Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Science Guy’ Bill Nye Blasts Evolution ‘Deniers’
The Christian Diarist ^ | August 28, 2012 | JP

Posted on 08/28/2012 11:53:12 AM PDT by CHRISTIAN DIARIST

Bill Nye used to be “The Science Guy” on PBS. Now he’s just a godless hater.

The former host of the “educational” TV show targeted to preteens, which aired from 1993 to 1998, said this week that those of us who believe that God created man and woman are idiots. And that we ought not pass along that belief to our children.

“I say to the grownups,” Nye condescended, “if you want to deny evolution and live in your world, your world that’s inconsistent with everything we observe in the universe, that’s fine. But don’t make your kids do it.”

Because, said Nye, who places his faith in Darwin, rather than God, “We need scientifically literate voters and taxpayers for the future.”

As I considered Nye’s remarks, I wondered if he passed along his thoughts on evolution to Rick Warren, pastor of Saddleback Church in Orange County, California, who presided over The Science Guy’s quicky marriage back in 2006 (which lasted a mere seven weeks before ending in a decidedly weird, decidedly ugly breakup).

What does it say about Nye’s integrity that he stood before a pastor who absolutely believes the creation story set forth in the Book of Genesis; that he exchanged marriage vows with his seven-week bride before a God in Whom he doesn’t believe?

Yet, he presumes to tell the rest of us what we should teach our children.

And while Nye may be scientifically “literate,” notwithstanding that he has no formal scientific education, he is not nearly as infallible as he makes himself out to be.

Just last year, in fact, The Science Guy demonstrated his scientific shortcomings when he appeared on CNN to discuss damage sustained by a Japanese nuclear plant in the wake of a devastating earthquake and tsunami.

Nye stated, incorrectly, that cesium is used to “slow and control” the nuclear reaction. But as any nuclear scientist would tell him, cesium is a nuclear fission product, not a control rod material.

Nye also stated, incorrectly, that the nuclear reactor involved in the Three Mile Island accident was still online.

And The Science Guy erred in telling CNN viewers that use of boron to slow the nuclear reaction is uncommon, when, in fact, boron-10 is commonly used in control rods and is circulated in the coolant of most, if not all, reactors in this country.

Now, the average CNN viewer could not be expected to know these things. But Nye, the so-called Science Guy, should have known better. Especially if he was going to discuss the subject on national TV.

It obviously doesn’t occur to Nye that, if he was dead wrong on nuclear energy, he could be just as wrong on evolution.

Otherwise the former Science Guy wouldn’t be so contemptuous of those of who are not scientific illiterates; who simply find less believable the science-fiction that ape transmogrified into man, than the Bible’s explanation that all-powerful God created man.


TOPICS: Education; Religion; Science; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: atheism; billnye; evolution; intelligentdesign
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

I used to watch this idiot in Seattle’s ALMOST LIVE back in the 90’s when I was a kid, and that Seattle show came before SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE. He was a hoot.

Now he’s an idiot. Everyone of his science experiments were elementary-school grade stuff, but when it came to high school physics, my old classmate who is on the JPL staff told me years ago they used to laugh at Nye because he was teaching them the wrong fundamentals of science on his show.


21 posted on 08/28/2012 12:26:21 PM PDT by max americana (Make the world a better place by punching a liberal in the face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

Love the Science Guy ... still, it's not cool to present evolution as a singular concept where microevolution and macroevolution exist, and then claim the children must be brainwashed into accepting the whole enchilada as fact for the national "good". (If that were the way science and politics worked, we'd all be flat-earthers watching the Sun rotate around us.) Macroevolution remains a hypothesis unsuccessfully tested.


22 posted on 08/28/2012 12:29:33 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander
Thanks, I agree with that.

"Concerning biological evolution, the Church does not have an official position on whether various life forms developed over the course of time. However, it says that, if they did develop, then they did so under the impetus and guidance of God, and their ultimate creation must be ascribed to him.

Concerning human evolution, the Church has a more definite teaching. It allows for the possibility that man’s body developed from previous biological forms, under God’s guidance, but it insists on the special creation of his soul. Pope Pius XII declared that "the teaching authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions . . . take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter—[but] the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God" (Pius XII, Humani Generis 36). So whether the human body was specially created or developed, we are required to hold as a matter of Catholic faith that the human soul is specially created; it did not evolve, and it is not inherited from our parents, as our bodies are.

While the Church permits belief in either special creation or developmental creation on certain questions, it in no circumstances permits belief in atheistic evolution."


http://www.catholic.com/tracts/adam-eve-and-evolution
23 posted on 08/28/2012 12:29:33 PM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: max americana

He couldn’t hold a candle to Julius Sumner Miller...this guy was the real deal. I even got my kids hooked on watching his old videos.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JV8oK_x1_aI


24 posted on 08/28/2012 12:30:07 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Shannon’s theory of information trumps Darwin on evolution.

DNA aka living code does not write itself nor can it re-write itself for new and improved functions and life forms.

Center for Scientific Creation - In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/IntheBeginningTOC.html


25 posted on 08/28/2012 12:36:15 PM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Mr. Nye chose to make an argument from authority. In so doing, he made his lack of authority a central issue.


26 posted on 08/28/2012 12:39:50 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

I am unsure of what uncomfortable truth you are speaking.


27 posted on 08/28/2012 12:48:03 PM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (Science puts you on the moon, atheism puts you in the gulag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
Nye stated, incorrectly, that cesium is used to “slow and control” the nuclear reaction. But as any nuclear scientist would tell him, cesium is a nuclear fission product, not a control rod material.

Wait just a second! Given enough time, it's entirely possible that the probablistic forces of materialistic evolution could produce control rods made of cesium that would work. After all, given enough time, anything can happen!

28 posted on 08/28/2012 12:51:01 PM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (Science puts you on the moon, atheism puts you in the gulag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative sympathizer

Evolution came from Greek philosophers such as Anaximater of Miletus; he first proposed that all life started in the hydrosphere and gradually moved to live in the atmosphere. Daoism also has the notion of “constant transformation” of living beings. Merely acknowledging the spiritual realm does not mean believing in the truth about it.


29 posted on 08/28/2012 12:52:38 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: trailhkr1

Deny what?


30 posted on 08/28/2012 12:53:59 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Slayton
Nye has spent years corrupting our youth and turning them away from their Christian faith and filling their heads with science mumbo jumbo.

Science mumbo jumbo is why Americans live in comfort and prosperity (Obama's efforts to the contrary notwithstanding). If you want your children to be free from science mumbo jumbo, you might consider enrolling them in school in Afghanistan or large parts of sub-Saharan Africa.

31 posted on 08/28/2012 12:54:33 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels
DNA aka living code does not write itself nor can it re-write itself for new and improved functions and life forms.

Like lactose tolerance?

32 posted on 08/28/2012 12:55:04 PM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Slayton

ah but he really is saying without him knowing that we do need a male and a female to reproduce not two homosexuals.

So if he is stating for nature and Darwin then he is still saying one man and one woman is need to reproduce in order for the human species to survive.

The left really are dumb, no matter how they go about their agenda they still get back to a male and a female not two males for reproduction.


33 posted on 08/28/2012 12:56:04 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Slayton
Nye has spent years corrupting our youth and turning them away from their Christian faith and filling their heads with science mumbo jumbo.

While it may be mumbo jumbo, evolution isn't really "science."

34 posted on 08/28/2012 12:57:09 PM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (Science puts you on the moon, atheism puts you in the gulag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

but it takes a male an a female to reproduce for the human species to carry on.

Guess he’s saying homosexuals are doing what nature did not intend for them to do.


35 posted on 08/28/2012 12:57:26 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

Since Nye is using observation as his argumentative basis, he must not have a brain since we can’t observe it.


36 posted on 08/28/2012 12:58:37 PM PDT by hsrazorback1 (Seek truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels
Shannon’s theory of information trumps Darwin on evolution.

Nice try, but bogus. Information theory is not applicable to evolutionary models because there is no pre-stated alphabet of biological features.

37 posted on 08/28/2012 1:00:04 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

Just saw on Drudge that archealogists are now studying 230 million year old mites encased in amber. Other than the fact that these mites ate confiers (which most modern mites do not) the old and current are basically the same. There are multiple species of insects and animals (crocodiles for one) that are largely unchanged for millions of years. Are we to believe that evolution is selective as to which species are evolved, or that some species reached the height of a suposedly ever changing system? The “evolution” of dominant genes can explain why there are less redheads in the world today but as for turning monkeys into men, the theory has just too many holes to be put forth as certainty.


38 posted on 08/28/2012 1:00:48 PM PDT by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

The uncomfortable truth is the massive amount of evidence that contradicts the bible version of creation. There is massive amounts of evidence for the process of evolution acting over many billions of years. Science can describe the mechanism of evolution to a certain extent but it can not explain why there is life. What the evidence does, categorically, is contradict the young earth creation story of the bible. The theory of evolution does not preclude the possibility of intelligent design but it does preclude the biblical account, taken literally. To dismiss that evidence is willful blindness to facts of reality.


39 posted on 08/28/2012 1:04:52 PM PDT by albionin (A gawn fit's aye gettin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

Hey Bill Nye - Crocodile and Sharks buddy, Crocodiles and Sharks.


40 posted on 08/28/2012 1:07:12 PM PDT by Catholic Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson