Posted on 02/09/2014 9:26:46 AM PST by Errant
Parenthetical clauses are used throughout scripture to explain how, why, when and where in close proximity to the main subject and verb.
Parentheses in the book of The Revelation explain cause and effect. They tie together the events that happen previously, to the events that transpire subsequently on the prophetic timeline. Unfortunately, parentheses, as a literary devise, come centuries after the actual parenthetical clauses so prevalent in both Hebrew and Greek linguistic constructions. Because of their late arrival into the English language, the parentheticals in the book of The Revelation have never been either deservedly researched or accurately articulated. Now, after more than 40 years in the making, The Chronological Gospels is complete with all of the extensive parenthetical clauses accurately assigned throughout the book of The Revelation.
Now, with its impending fulfillment looming large on the horizon, The Revelation can finally be understood with clarity and lived with integrity. This one feature (the parenthetical clauses in The Revelation) in The Chronological Gospels is worth one thousand times the price of the book itself.
Join Michael Rood for the first of the last four teachings on the very last book of the Bible, “Parenthetically Speaking (Before We Are Saved From the Wrath To Come)”.
So you're admitting you guys are spreading a different gospel and a different Jesus then that of the Biblical Jesus and His message? .. and why is it so hard for you to use the name of Jesus? and choose to concoct vocabulary that swings away form the Gospel Of Jesus Christ?
Beautiful!
But all in pieces stretched out over 750 posts...So now you are finished, eh??? But one more little thing...
The “House of Israel” is the ten northern tribes that were taken to Assyria, and later migrated along the rim of the Mediterranean; the very same people that Paul, James, and Peter wrote their epistles to.
So they weren't lost after all???
But Jesus didn't preach to anyone on the North side of the Mediterranean...You said the House of Israel was not in Judea but that's where Jesus went to preach...He spent all his time among the House of Judah instead of the House of Israel...What's up with that???
Torah is the “Law of Liberty,” as opposed to the Pharisees’ “ordinances” that were “hung on the cross.”
Well that's good...Even if we don't know what they were...
But that still leaves the 613 ordinances God gave to his people that are part of the Law as recorded in the scriptures that you are under...
Well then perhaps false witnesses aren't real Christians!
it doesn't take much to see he's off the path of Christianity....and not only in a pit but taking others with him.
You've been offered the opportunity countless times to present a single scripture where upon Michael Rood has misrepresented. Again, your false testimony against Michael Rood condemns you.
You are certainly free to plaster FR with his junk...
That's a nice change! Previously you've stated that you would never allow it!!
Keep working on knowing who the real Yeshua is, that you may open your eyes before it's too late and discover the dark spirit you are now following isn't who you think it is.
I've lost count of the number of times you've been a false witness against Michael Rood, myself, and others on this thread alone. I'm betting somewhere though that there is someone who is keeping an accurate tally.
What you are trying to ‘do’ is say that if you fail, {and you surely will}, to follow the OT law in all it’s detail, and pick what you want to follow, then you can jump to the New Testament and claim Christ’s blood temporarily.
Do you ever tire of spreading falsehood and confusion? How many times must I and others correct your blatant distortions? We have fully explained Yeshua's plan for salvation many times now.
The Old Testament is but a shadow of His coming....it all says ‘He’s coming’.....the New Testament says ‘He’s here’....and Revelations tells us ‘HE’s coming again’.
You are embarrassing yourself and your clown posse. The end was fully described from the beginning in the Torah, including the "he's here" and "he's coming again" parts.
Don't be hatin' Elsie... :)
Hey Friend, if you bothered to read the full chain of comments you would know that CB was the one who was complaining about someone coming into the thread - like it was his. I was merely pointing out that I was the one who started this thread. But don't let fact spoil your childish sport.
If crap attracts flies, to me it would make more sense to remove the crap BEFORE you try to get rid of the flies!
That stinky pile you've landed on Elsie was deposited by your BFF CB.
God raised Him (Rom. 10:9, 1 Pet. 1:21).
The Father raised Him (Gal. 1:1; Eph. 1:17,20).
The Spirit raised Him (Romans 8:11)
And...
Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. (John 2:19)
Hear O Israel...
National clown shortage may be approaching, trade organizations fear
Yes, intended as such, especially since so many muddy the waters otherwise..... More is not always better...it’s just more.
Accepted... Unless of course, it changes the truth of the matter... Which in this case, it does.
I didn't call it the Torah. YHWH did. It means 'instructions'.
[...]enough to know that is not accurate...There are laws and penalties lain out for failure to keep those laws...
Sure... There are penalties... But then, you have to understand where 'Let he who has not sinned cast the first stone' comes from... And understand the 'better Blood' for atonement... And the spirit of the law, not the letter... And redemption... and cities of refuge... Stop looking at single verses and see the whole thing. THEN apply Yeshua.
Naw...Laws may make criminals out of people who don't care to follow them...There are no criminals if there are no laws...
Better go read Paul again, because he says that exactly...
1Ti_1:9 Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
(e-Sword: KJV)
And if there are no laws, then there ARE no criminals, nor sin, nor wickedness, nor iniquity. Is THAT what you are promoting? Anarchy? THAT is the 'spirit of the Law'? OF COURSE NOT.
What the law is *for* is the knowledge of sin. That the whole world can come under judgement:
Rom_3:19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.
(Take THAT, those of you who think the Torah is only for the Jews)
I and the apostle Paul disagrees with you...Paul couldn't keep the law any more than the rest of us can...
Rom 7:15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.
And Paul was talking about sin and the law...
Sheesh Iscool, Read the chapter. I can't believe THAT is what you got out of it. Then again, he is speaking only to those who know the law (hmmm... imagine that... folks in pagan Rome knows the law... How'd that happen?)...
I get that the Torah is spiritual, wholesome and good, and that through Yeshua, Paul is inwardly yearning for it... But another law is in his flesh that prevents him from keeping Torah. As he says elsewhere:
Rom 8:2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.
Rom 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
Rom 8:4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
Rom 8:5 For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.
Rom 8:6 For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
Rom 8:7 Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
Rom 8:8 So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.
So Paul, no longer carnally minded, yearns for the Torah. Those that are carnally minded cannot yearn for the Torah. Is this getting through to you?
Very little information is written out on those links to Michael Rood's teachings. They are mostly You-tube videos where you have to watch and listen, or buy first, rather than be able to read it like a transcript would provide. Why is that? For example, he contends that people misinterpret Acts 10 to justify eating pork, but you have to get the DVD to hear his explanations on why eating pork is a sin. It's marketing and money making rather than sound Scriptural teaching out of Christian love.
What is depraved is the teaching that keeping the law is what saves us. Christ will write the law on our hearts - the new birth means a new spirit nature that walks in the light of truth and desires to live for God out of gratitude for His matchless grace. Following "Torah" never saved anyone - it has always been about grace. If we love him, Jesus said, we will obey His commandments. But obeying His commandments is not how we are redeemed and justified. We are saved by grace through faith and not by works.
??
What has that to do with the bare fact that all is not fulfilled? Until ALL is fulfilled in both the law and the prophets, the Mosaic covenant is still in effect.
Yet Yeshua specifically and explicitly instructed his disciples (that's us) to do and teach the Torah... Explicitly including the Mosaic covenant into the Messianic covenant... Your mission, if you choose to accept it, is to find out how BOTH can be true.
Not a doctrinal approach to understanding His Word. God provides our knowledge directly to us by our human spirit from God the Holy Spirit, not by man uncovering it.
This approach indicates he is selling his books more than preaching the Word of God.
Well you are talking right past me. I have never, ever claimed Torah is salvific. That is *not* what it is for. Torah is for the knowledge of sin.
[...] Following "Torah" never saved anyone - it has always been about grace.
I am saying *nothing* different than that...
If we love him, Jesus said, we will obey His commandments.
There ya go... NOW you are getting it! : )
But obeying His commandments is not how we are redeemed and justified. [...] We are saved by grace through faith and not by works.
YAY! Full on agreement!
There are also disputes against the triune nature of Almighty God - that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are ONE God. Do you accept the “Trinity”? That Jesus is God incarnate? Do you accept the teachings of Michael Rood on this or know what he teaches?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.