Replies

My guess is that CNN was referring to what it says on every Hawaii short form COLB: “This copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding.”

That doesn't address the point I brought up at all. Obama has had scores of opportunties to use any of his alleged COLBs or LFBCs in a court of law, yet he refuses. The question is how solid investigators don't act surprised or intrigued by this fact, but they can go track down somebody's mother who unsupported memories.

As for the skin color of babies at birth, I have no idea.

You don't to have an idea. We had an eyewitness describe baby Obama as new and PINK.

The baby in your first picture is probably at least 2 months old if not a couple of months older. This about the time when babies can lay on their tummy and lift their heads. As for the twins, it's irrelevant since we have a description of a new and PINK baby Obama.

What about the newborn in the second photo? Do they both look “pink” to you?
Obama’s attorneys have asked US District Court Judge Henry T. Wingate in Mississippi to take judicial notice of a Certified Letter of Verification from the Hawaii Registrar of Vital Statistics. Attached to that Letter of Verification is a copy of Obama’s long form birth certificate.
Since there is no state or federal law that requires a candidate or a federal elected official to submit a birth certificate, there has been no need for Obama to enter one into evidence in any lawsuit or ballot challenge. If a Trier of Fact would like to see the long form, he or she can issue a court order for its release. But I’m sure that you are aware that defendants are under no obligation to present ANY evidence. Perhaps a lawsuit will have a real discovery phase one of these days and the two copies Obama got from Hawaii will be on a discovery list.