Ruh-Roh! CIA Director Patraeus Tosses Prevaricator-in-Chief RIGHT Under the Bus on Benghazi Lies:

Reaganite Republican ^ | October 27, 2012 | Reaganite Republican

[Reaganite Republican]

'We weren't the ones who denied military support 

to Americans under attack in Benghazi'

Ah, what a tangled web we weave-  and guess you should have realized you'll never own this patriot, Barry:
________________________________________________________________________________

Weekly Standard via Weasel Zippers:

Breaking news on Benghazi: the CIA spokesman, presumably at the direction of CIA director David Petraeus, has put out this statement: 'No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate.' 

So who in the government did tell ;anybody' not to help those in need? 

Someone decided not to send in military assets to help those Agency operators. Would the secretary of defense make such a decision on his own? No.

It would have been a presidential decision. 

There was presumably a rationale for such a decision. What was it? When and why—and based on whose counsel obtained in what meetings or conversations—did President Obama decide against sending in military assets to help the Americans in need?

________________________________________________________________________________

Yet Obama still claims -entirely to the contrary-
that he 'gave an order' to secure our personnel-
another stinking lie:
________________________________________________________________________________

Gateway Pundit:

Obama told Denver’s WUSA TV this in regard to the Benghazi 9-11 terror attack, 'I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to. Number two, we’re going to investigate exactly what happened to make sure it doesn’t happen again. Number three, find out who did this so we can bring them to justice.'

Tonight however, Bing West, a former Assistant Secretary of Defense, told Greta Van Susteren, 'If that actually happened the way President Obama said it happened, there’s a paper trail and I think people reasonably enough can say, 'Can we see the order?' because hundreds of others supposedly saw this order.

Obama just got caught. He lied about his securing our personnel in Benghazi. And now the world will know about it...

________________________________________________________________________________

Hillary of course has already lawyered-up, and her guy is saying in no uncertain terms that Obama's the one that ignored repeated pleas for added security in Benghazi over the previous months.

In Denver Dear Leader also purported that 'This election has
nothing to do with Benghazi'- so I guess if we all can just agree on that, this whole unpleasant thing can go away until after the election.

HAH HAH HAH ha ha ha ha ha hyuk-hyuk guffaw snort-chuckle.

________________________________________________________________________________

DougRoss@Journal   Gateway Pundit   Weasel Zippers   FB

[RFEngineer]

“That means that two are still alive. “

You’re right, there were 4. The two that lived did the right thing, and should be groomed for command somewhere, but will, no doubt, be ostracized for their implementing the greatest strength of the individual U.S. soldier - initiative.

[TomGuy]

Woods' and Doherty's boss:

The American special operators, Woods, Doherty and at least two others were part of the Global Response Staff, a CIA element, based at the CIA annex and were protecting CIA operators

Link to thread & post

[M-cubed]

Then why not just say it in plain english? He could tell us PRECISELY who decided what, why, and their exact words. <<

IMHO...Not the way it works!....(and if you think about it you wouldn't want it to).....He shouldn't be telling “us” anything that may be a security violation........It is, however, the job of congress to put him under oath in a classified setting so that the truth can be told without compromising classified intel/info....Having said that....I'm not sure Id trust congress to do the investigation right!......The CIA statement alone begs for an investigation....I believe that's why Petraeus authorized it