Yes, he would shred it by increasing the size of government. Every year.
Old man Hite is speaking for himself as head of a union and NOT for the plumbers, pipe fitters and sprinkler fitters - I know TOO many of them and know they don't think like Hite.
Actually it was clinton who took pride in his shredding the social fabric of our nation.
Impossible. Libs already did that. One could argue there’s hardly anything left to shred.
Correction. ‘Ryan would shred Socialism of this nation.’
The only social fabric this asshat knows of is the net used to trap freedom and entrepreneurship. Shred that and I’ll be eternally grateful.
Oh, dear - a Marxist/Collectivist dislikes and disapproves of Ryan; Romney must have picked a good one.
Then I would put forth the case that the Unions,
raped, sodomized, pissed on, then went for a "union authorized" brake
to this nation and every "real working person"(some of which are the rank & file of the Unions minus the officials).
F'en thug, punka$$ union carbon unit.
V/R...
Just sayin
These union people just don’t get it. If they re-elect that 0bama, there will be NO work. What part of that do they do not get?
The tide is turning, the days of big labor are waning. We’ve seen it in New Jersey, wisconsin and in other states who realize that concessions are what is turning deficits into surpluses. Union leaders understand this, their gravytrain days are over and they are desparate t maintain that. This is their last gasp.
Yes, because the tearing apart of the social fabric as a result of the unbridled growth of government, the welfare state and runaway unemployment are so much more preferable.
If the criticism comes from a union leader, we’re doing the right thing.
Upon reading the headline I thought it was the Manchester Union Leader dissing the Ryan pick.
Lowlife leaders of trade unions have about as much influence, excepting their gargantuan contributions to socialist candidates, as a pimple on a private’s ass.
Union Leader Says Ryan Would ‘Shred The Social Fabric Of Our Nation’
As opposed to Obama forcing homosexuals on the military, homosexual marriage on society, forcing Christians to pay for abortions and saddling our children and grand children with 16 TRILLION dollars of debt?????
And by social fabric he means unionized bulling.
I would love to add some salt to the eye solution for the left on this, here is what Ryan should do...
Get together with Sarah Palin, get right alongside her at the next Tea Party event, get her close to him for cause and effect, with her as an “aide” the left will become totally unglued.
It NEVER fails to amaze me how these people would have a lot more pipes to fit if they’d get off of the Democrat plantation. If they’re doing the same type of plumbing work that I’ve done in the past, that tells me that they are highly skilled and they don’t need to the amalgamated brotherhood (or whatever the hell they call themselves) to find them work - their work speaks for itself.
They just seem oblivious to the Dem (and Rick Perry, to be fair) policy of coddling Illegals - how does that help them. Or the Dems trying to shut down the country - there are not many pipes to fit at a closed factory.
It’s already been shredded.
Unions fail to realize that there are States that don’t have unions and they are doing much better.
Paul Ryan IS the social fabric of this nation
Even though Mr Hopie Change has pledged to unravel it
The intent is to shred the "socialist" fabric of the nation.
Far better than what will happen to them during an actual collapse.
Ryan's budget proposal will not be enacted, although it ought to be. That isn't how the Vice Presidency works anyway, or we'd have been under the Cheney plan or (shudders) the Algore budget. Wrap your head around that one without cringing.
Now that it isn't me - and I can assure my fellow FReepers that my beanie was in the circle until the very last - I can reveal the Drill Plan. Now the downside to a lot of these schemes to cut the size of government is that it will put a lot of bureaucrats out on the street - I'm saying that like it's a bad thing - and that we'll have the darlings living out of the backs of their limos while they search for some hideously unfortunate community function to administer. I don't think the rag-pickers are unionized yet but I'm a little out of touch.
But here's the deal - actual personnel costs don't appear to be all that high in the scheme of things, not even when you throw in a retirement cushier than any of the rest of us could ever contemplate. It's the rest of the stuff they do that costs money. So here's the deal - we pay them to go to work and sit at their desks and leave us the hell alone. Yes, I realize that makes government the functional equivalent of a protection racket. And that differs from now...how?