I absolutely love Lord Monckton's way of expressing himself. He really enjoys mocking the (arrogant) Prince.
But he has long been a Science Advisor to the Queen herself. I think the Prince would be well advised to shut his mouth and be quiet about this Scam called AGW.
Not a chance. As major stockholders in BP, the British Royals are among the most generous supporters of Green hustlers. Indeed, they had a lot to do with making it a global racket in controlling access to resources for fun and profit.
Interesting. Bookmarking.
I agree with Lord Monckton about Charles. I’ve always thought Charles was not worthy of inheriting the throne from the queen.
“Global warming” is now a knee slapping, belly laugh joke. What a political attempt to control free enterprise. Go to hell.,
“The Prince” is late in the game. Oregon’s then royal governor Kulingoski fired the state climatologist years ago for questioning AGW
The purpose of Science is to find the truth.
We used to use Cause and Effect, The Scientific Method and a large dose of skepticism.
Today we settle for what a politician can infer from Statistics, Null Hypothesis Testing, and voting.
A Scientist tries to prove his idea wrong, and failing to do so he/she is duty bound to ask his/her peers to prove his idea wrong.
After a large number of objective, independent testing of all assumptions, speculations and variables in the idea, it moves from an idea to a speculation to an hypothesis.
IF the peer Scientists cannot objectively prove the idea wrong, THEN a few frustrated peer Scientists will begrudgingly admit that the hypothesis should be tentatively raised to the rare and lofty level of a Theory.
Since the Global Warming Speculation has no known Cause and Effect, it thus remains where it began - - - as an unscientific speculation that is popular with Social Engineers.
Don’t think it would be a fair intellectual fight. Monckton would likely overwhelm Prince Charles who’s not known for intelligence.
I wonder if Charles even has the wits to comprehend what Lord Monckton just said to him.
The debate should be held immediately and it should be held outdoors.
Chazza couldn’t win a debate with a headless chicken.
bwaahaaHAA. gotta love it.
Monckton could in 3 minutes flat, take him on any subject Charles cared to spout off about. But 2 hours of AGW discussion sounds like the sort of good pummeling fun I would love to see.
Perhaps some other Global Warming "Climate Change" wind-bag will step into the breech.
Monckton has been demonstrating (marching) back-and-forth in front of their various castles (first the ivory-towers now increasingly tinged a sickening green) for years, and now, the castle-fort of the intellectually lightweight, pansy Prince Charles.
He's daring them all. But where are they? COWARDS, the lot of them.
But the Viscount would spring for the pub-tab, I would venture, regardless of outcome of the debate. Could we say that about those who don't dare face him? I will also venture that the answer to that would be a double "hell no".
well the English do enjoy beheading their kings with names starting with Charles..
Otherwise, see you down the pub.
_____________________________________
Charles will stand the Cherry Brandies...
:)
The Prince will bring Al Gore and Sarah Jessica Parker.
bkmk
State Dep't.: Not Building Keystone Pipeline Could Increase Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Landrieu eyed in anti-Keystone campaign
Fight Global Warming: Approve the Pipeline!
Global Warming on Free Republic