Posted on 07/08/2013 3:14:54 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
PPSIMMONS News and Ministry can now reveal that Mike Zullo is in Washington D.C. today, Monday July 8, to meet with several high-ranking VIPS on Capitol Hill about the Sheriff Arpaio Obama Fraud case.
These latest meetings were asked for and arranged by the VIPS. Zullo will be answering all their questions and presenting the entire criminal case for their review.
We have also said that if in the final analysis, nothing is officially done by Congress - that we will eventually release EVERYTHING we have and know about this case. It will be released to the world in several big ways. Once the world sees what we know and then realize the very important people knew about it as well and then refused to act - it may blow the thing wide open - by the demand of We The People. We would much prefer that it be handled in an appropriate congressional manner - but if not, then we will do what we have to do. This is not going away - no matter how much the opposition wishes for it to go away.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
Your use of the elitist terms "sheeple" and "low information voters" reveal your feelings about the rest of us. You apparently feel that all important decisions (like selecting presidents) should be left to a relative handful of sophisticated, knowledgeable folks like you.
It's not at all clear to me that you're any better than any of the rest of us at picking presidents. So, at least for now, under our Constitution, you're stuck with the rest of us participating. And, at least for now, we (the voters and our electors) choose our presidents.
I hope you'll get used to that before it drives you crazy.
If he isn't a "natural born Citizen," he's a usurper holding the seat of Commander in Chief in direct violation of the Constitution.
Not sure impeachment would even apply.
LOL. Since when are the terms "sheeple" and "low information voters" elitist?
Furthermore, my direct quote was "sheeple (low information voters)" which means sheeple are low information voters IMV.
Do you consider yourself a low information voter? Is that why that phrase offends you?
We've had 57 presidential elections and not once has the Supreme Court ever even so much as hinted that it would ever attempt to seize the power to disqualify a presidential candidate. 57-0.
Under our Constitution, the voters and their electors have the power to rule on a candidate's qualifications. That judgement is final, even if you disagree and, believe it or not, even if you strongly disagree.
Under our Constitution, it's really that simple. That's why it's 57-0. After 2016, it will be 58-0, even if Ted Cruz wins.
Nor a spot on a coin/bill, nor a statue in DC.
If he can't be exposed 1 as the usurper he is while in office, then it must be done to prevent (the former) and to protect our future.
1. by those who can do something about it.
Res ipsa loquitur. Only an elitist would use such terms. They certainly aren't constitutional terms.
This is because this opinion is closely connected to the reality of the situation in which we find ourselves. Of course Obama, Cruz, and Rubio are "NOT natural born Citizens," as required by the Constitution as traditionally interpreted over the years. For example, when the Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes was asked to run for President, he declined because he was not a "natural born Citizen." It is also why Chet Arthur is now shown to have lied his ass off. He also knew he was not a "natural born Citizen."
However, Obama is now twice the sitting POTUS. Usurper, "natural born Citizen" or not, it is he flying overhead cuddling with Reggie Love in AF 1, not someone else. Thus it would appear that on the face of it, the courts, Congress, state election officials and 53% of the voters agree with Tau Food, and not with us.
That means this POV, no matter how abhorrent, must be taken very seriously. This POV also leaves us with the unenviable task of figuring out how to get the Constitution followed so that popular ineligible candidates cannot appear on the ballots of the states.
It also means that the entirely distinct matter of the forgeries proven by The CCP may very well be acted upon by Congress without ever mentioning the question of "natural born Citizenship." That of course is if Congress ever decides to look at the evidence.
Tau Foods represents a majority, slim though it may be. Problem is, it's a Republic-killer. If that majority holds up in the elections of 2014 1nd 2016, the anti-constitutionalists win and the Republic is dead.
What organization would send you to Pakistan while we were arming the Mujahedeen against the CCCP in Afhganistan, give you multiple passports from multiple countries, forge your Selective Service registration because as a government NOC you were ineligible for the draft, give you multiple forged birth certificates, seal your medical records so that vaccintaions required for assignments in certain regions of the world could not be identified, and then make your college transcripts national security secrets?
From those facts alone, most people might begin to wonder if those facts might contain clues indicating that the Supreme Court somehow doesn't conclude that Obama is just a usurper and clearly unqualified under the Constitution. Maybe they're just "low information justices" without the capacity to understand or properly interpret the Constitution? Maybe they need your help?
I'm going to suggest to you that maybe you shouldn't be so certain about your constitutional analysis of the NBC clause. Your interpretation of the clause is not required by the text of the Constitution. Your decision to get all tangled up in 18th century Swiss philosophy is totally voluntary on your part. If it makes you feel good, knock yourself out. But, don't be shocked that others disagree.
CRUZ 2016!
Oh, I'm not necessarily disputing any of that. What I'm wondering, "aloud," if you will, is why, if he's been "dipped" for work as a Company man, he would be reintroduced, or allowed to reintroduce himself to the public in a big-time way, when his "dipped" persona would almost certainly be subjected to intense scrutiny, with the inevitable questions his biographical dead ends would provoke?
And here I thought George H.W. Bush was the "Spook in Chief."
Did the public scrutiny accomplish anything??
Touché. No, it has not. Yet.
“””””..... even if you strongly disagree.”””””
In our Constitution words have meaning. Our founding fathers carefully composed these words so that we will know how we are to run our government. The Natural Born Citizen clause is one of the qualifications that must be met BEFORE a person can present him/herself to the people and ask for their vote for President of the USA. A presidential candidate must also be at least 35 years old.
If we follow your logic.... a person who is 25 years old can run for potus and if the people vote for that person, he/she can assume the office.... Right?
So the qualification of 35 means what????.... OBVIOUS
I too share your enthusiasm for Ted Cruz. he will make a great senator, perhaps governor or any other way the people or he wish for him to serve. However, unfortunately according to the words written in the constitution, he does not meet the qualifications for President.
The one way he can qualify, if there is an amendment passed allowing him to qualify. That is the law of the land.
“.....most of the members of the Supreme Court showed up to join in the inaugural celebration”
Using a broken corrupted system in order to justify your NBC position is not intellectually honest and plays into the hands of the evil doers. Unless of coarse you think that Justice Roberts change of mind on Obamacare at the last minute is without suspicion. Or that it is lawful for the NSA, CIA or IRS to spy on citizens..... Be WISE not BLIND
I share the hope you expressed, for their sakes and ours, and those who follow us, for the remainder of the time left in the story we were born into.
This is no game, it's just another test and lesson. The trick is to see what is real and what is illusion, to see the trick being played.
Once you do, you always get the right answer.
You can recognize the footprints to follow by all that comes with them.
Please.
How about just being honest with us about you and your agenda.
Why not tell us who you work for and your mission here.
Are you hanging material when we learn the truth or just a useful idiot or simply confused thanks to the progressive, teacher's union lead indoctrination program known as forced pubic education?
Wrong. There aren't enough voters who will support a 25 year old candidate. They know that the Constitution requires that a president be 35. The people of the United States aren't as stupid or as dishonest as you trying to suggest. The Constitution requires that voters and their electors not support a 25 year old candidate for president and for that reason they won't. So, quit worrying about that imaginary problem.
I believe Ted Cruz probably is qualified to be president. His mother was a U.S. citizen and he is a citizen without ever having been naturalized.
Now you know why things are the way they are. If you wish to distance yourself from reality by imagining that the members of our Supreme Court are just too dense to comprehend your unique genius when it comes to constitutional interpretation, you do so as a volunteer. Nobody is forcing you to suffer. The members of our Supreme Court have given you plenty of hints.
In modern think, that would make him a Canadian anchor baby, thus a Natural Born Canadian by your definition, not a natural born citizen. Or does that only work with illegal aliens?
Or, are you saying that America is a matriarchal society where only our mothers grant our citizenship? Which, therefore is automatically natural born because moms give birth by natural methods, so naturally mom makes you a natural born citizen?
Yeah, that's probably right.
I had read that we were more of a patriarchal society in a patriarchal world at that time, but you're clearly running at a much higher level than I am. No doubt that's what the FFs meant. Sure, yeah, no doubt about it.
Dude, end of times stuff going on all around you. This is not a good long term plan. Word from you Father.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.