibility conundrum back to the trial court to seek discovery concerning the following: a. subpoenaing his (BHO) DNA; b. all of his Hawai’ian “vital records consisting of an original birth certificate showing his ACTUAL (CiR emphasis) birth parents and his amended birth certificate showing his adoptive parents.” The Moore Amicus further contends that Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama Sr, a Luo tribesman...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
BO does have a “half-sister”. Maybe they could compare their DNA.
“Defeatism is not the way to win wars.”
Not defeatist at all. Years of societal indoctrination into political correctness and white guilt prevent the removal of the black president under any circumstance. He can barely be publicly criticized. He must be defeated in another way. The only way I can think of short of a military coup, is to hold the house (sans Boehner) and win the senate. Obama will likely get to appoint at least one more SC justice before he is done. This must not come to pass.
Potentially Expatriating Acts
Section 349 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1481), as amended, states that U.S. nationals are subject to loss of nationality if they perform certain specified acts voluntarily and with the intention to relinquish U.S. nationality. Briefly stated, these acts include:
obtaining naturalization in a foreign state upon one’s own application after the age of 18 (Sec. 349 (a) (1) INA);
taking an oath, affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state or its political subdivisions after the age of 18 (Sec. 349 (a) (2) INA);
entering or serving in the armed forces of a foreign state engaged in hostilities against the United States or serving as a commissioned or non-commissioned officer in the armed forces of a foreign state (Sec. 349 (a) (3) INA);
accepting employment with a foreign government after the age of 18 if (a) one has the nationality of that foreign state or (b) an oath or declaration of allegiance is required in accepting the position (Sec. 349 (a) (4) INA);
formally renouncing U.S. nationality before a U.S. diplomatic or consular officer outside the United States (sec. 349 (a) (5) INA);
formally renouncing U.S. nationality within the United States (The Department of Homeland Security is responsible for implementing this section of the law) (Sec. 349 (a) (6) INA);
conviction for an act of treason against the Government of the United States or for attempting to force to overthrow the Government of the United States (Sec. 349 (a) (7) INA).
Registration at that time was not required of men born before 1960.
What you describe is defeatism. I do not accept defeat; you do.
Thus my tagline.
I followed sven’s comments when he was active; my only quibble (if he was correct, which he sounded as though he may very well have been) is that Zero was using a fake name/parentage/birth info at that time, so how legal were any of the twists and turns?
Thank you, we are on the same page.
actually Sven nails the perp w/ law......spend time where sven responds to quality detailed questions in several posts...the answers are in his body of work
to me what Sven lays out is not so much who where when but HOW.....to nail the man
Doesn't he still have a half-sister living? What about his grampa's corpse?
“in 1979 young men did not have to register for the draft. I was 21 years old then and didn’t have to...”
“Are you sure about that? You may well be a criminal.”
Fairly new member. Maybe he’s just mistaken. Don’t know exactly...but the statement has a lot of mis-information and misdirection in it.
For instance. No, in ‘79 you didn’t have to “register for the draft” as there was no draft. However, starting in 1980 you had to register for selective service. Or face penalties. I know. I’m the same age, almost to the day, as Obama. Or as old as he claims to be anyway.
I saw a selective service registration posted for Obama. If it was real, and it was posted as legitimate, then that was a bigger joke of a forgery than the B.C.
So, yea, The Public Eye. You had to register for selective service. Don’t know what you can do about it now. I haven’t checked on the penalties as I registered as required. You might want to check on it though.
I see. The “who” can always be determined at some point. I want him in perp’s chair in federal court. And all those who helped him.
DNA autosomal recessive gene testing of one or the other or both of Barack and Michelle Obama’s White House children and any other alleged Barack Obama children and any of the alleged half siblings or alleged cousins, aunts, uncles, of Barack Obama would prove whether or not the person named Barack Obama Sr were related by blood. Ditto to compare their DNA to the children, cousins, second cousins or their offspring of Malcolm X. Ditto to compare their DNA to the cousins or second cousins or their offspring of Frank Marshall Davis. One would also find out who else who has been tested already in one of the DNA databases is his relative or how far removed.
Maybe he'll get drafted, or have to move to Canada. I hear it's not nice there this time of year.
LOL!!! I’m not sure tho, I’m thinkin’ Reggie isn’t some damn spitter like that Lewinski chippie.....
Barack Hussein Obama, II has a second cousin (once removed) named Milton Wolf, M.D.
Dr. Wolf is a diagnostic radiologist in Kansas City, Kansas and he is the Tea Party endorsed challenger to Kansas Senator Pat Roberts in the 2014 Republican Primary.
Dr. Wolf has called his cousin “the worst president in American history.”
Under Hawaii Revised Statutes 338-18(b), Dr. Wolf qualifies as a relative who is able to receive a copy of Barack Hussein Obama II’s Certificate of Live Birth.
If Barack Obama’s real father was either Malcolm X or Frank Marshall Davis that would clarify that Obama is indeed a natural born citizen since Malcolm Little was born in Omaha, Nebraska and Frank Marshall Davis was born in Arkansas Ciry, Kansas. But that new information would definitely hurt Obama if he decided to run for a third term!
He was born a British subject.
“Moore summarizes what is going on: “He (BHO) was a natural born American on the date of his birth”
And he knows that How? He has nothing but a completely fabricated Birth certificate. While much of what Moore says is plausible. Some of it does not make any sense. And just how does Moore come to all these conclusions with even having all the evidence he is now seeking.
Sir, I too have been following Sven and agree with his analysis. It is time to make a big “Issue’ out of all of this. People complain, all laws are null and void. Biden will be POTUS. No one will do anything. He will never be impeached.
So what. Hit this Fraud where it hurts. It will stop him from stealing more money and appointing more of his people. If it stops the take-over by BO & Co. as Dictators, then I am all for bring out everything we can. He has messed with our Vets. He has made fools of honest business persons. He has defrauded MANY elections. Hit him with every scandal, innuendo, etc...Hopefully he will not be able to skip out of the country later and get his $Billions he has hidden.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.