Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sheriff Joe Lead Obama ID Fraud Investigator In High Level Meetings In Washington DC (Stockman?)
BirtherReport.com ^ | July 8, 2013 | Unattributed

Posted on 07/08/2013 3:14:54 PM PDT by Seizethecarp

PPSIMMONS News and Ministry can now reveal that Mike Zullo is in Washington D.C. today, Monday July 8, to meet with several high-ranking VIPS on Capitol Hill about the Sheriff Arpaio Obama Fraud case.

These latest meetings were asked for and arranged by the VIPS. Zullo will be answering all their questions and presenting the entire criminal case for their review.

We have also said that if in the final analysis, nothing is officially done by Congress - that we will eventually release EVERYTHING we have and know about this case. It will be released to the world in several big ways. Once the world sees what we know and then realize the very important people knew about it as well and then refused to act - it may blow the thing wide open - by the demand of We The People. We would much prefer that it be handled in an appropriate congressional manner - but if not, then we will do what we have to do. This is not going away - no matter how much the opposition wishes for it to go away.

(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: birthers; certifigate; joearpaio; mikezullo; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamafraud; obamaid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-200 next last
To: Flotsam_Jetsome; Southack

Company guy that later got turned by the “other side”, via blackmail, and the blackmail continues??!!??


101 posted on 07/09/2013 5:50:14 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome; Southack

Maybe 0 was “double -dipped”

:0


102 posted on 07/09/2013 5:54:44 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food

“”””The people of the United States aren’t as stupid or as dishonest as you trying to suggest. “”””

Oh is that what you got from my post? I am so sorry.... No, I do not think that the American people as a whole are dishonest or stupid.
I do think there is an organized effort underway by the left, mostly successful, to misinform especially when it comes to the foundational principles of our republic.

In our schools, we no longer celebrate the cornerstone of what makes us exceptional. We no longer stress that our rights come from our creator and unless we adhere to these principles the alternative is tyranny.

We live our lives with our hands out expecting government to take care of us while the left wing media and the left wing educational system keep us under-informed.

In order to be well informed, one must make an extraordinary focused effort. Most people trust government and are too busy with their lives trying to keep their heads above water.... I know this because when I try to inform my family and friends (very intelligent people) They think I am crazy.

Fortunately, very slowly, many are beginning to see the truth.


103 posted on 07/09/2013 5:56:16 PM PDT by Constitution 123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: GBA
You are saying that Cruz is a natural born citizen because he was born in Canada?

No, I'm saying that Cruz is a citizen now and that he didn't become a citizen by any naturalization process. Thus, he has been a citizen since birth. It is my tentative opinion that he thus qualifies as a NBC.

Obviously, there can be disagreements about candidate qualifications. Just as obviously, those disagreements have to be decided by some group of persons. I prefer that the voters and their electors decide those questions rather than a handful of elitists in black robes. I believe that the Constitution supports my view that presidents are to be selected by voters/electors and not by judges. I believe the Supreme Court agrees that they have no power to screen or disqualify candidates. It has never suggested otherwise.

So, I believe that if you think Cruz or some other candidate is not qualified to be president, you should make your pitch to the people who decide that issue - the voters/electors. I expect that there will be times when some folks disagree with the decision of the voters/electors, but that's the way our system works. I knew many people (including me) who thought that the jury made a mistake in acquitting OJ in his first criminal trial, but that's the way our system works and no judge or group of judges could set aside the jury's decision no matter how wrong and no matter how obviously wrong the jury's decision may have been.

Cruz was a star at Harvard law school. I suspect he has spent at least as much time as you studying the Constitution. He seems to believe he is a NBC.

If you or anyone else can convince me that Cruz is unqualified to be president, I will not support him. But, in my view, the books written in French are not nearly enough.

104 posted on 07/09/2013 6:04:20 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Constitution 123
Well, I agree with much of what you say about what many people nowadays seem to believe and that our country is heading in the wrong direction. However, I don't believe that things would be any better if we forced everyone to read Vattel's book, either in French or in English.

Mistakes can lead to corrections. Failures can lead to renewal. There is reason for hope. For example, I believe that when this current glut of grasping seniors pass on to their reward, a younger society will be more eager for smaller government and fewer welfare plans.

In the long run, I'm optimistic for our people.

105 posted on 07/09/2013 6:11:21 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food

“”””So, quit worrying about that imaginary problem””””

OMG.... It is not an imaginary problem.... It is an analogy!
Unlikely... True but used to makes my point which you refuse to acknowledge....Okay.... Im finished with you.... God Bless </:-)


106 posted on 07/09/2013 6:13:13 PM PDT by Constitution 123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Constitution 123

A problem with your analogy, if that’s all it was, is that the meaning of NBC is inherently more ambiguous than the meaning of 35 years of age. There’s not much room for differing opinions as to the meaning of the latter. There has been much disagreement with respect to the meaning of NBC.


107 posted on 07/09/2013 6:39:37 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57
"Maybe 0 was 'double -dipped'."

If so, let's hope their isn't a third, while he's still "in office." People are probably planning monuments to this monumental fraud already.

108 posted on 07/09/2013 6:48:24 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (No more usurpers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

Bath house Barry wants to head up the UN after his term is over.


109 posted on 07/09/2013 7:14:55 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food

“”””There has been much disagreement with respect to the meaning of NBC.””””

This ambiguity you speak of regarding the definition of Natural Born began only when Obama emerged. Prior to that, there was pretty much a uniform consensus. Born on USA soil of two citizen parents.

At one point, before Obama, there were unsuccessful efforts to change the definition but I do not know the details.


110 posted on 07/09/2013 7:25:29 PM PDT by Constitution 123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57; Flotsam_Jetsome; Southack
One needs to ask if we really know which side the Company is on....
111 posted on 07/09/2013 7:45:35 PM PDT by Hetuck ("We will Barry you" - Nikita Khrushchev)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Constitution 123
Prior to that, there was pretty much a uniform consensus. Born on USA soil of two citizen parents.

All I can say is that I was around for about 60 years before Obama got elected and I never heard anyone, ever, express the opinion that NBC required two citizen parents. Also, I never saw anyone, ever, reading Vattel in either the original French or in English. And, prior to 2009, I never heard anyone, ever, suggest that the Supreme Court is empowered to screen our presidential candidates or decide that any candidate is not qualified.

112 posted on 07/09/2013 7:48:12 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Butter, I’m intrigued: which law enforcement chief “nixed a routine document fraud arrest warrant when he found out it was for Obama?” Is this new information, or a different way of describing an event we already know?


113 posted on 07/09/2013 7:52:26 PM PDT by Hetuck ("We will Barry you" - Nikita Khrushchev)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food
>"you should make your pitch to the people who decide that issue - the voters/electors. "

Mob rule v rule of law.

Don't complain when the mob rules you! Now pay your 0c0mmieCair TAX!

114 posted on 07/09/2013 8:06:15 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Jeremiah 50:32 "The arrogant one will stumble and fall With no one to raise him up; And I will set)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Hetuck

It’s information new to me, referring to a time when an arrest could actually have been made. I can’t give any details and maybe shouldn’t even have mentioned it, but it stunned me to learn that one man choosing justice over politics could have spared this world so much.

One person can make a world of difference. We need to never forget that. The enemy hasn’t forgotten it. That’s why, in spite of all the attempts to demoralize us, they are still in deathly fear that some insider will find the courage to break the truth wide open. The person in question did not receive direct threats but knew he would be punished if he allowed the favored politician to be treated just like the rest of us would have been treated. It’s an unwritten rule that is killing this country - that politicians are above the law. But one person defying that rule could have turned the corrupt establishment upside-down and prevented this coup.


115 posted on 07/09/2013 8:13:22 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food
I agree that not too many people read Vattel. There was no need because back then the meaning of Natural born was pretty much understood

I learned the meaning of natural born in Jr High. Government class.

Also Before the 2008 Presidential campaign the dems tried to derail McCain' claiming he was not eligibile. The senate held hearings regarding this matter.... Here are 2 quotes ..... read and understand

“Because he was born to American citizens, there is no doubt in my mind that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen,” said Leahy. “I expect that this will be a unanimous resolution of the Senate.” (And so it was)

"My assumption and my understanding is that if you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen,” Chertoff replied. “That is mine, too,” said Leahy. OKAY? GOT IT?

116 posted on 07/09/2013 8:22:24 PM PDT by Constitution 123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

their there
117 posted on 07/09/2013 8:32:48 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (No more usurpers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Constitution 123
"At one point, before Obama, there were unsuccessful efforts to change the definition but I do not know the details."

Yes, there were eight attempts to change the definition.

118 posted on 07/09/2013 8:46:33 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (No more usurpers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Constitution 123
Well, point one would be that it isn't clear from what Leahy said that he would have a different opinion if only one of the parents was a citizen, as in Obama and Cruz. In fact, I'll bet that Leahy believes that one citizen parent is adequate.

Point two is that Leahy and Chertoff apparently did not agree with your contention that there was a consensus that the candidate had to have been born in the United States.

As for your civics class, I'll leave it to you to convince other voters and their electors that your junior high civics teacher distinguished between persons with one or two citizen parents when it comes to qualifying as a NBC. Not that I doubt it for a minute. ;-)

119 posted on 07/09/2013 8:51:43 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food
Tau Food..... You seem not to want to understand.

Do you really think that the framers would have accepted a Barrack Obama whose father is a a British subject under King George as eligible? (had he been alive then) as our first President? (please don't include the race issue) This was the whole reason behind the Natural Born Citizen requirement in the first place!! Your argument is so stupid and why are you so stubborn.....?

120 posted on 07/09/2013 9:04:17 PM PDT by Constitution 123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-200 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson