Posted on 09/12/2013 12:59:25 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz
I have been able to verify something extremely troubling in the past 12 hours. A close and verifiable source contacted me to lament the deployment of a friend from Ft. Hood to Egypt, where this particular soldier will be for the next nine months. We have no military base in Egypt, so were all trying to understand the assignment and wonder if he and the other 400 soldiers are living in a tent in the desert, and if they are, how do they receive supplies, from everything to food, water, ammunition, and fuel to conduct whatever mission they are to fulfill, for I cannot imagine a C-140 being allowed to land at Cairo International.
The following information has been sourced thoroughly. This particular soldier said that while he was not really thrilled about the assignment to Egypt, it was better than the soldiers that remained at the military base BECAUSE THEY HAD JUST RECEIVED THEIR DEPLOYMENT ORDERS TO GO TO SYRIA. That certainly contradicts the posturing and false reassurances and table-pounding of Obama and Kerry, does it not?
(Excerpt) Read more at mychal-massie.com ...
My take on it is that, yes, the Ft Hood units are going to the MFO in the Sinai, replacing the National Guard units this rotation that usually do it. I think the Syria deployment is BS *BUT* can't rule out anything with this idiot in office.
I thought that Bammy cancelled Bright Star this year because the Egypt military threw-out his buddy?
“MO FOs”
we wore orangish looking girl scout berets back in the mid 90’s.
it’s a UN-type deal so you have to look the part.
When the chickenincharge is a muzzie no telling what she, er, he will do..
Need to run this past my local person in charge of all things military to see if he has heard any buttlescutt..
Haven’t heard anything, but that doesn’t mean anything.
He did cancel Bright Star, as far as an official exercise goes. However, were I POTUS and had an opportunity to deploy forces smack dab in the middle of potential crisis, I think I would too. Likely the Pentagon would advise it.
If we think about the region for a bit, Syria is only part of it. The Egyptians have been killing increasing numbers of bad boys in the Sinai, and I would not be surprised if a lot of them hadn’t come up from the eastern Sahel, which has been a major al-Qaeda area of interest.
The US would also be near Libya, if needed, also North Sudan and Somalia. Pretty close to Saudi and the UAE.
And then, thinking back to Syria, they can also cover Lebanon and watch the Suez canal.
Yep, all else being equal, I don’t think having troops there is a particularly bad idea.
C-140’s, call sign Waxy. When flown as a flight check their call sign was Flight Check.
Mark. Msgt USAF, retired.
Why would there be any US forces in Egypt or Syria?
Because the mooselim chickenincharge wants to help his brotherhood?
Correct answer is that there should not be any there. If Assad blows up something over here, THEN we smack him...
Whenever Waxy came by for an operational evaluation and asked all those obscure ATC questions we would put a smart 3-level in position. It would be a great boost for their confidence, plus they were the only ones who knew the answer to the damn questions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.